Search Weight Loss Topics:

Page 338«..1020..337338339340..350360..»

Category Archives: Diet And Food

Vegan Keto Diet: List of plant-based foods you can eat on the weight loss plan – Times Now

Posted: June 15, 2020 at 11:45 am

Vegan Keto Diet: List of plant-based foods you can eat on the weight loss plan  |  Photo Credit: iStock Images

New Delhi: The Keto diet or the Ketogenic diet is one of the most popular diet plans followed by people for quick weight loss. The diet comprises of low calorie, high-fat food, that help to put the body on the process of ketosis. This helps to burn fat, instead of carbohydrates, for the energy required by the body to perform every day activities, and hence helps in weight loss.

At the same time, a vegan diet has also been linked to many health benefits ranging from weight loss to a healthier heart. So can people who want to stay vegan follow a keto diet? Well, yes, they can. However, most foods that are high in healthy fats are non-vegetarian or animal-based. Here is a list of plant-based foods that people who wish to follow a vegan keto diet can include on their plate to get the best of both worlds.

Disclaimer: Tips and suggestions mentioned in the article are for general information purpose only and should not be construed as professional medical advice. Always consult your doctor or a dietician before starting any fitness programme or making any changes to your diet.

For full coverage on Coronavirus pandemic, click here.Join the Times Group initiative #MaskIndia.Share a picture with your home-made mask on your social handles using #MaskIndia. The best picture will be featured in TOI and on maskindia.com

Read this article:
Vegan Keto Diet: List of plant-based foods you can eat on the weight loss plan - Times Now

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on Vegan Keto Diet: List of plant-based foods you can eat on the weight loss plan – Times Now

Roach: Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes – LubbockOnline.com

Posted: June 15, 2020 at 11:45 am

DEAR DR. ROACH: My husband is a 50-year-old prediabetic who has recently experienced burning feet. He refuses to think it's his high-carb diet (bread three times a day, chips, ice cream) and instead thinks he just needs some vitamins for foot pain. Could you please explain why and how what he eats affects everything he's experiencing? -- Anon.

ANSWER: Diabetic neuropathy is a condition found in people who have had diabetes for years. It causes different symptoms in different people, but pain (often burning in character) and numbness are most common. The underlying cause is uncertain, but seems to be a combination of factors leading to nerve damage.

Prediabetes, often along with the other components of metabolic syndrome -- including high blood pressure, excess abdominal fat and high cholesterol or triglycerides -- may also bring on a neuropathy with very similar symptoms. Other causes, especially vitamin B12 deficiency, are appropriate to evaluate before determining the condition is most likely due to diabetes or prediabetes.

There are no specific treatments for the neuropathy, although there are medications to ease symptoms. Treatment of the underlying metabolic syndrome is therefore of the utmost importance, and the two most important treatments are diet and exercise. Avoiding simple carbohydrates, such as found in bread and chips, or the sugars in ice cream, is paramount. Regular exercise has an independent effect that adds to the effectiveness of the dietary changes.

Your husband is at risk, and the fact that the symptoms are recent means he should look at this as a wake-up call. Changing his lifestyle dramatically now can lead not only to improvement in symptoms (or at least they won't get worse), but it will also reduce his risk of heart attack and stroke.

There are many places to get help: His doctor, a registered dietitian nutritionist and a diabetes nurse educator all are excellent potential sources of information, but he has to make the decision to start the lifestyle change. Vitamins do not help diabetic neuropathy. If he can start making the changes, I hope he will find, as most people have, that his quality of life and sense of well-being are so much better that he will not want to stop his healthier lifestyle. Medications may be helpful, but the primary treatment is diet and exercise.

DEAR DR. ROACH: My wife smoked for many years and finally quit with the help of nicotine gum that is 4 milligrams each. Since quitting almost 20 years ago, she continues to use about 12 pieces of nicotine gum per day. Does ingesting this much nicotine in this manner put her at risk for developing some type of cancer from the nicotine? -- T.D.

ANSWER: No, nicotine is not carcinogenic, that is to say cancer-causing. In large doses, it is dangerous, but the doses she is taking are not -- at least, for a person used to them. Early signs of nicotine toxicity are excess salivation, nausea and vomiting.

There are many toxic substances in tobacco, some of which are cancer-causing. The tobacco does not need to be burned; chewing tobacco and snuff increase the risk of oral cancer. About half of all people who smoke will die because of smoking-related illness. Even one cigarette a day has significant long-term health risks.

Although it's not ideal that she continues to use nicotine gum (and it's not cheap), there is no doubt that the gum is much, much safer for her than continuing to smoke.

Readers may email questions to ToYourGoodHealth@med.cornell.edu. (c) 2020 North America Syndicate Inc.

Link:
Roach: Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes - LubbockOnline.com

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on Roach: Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes – LubbockOnline.com

How Red Meat Became the Red Pill for the Alt-Right – The Nation

Posted: June 15, 2020 at 11:45 am

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Nearly a billion pounds of beef move through the JBS processing plant in Grand Island, Neb., every year. Except this year: Over the last two months, the company has had to slow production as meatpacking plants around the country have been roiled by coronavirus outbreaks.1Ad Policy

In late March, Nebraska state health officials, fearing such outbreaks, urged Governor Pete Ricketts to temporarily close the plant.2

After Ricketts rebuffed them, stories of missing hand sanitizer and soap, no personal protective gear, and insufficient safety precautions began to leak out of the plant, which as of April had 260 confirmed Covid-19 cases that can be tied back to it. Its difficult to know how many more among its 3,000 workers have been infected since then, because Ricketts has refused to disclose official plant numbers. Across the country, rural areas that contain meatpacking plants with outbreaks of Covid-19 have rates five times those of other rural areas.3

In a daily briefing on April 23, Ricketts dismissed those who thought the largely immigrant meatpacking workers in his state deserved relief by warning, Think about how mad people were when they couldnt get paper products.4

President Donald Trump issued an executive order five days later recognizing meat as a scarce and critical material essential to the national defense, adding that he would ensure a continued supply of protein for Americans under the Defense Production Act of 1950. Rickettsundeterred by the outbreaks in his state and emboldened by the White Houseissued a press release declaring May as Beef Month in Nebraska.5Related Article

Politically, this shows that meat is indispensable, said University of Notre Dame professor Joshua Specht, whose 2019 book Red Meat Republic recounts the history of American beef production. Shortages of meat will personalize the pandemic for everyone, and that is a major political problem when youre trying to say the country is open for business.6

The Covid-19 pandemic has laid bare the fragility of American supply chains, and nothing demonstrates that more acutely than the price spikes, depleted meat aisles, and imposed rationing on a food that weve come to expect in limitless quantities. The brutality of effectively sacrificing human beings to keep those aisles well stocked might be the breaking point in what was already the liveliest debate inside food: the future of beef in the American diet.7Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Industrial beef is the most polluting, the most carbon-emitting, and the most resource-intensive form of protein. A 2018 study published in the journal Nature recommended that the average US citizen cut beef consumption by 75 percent if we want to keep the global temperature rise to less than 2degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. In the context of Covid-19, University of Minnesota biologist Rob Wallace has made the connection between global industrial livestock farming and the proliferation of superviruses.8

If youre reading this, youve probably already heard that you should be cutting down on beef. But Trumps and Rickettss decisions show that with beef so embedded in American culture, its not going anywhere without a fight.9

JBS: This Nebraska meatpacking plant processes nearly a billion pounds of beef a yearand is a Covid-19 hot spot for its workers.

Rickettss warning of riots if big government comes for our beef echoes the claim by former Trump adviser Sebastian Gorka that the Green New Deal is a harbinger of authoritarian communism. They want to take away your hamburgers, he bellowed in a speech at the 2019 Conservative Political Action Conference. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved. Gorka made it explicit: To threaten the primacy of meat in the American diet is to threaten a pillar of what it means to be a free American.10

Sebastian Gorka: The former Trump adviser warned, They want to take away your hamburgers. (CC 3.0)

Gorkas ravings about government-mandated burger confiscation sound like some nefarious plot by the same postmodern cultural Marxists decried by the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. In 2018 he revealed on the wildly popular Joe Rogan Experience podcast that he was following an extreme form of the now trendy high-fat, high-protein paleolithic and ketogenic diets: just beef and water. Thanks to the carnivore diet, as he called it, Peterson said hed lost 50 pounds, cured his 30-year gum disease, and seen his lifelong depression cease. Meat, manIm telling you, meat, reads an endorsement of the diet beneath an Instagram photo of him solemnly cutting through a steak.11

Jordan Peterson: Claims he lost 50 pounds, and cured depression and gum disease thanks to a carnivore diet. (CC-BY-SA-2.0)

Peterson first emerged in the public consciousness after protesting a Canadian policy about observing gendered pronouns, which he claimed as evidence of creeping authoritarian rule. He subsequently rode that wave of free-speech martyrdom to a best-selling book, 12 Rules for Life, full of banal self-help infused with social Darwinism. Peterson addresses feelings of real alienation in his audience, but instead of locating the structural sources of their misery, he harks back to an imaginary past when men could be men, before Western civilization became preoccupied with social justice and feminism. In recent years hes become a kind of soothsayer for the mostly young white male demographic that is the subject of worried fascination in the current age of homegrown extremism.12

Its been 30 years since Carol J. Adamss landmark The Sexual Politics of Meat connected the subjugation of animals with the subjugation of women. Studies have shown that men are less likely to embrace eco-friendly practices because we perceive them as feminine; a recent survey of men in the United States found that they were less likely to wear a protective face mask during the pandemic because they viewed them as a sign of weakness.13

If you like this article, please give today to help fund The Nations work.

Petersons promotion of the carnivore diet was met with scornful incredulity and ridiculed as a self-defeating attempt to own the libs. But defenders of the diet pushed back, reminding us that humans are meant to eat meat and that it provides essential nourishment in the wasteland of the standard American dietdefined by high-fructose corn syrup, refined grains, and industrial seed oils.14

We shouldnt project our politics onto people who are half-dead, trying to get their lives back. Thats what his daughter, Mikhaila Peterson, 28, told me when I asked her about the politics of promoting an all-beef diet in the 21st century. She put her dad on the diet after it helped her with a crippling autoimmune disease and has since rebranded it as her very own Lion Diet.15

You have to reach a certain level of desperation to try it, she admitted. But because of how the media has been portraying Dad, the diet has been unfairly associated with the alt-right. Assigning people a conscious political identity based on their diet would be unwise; Adolf Hitler, famously, was a vegetarian.16

Adrienne Rose Bitar: Diet books replicate the 19th century religious form of the Jeremiad. (Cornell University History Dept )

But it would be equally unwise to ignore the embrace of red meat by the far right. Diet books were among the best-selling literature of the 20th century. More than simply offering guidance on which foods to eat and which to avoid, they remain a way to construct grand narratives about who we are. Self-help gets trashed as being an opiate of the masses, said Adrienne Rose Bitar, the author of Diet and the Disease of Civilization. But very few dieters see themselves on an individual quest for bodily perfection. Rather they recognize societal problems like obesity or diabetes and think that theyre going to do their own small part, however impossibly, to create a better world.17

Rogan and alt-right icons like Mike Cernovich and Alex Jones are already established in the dude self-care space, selling skin serums and supplements that might otherwise be considered ladylike. In recent years soy boy has eclipsed cuck as a term to deride the tofu-loving, beta-male archetype. The same return to a past, forgotten glory of men that is central to the appeal of people like Peterson and the nostalgic project of making America great again can also be found among advocates of low-carb regimes like the paleo, keto, and carnivore diets, which stress a return to the natural and traditional foodways of a healthier past.18

Conservative radio host Dennis Pragers faux university PragerU released a video last year titled How the Government Made You Fat, in which the low-carb cardiologist Bret Scher critiques the US Department of Agricultures food pyramid. The antiBig Government message is clear: You are responsible for your own health. Dont rely on the government to take care of you. For the One America News Network correspondent and former Pizzagate enthusiast Jack Posobiec and the far-right commentator Stefan Molyneux, praising meat-heavy, low-carb nutrition is a way to draw a contrast with the crypto-vegetarian piles of birdseed at the public schools their children attend, and Molyneux speculated it could be a communist plot. For others, eating meat is a way to police the boundaries of masculinity. In 2017 the far-right Canadian commentator Faith Goldy asked whether our fridges were the reason men were all of a sudden signing up for womens studies classes. Alex Joness former sidekick Paul Joseph Watson wondered if soy was making Western men more likely to adopt left-wing beliefs. Anthony Johnson regularly hosts paleo nutritionists as part of his premier manosphere gathering, the 21 Convention.19

Even the onetime steak salesman Trump did some nutritional virtue-signaling when it was revealed that he regularly enjoyed two Big Macs at dinner. His former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski quickly clarified to CNN that Trump never ate the bread, which is the important part. The National Cattlemens Beef Associationwhich lobbied for meatpacking plants to remain open during the pandemicdispatched its former senior director of sustainable beef production research, Sara Place, to assure the conservative media host Glenn Beck that methane emissions from cow farts were fake news and that cattle are part of the climate change solution.20

Faith Goldy: The fault is not in ourselves, but in our fridges. (CC 3.0)

Contemporary right-wing politics survives on a diet of grievance, persecution, and misdirection. In the right-wing mind, feminists and social justice warriors have been joined by the CEOs of Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, creator of the Beyond Burger (the demand for alternative meat has skyrocketed but has not surpassed the demand for beef during the pandemic), Bill Gates, animal rights activists, Greta Thunberg, and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to carry water for the vegan agenda. Modern society has created the least masculine men in history, reads one tweet by the Internets mysterious self-described meat philosopher Carnivore Aurelius. Another proclaims, The Carnivore Diet is the red pill that wakes you up to reality. In these circles, the war on meat is a war on men. Red meat is the red pill.21

Even before the current once-in-a-century public health crisis, it was an anxious time to try to eat healthy. Chronic afflictions like obesity, cancer, heart disease, and diabetescommonly referred to as diseases of civilizationpersist at rates bordering epidemic levels. As populations around the world modernize and adopt something closer to the standard American diet, health outcomes worsen. Our understanding of nutrition hasnt helped.22

The Australian historian Gyorgy Scrinis coined the term nutritionism for a paradigm that allows food corporations to rebrand and remarket ultraprocessed food as health food. In 2007 he identified a nutritional loss of legitimacy that had opened the door to the construction of new nutritional worldviews.23

The paleo diet (the defining diet of the era, according to Bitar) is one example. Drawing on evolutionary biology and the caveman mystique, paleo mimics what was supposedly available to preagricultural humans, with a meat-heavy, grain-free, minimally processed diet. Its what we ate before everyones health went to shit, to quote John Durant, the author of The Paleo Manifesto. The framing is instructive. All diet plans are an attempt to mediate the transition from an agricultural, pastoral lifestyle to an urban, industrialized oneand the distance thats put between us and our food. Existential anxiety over what that change has done to our food and thus ourselves is what unites all diet literature.24

Diet books replicate the 19th century religious form of the jeremiad, Bitar said. They say we are fat, we are ugly, we are sinnersbut together we can lose the weight and regain our understanding of what nature and God can bring. In an essay for the food studies journal Gastronomica, historian Michael Kideckel noted that this understanding of food invariably launders a reactionary view of history.25

Get unlimited access: $9.50 for six months.

In this philosophy of the past, Americans must rediscover a primitive instinct from a time when women did more work within the home, immigrants and indigenous people were even more marginalized, and fewer people saw culture and tradition as the product of specific human decisions, Kideckel wrote. For Durant, our collective health went to shit when women left the kitchen, outsourcing the cooking to corporations. Their traditional role was always an important one and shouldnt be trivialized, he said in a 2017 interview.26

Dieting has been considered a feminine pursuit for so long that when Weight Watchers first marketed to men in 2007, said Tulsa University professor Emily Contois, the tagline was Real men dont diet. But the first diet plans emerged during the mid- to late 19th century, when the ideal man came to be embodied in muscular selves, nations, empires and races, wrote the essayist Pankaj Mishra, who drew parallels between the 19th centurys ideas of manliness and those that contaminate politics and culture across the world in the 21st century.27

Lord Salisbury: Inventor of the eponymous steak. Civilization is harmful to your health. (History Dept. Cornell University)

The earliest diet to go by that name was a meat-heavy, proto-low-carb plan credited to a wealthy Londoner named William Banting, who in 1863 published the pamphlet Letter on Corpulence. It was such a best seller that Bant became a synonym for diet. Dr. James Salisbury, the inventor of the steaks, was another diet pioneer. He experimented with periods of eating only a single food like bread, oatmeal, baked beans, or asparagus before landing onwhat else?beef. It was the food that is most easily digested and that we can subsist on exclusively the longest, wrote Elma Stuart, a follower of Salisburys, in her book What Must I Do to Get Well?28

Diet theorist Mose Velsor: better known as Walt Whitman, inveighed against confections, sweets, salads, things fried in grease.

Salisbury saw his book The Relation of Alimentation and Disease as a way to address the character and capabilities of Western men. Civilization, he wrote, was damaging their physical and moral health, making them more likely to sin and shirk responsibility. He may have been influenced by Mose Velsor, a columnist for the New York Atlas, who in the 1850s worried that city life was producing a generation of soy boys. When Velsors columns were rediscovered and republished in 2016 as Guide to Manly Health and Training, they bore the authors real name: Walt Whitman. Healthy manly virility, he wrote, was being depleted. To foster a more pure-blooded race, Whitman recommended an end to confections, sweets, salads, things fried in grease. Instead he advocated eating fresh meat with as few outside condiments as possible.29

The connection between eating meat and the superiority of Western men was drawn out further in an 1869 essay The Diet of Brain Workers by the neurologist George Miller Beard. What have the natives of South America, the savages of Africa, the stupid Greenlander, the peasantry of Europe, all combined, done for civilization, in comparison with any single beef-eating class of Europe? he wondered. Beard is better known for his theory that the Euro-American brain was so powerful that it could overwork itself into a condition called neurastheniastress or exhaustion. In his 1881 book American Nervousness, he wrote that the affliction that came to be known as Americanitis was caused by the technological advancements of modern civilization. One such advancement was the mental activity of women.30

To cure Americanitis, Beard prescribed that men harden themselves by working on cattle ranches, of course. Theodore Roosevelt would epitomize this transformation in American masculinity. He gained a reputation in the New York Assembly as an effeminate jane-dandy but returned from his time on the frontier with the stoic, aggressive cowboy bravado that would define and plague American masculinity for at least 100 more years.31

As president, Roosevelt popularized the term race suicide to describe the fear that excessively fertile immigrants would outbreed their racial betters. Calling it an unpardonable crime, in a 1914 article, Twisted Eugenics, he castigated women who chose to attend college or use contraception instead of focusing on repopulating the white race. Its not unlike the present-day fears of white genocide or the great replacement that youll find in the tweets of Iowa Representative Steve King or in the white nationalist literature uncovered on Trump senior policy adviser Stephen Millers e-mail server.32

Toughening up on the frontier also meant interaction with Indigenous tribes. Even Salisburys beef remedy was inspired by his observations of Native Americans. There is no reason why we of civilized communities should not live to an even greater age than man does in the wild state, he wrote. But its unlikely that Salisbury ever witnessed the healthy wild state of beef eaters, because cattle are not indigenous to North America.33

Beefs journey to the top of the American diet began with the near extinction of bison and the genocide and forced removal of Indigenous tribes who subsisted on hunting that animal. Cattle ranching becomes central to the dispossession of Native lands and the takeover of western ecosystems, Notre Dames Specht pointed out. Cattle are a tool of, and a justification for, taking that land.34

At the same time that American manhood was redefined as the strong, silent type roaming the western frontier, beef became hypercommodified, readily available and relatively inexpensive for the first time in history. The idea that beef is something you eat all the time is the product of industrial agriculture, its a product of cities, and its a product of the expansion of commodity markets, Specht continued.35

To have a seemingly limitless supply of beef was such a global novelty that it became a badge of Americanness. Immigrants would write home and say, Life in America is hard, but at least I get red meat all the time, Specht said. We can but wonder how the largely immigrant workforce at the JBS plant in Grand Island felt about receiving 10pounds of free ground beef as a coronavirus bonus.36

W here do you go these days to mingle with some of the thought leaders advocating for beef to remain a central part of the American diet? Out west. Last August, over 150 people came together for three days at the University of San Diego student center for the eighth annual Ancestral Health Symposium, a big-tent conference that encompasses paleo, keto, and carnivore people along with anyone else who wants to examine current health challenges through the context of our ancestral heritage, according to the Ancestral Health Societys website. Its a heterogeneous community with plenty of internal debate, but its members share an intense skepticism of the medical, nutritional, and scientific establishment and a celebration of real, natural, traditional food.37

This is the Wild West, man. This is the fringe that the mainstream poaches from, a sturdily built, sandy-haired chiropractor from Los Angeles told me as we looked out at a room of lean, mostly white attendees outfitted for functionalitywicking athletic shirts, yoga pants, five-toed shoes, Xero sandals, blue-light-blocking shades, and slick metal water bottles. He wasnt wrong. The ancestral health community has been on the front lines of reclaiming healthy fat from unfair criticism; despite critiques of the community as overly patriarchal, some feminists have praised ancestral diets as a respite from a culture that equates beauty with thinness, to quote Bitar. If you know about collagen peptides, circadian rhythms, gut microbes, or the dangers of inflammation, these people may have had something to do with it.38

Yet there remains the fact that humans must change our relationship to meat, especially beef, if we are to avoid ecological catastrophe, let alone improve the lives of meatpacking workers or help the animals themselves. But if meat is of essential value to human health, we seem to be in an existential bind, trapped between our perceived nutritional needs and the capacity of our ecosystem and labor force to meet them. In Can Seven Billion Humans Go Paleo? the writer Erica Etelson wondered, If theres not enough animal protein to go around without cooking the planet, who should be first in line? Thats the mostly unasked question at the heart of the meat debate: one of power and ethics, not fat and protein. Thats also the dilemma that many people grapple with (this soycialist writer included) as they eat the occasional burger, steak, or oxtail.39

Ive been called right wing for saying meat is healthy, said Diana Rodgers, a farmer and dietitian. Its very political, but it shouldnt be. Youre either a less-meat environmentalist or you eat a lot of meat and dont care about the environment. Rodgers was in the midst of debunking the EAT-Lancet Commissions planetary health diet, which aims to accommodate the growing global population and planetary limits. The guidelines allow for only one serving of red meat per weeka death sentence to the people in this small auditorium. Rodgers disclosed that the General Mills meat snack company Epic Provisions had paid her way to the conference to help promote her upcoming book and documentary Sacred Cow (the nutritional, environmental and ethical case for better beat, according to her website), which was cowritten by Robb Wolf, the author of the best-selling The Paleo Solution.40

Allan Savory: Former soldier, ecologist, rancher, and originator of the controversial holistic management approach to soil conservation. (CC-by-sa-4.0)

Rodgers argues that beef is the ideal food for the health of the planet because of the potential for holistic range managementan approach to cattle rearing popularized by Zimbabwean rancher Allan Savory and his namesake institute. To oversimplify, cattle are strategically moved around a plot of land in a way that mimics the millions of bison that grazed for thousands of years in North America. This grazing technique restores grasslands and revitalizes soil in a way that allows for substantialmaybe even earth-savinglevels of carbon sequestration. While holistic range management (and the prospect of carbon-neutral burgers) makes intuitive sense and has serious momentum, its also highly polarizing.41

There are credible scientists on either side of the Savory debate, including David Briske and Richard Teague, two professors in the same department at Texas A&M University. Savorys past as an officer in the Rhodesian Army hasnt done him any favors among his critics, who portray him as a delusional iconoclast with no respect for scientific rigor. But to his proponents, which include a growing list of farmers around the world, Savory is a misunderstood sage. The complexity and dynamism of his methods cannot be fully appreciated in summary form.42

If there is a middle ground between the dystopian reality of the beef industry and the unsettling vision of a world without animal agriculture posited by Impossible Foods CEO Pat Brown, holistic range management could be just that. It doesnt seem right that the Norwegian billionaire couple behind EAT-Lancet, Gunhild and Petter Stordalen, are allowed to prescribe diets for the rest of the world while they fly around in a private jet with their own carbon footprint unregulated. I was open to the possibility that the Shake Shack burger I ate the night before was not a personal moral failing but actually a righteous rebellion against the 1 percent. That would make life easier. Then an audience member asked Rodgers if there would be enough land to support a large population on the beef-heavy diet she recommends. She assured him there would be.43

And it could sustain the same population or more as an agrarian-based economy?44

Rodgers was visibly flustered. What I can tell you is that theres too many of us, she replied. Do we want lots of people fed like crap, or do we want healthy people? Our current system is completely failing and producing sick people and killing our environment. So regenerative agriculture is actually the only solution we have moving forward. And, you know, theres too many people.45

Perhaps Rodgers should have chosen an other title for her lecture than Feeding the World a Healthy and Sustainable Dietand other opponents than EAT-Lancet and Impossible Foods. At least their visions attempt to account for the worlds population as it exists. Only 3percent of the beef produced in the United States is designated as grass-fed; even less is raised by Savorys method. Any hypothetical solution in which factory farms transform into holistically managed ranges will ultimately have to confront the multinational agribusiness industry that has been consolidating power for decades. Eating beef is political, whether we want it to be or not. But what was most troubling about Rodgerss answer was her too many people declaration: In those thought experiments, its always the less powerful who count as extra. Its not necessarily right wing to say that meat is healthy, but to quickly revert to claims of overpopulation calls up the darkest strains of both the conservation movement and ancestral health diet literature.46

In 1975 a doctor named Walter Voegtlin self-published his foundational text, The Stone Age Diet, which told a story similar to Rodgerss about the lack of sufficient animal protein to feed a surplus population. Voegtlins solution included limit[ing] reproduction to superior types of individuals and practicing euthanasia of imperfect newborns. Rodgers and others who advise people to eat more meat surely dont endorse that approach, but its worth highlighting how similar their framing is: For some to thrive, others must disappear.47

The Blonde Buttermaker: This former vegetarian liberal has become an animal-fat-obsessed white nationalist.

I kept Rodgers and Voegtlin in mind toward the end of an interview with Tristan Haggard, the proprietor of the popular keto-carnivore YouTube channel Primal Edge Health, which is also the name of his diet brand. A gregarious former vegan, he had spent much of our two-hour Skype call building his case that the plant-based-food movement evolved out of the eugenics movement and is behind a conspiracy to depopulate the world by feminizing men through industrialized vegan kibble. His mantra, Eat meat, make families, is a response to what he sees as the growing cultural degeneracy of modern city life. Instead of being concerned with how you can feed your family or protect your community, men are taught about how cool they might look in a dress, Haggard said. Thats why he fled California to raise his family on a farm in the Andes Mountains in Ecuador. Now he lives like a 21st century primal maneating grass-fed steak, drinking raw milk, and creating content for his subscribers and clients about the dangers of modern soycial engineering.48

I told Haggard I had just heard Rodgers recite the same Malthusian talking points he attributes to vegans. Im glad you brought that up. Its important to read with nuance, he said. While he recognized that overpopulation arguments are usually directed at his neighbors in the Global South, hes appeared on the white nationalist publishing company Arktoss channel to talk up the carnivore diet as part of the fight against globalist hegemony, and hes also rushed to the defense of the Nazis kicked out of the farmers market in Bloomington, Ind. It seems that for Haggard, regardless of your political leanings, if youre on the side of more meat, youre part of the resistance.49

Haggard touts small-scale, local agriculture as a weapon against the globalists, yet he calls climate change a word game and factory farming a straw man argument. His fun-house mirror of inconsistent, repellent, and altogether weird beliefs is not uncommon among prominent followers of Weston Price, the godfather of the ancestral health movement. In 1939, Price published a flawed but compelling ethnography, Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, describing traditional preindustrial diets from the Alps to the Andes. He found several constants, the most important of which are the vitality of animal fat and the degeneration of peoples health after exposure to the Western industrial diet. Today his followers have translated his work into contemporary diet guidelines. Rather than eschew any specific food group, they focus on minimally processed food and old-world farming and food-preservation techniques.50

In the vendor room at the Ancestral Health Symposium, I spoke with a disarmingly friendly volunteer from the Weston A. Price Foundation about the pleasures of bone marrow and roasting vegetables in duck fat and another who was in the midst of shooting a documentary about grass-fed beef. The foundation is best known for Nourishing Traditions, the best-selling cookbook by its founder, Sally Fallon Morell, which popularized Prices work. While the pandemic has shown the importance of local, organic farms, which Prices followers have supported for years, theyre still easily dismissed as cranks because of their opposition to the scientific and medical establishment, as demonstrated by their commitment to unpasteurized dairy.51

Unfortunately, thats not the most controversial claim the foundations leaders have made. In 2018, Morrell wrote on her blog that the Earth stopped warming in the late 1990s and now is in a cooling trend, so we dont have to feel guilty for driving an SUV or eating bacon. The foundation doesnt have an official position on climate change, and when some of her followers protested in the comment section, she replied that the discourse around global warming reminded her of the relentless propaganda against animal fats. Like Haggard, she seems willing to embrace anyone sympathetic to her cause.52

In 2015, Morrell appeared on Red Ice Radio, a Swedish media platform that the Southern Poverty Law Center called one of the most effective white nationalist outlets on the Internet. Before it was banned from YouTube, Red Ice unveiled a cooking and lifestyle show hosted by a neo-Nazi domestic goddess named the Blonde Buttermaker. In an interview on the white nationalist channel NoWhiteGuilt, she spoke of how influential Prices work had been on her journey from former liberal vegetarian to animal-fat-obsessed white nationalist. In the wrong hands, emphasizing ancestral wisdom can be reinterpreted as a permission to embrace ethnonationalism.53

But Prices research does have value if read critically. In Diet and the Disease of Civilization, Bitar analyzes his work using the anthropologist Renato Rosaldos concept of imperialist nostalgia, in which agents of colonialism long for the very forms of life they intentionally altered or destroyed.54

Nowhere was such nostalgia more evident than during the symposium presentation by Paul Saladino, a young, charismatic, and totally shredded carnivore MD. Saladino described the uphill battle in consciousness to convince the world that plant fiber is unnecessary for human consumption. Repeating the ancestral health movements dictum that Indigenous cultures prized fat as a symbol of health and fertility, Saladino encouraged the audience members to swap their kale salads for rib eye and organ meats. He closed by invoking an Andean tribal saying, Wiracocha, which he translated as I wish you a sea of fat.55

Wiracocha was also used to describe Spanish conquistadors, whose white skin was foamy like fat. Its a coincidence that reveals the historical revisionism pervasive in this community. Throughout the weekend there were photographs of healthy, happy, well-fed preindustrial Indigenous groups. But there was no acknowledgment that the rise of cattle ranching depended on eliminating the means of subsistence for Indigenous tribesor that the destruction of foodways has been a deliberate strategy of colonial powers. The slideshows simply showed beautiful people victimized by the forces of nature, whose wisdom was now bestowed on us. A young woman asked Saladino what he would say to someone curious about the carnivore diet. Welcome to the tribe, he replied.56

A sympathetic look at this confused yearning for tribal belonging would take into account what Bitar discovered as the main recurring theme in paleo diet books. Surprisingly, it has little to do with food or nutrition. Our ancestors enjoyed a balanced life of working, playing, relaxing, and worshipping. They felt closeness to one another and everyone had purpose, Bitar said, quoting from Living Paleo for Dummies. Its a human need as basic as food: meaning and connection, especially in a country defined by loneliness and living through a second gilded age of economic inequality.57

This was made even clearer during the last presentation I attended, by a naturopath named Nasha Winters. She informed us that in the past three years, American life expectancy rates declined. The diseases of civilization now have companyopiate addiction, alcoholism, and suicide, the diseases of despair.58

Nowhere is the degeneration of the quality of life in the United States more acute than in the communities surrounding the meatpacking plants that dot rural areas. Americans do need better diets, but we also need to realize that while consumer politics might be transformative for individuals, as public policy, it amounts to window dressing. As University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz professor Julie Guthman noted in her book Weighing In: Obesity, Food Justice, and the Limits of Capitalism, the artificially low price of food has long functioned as a replacement for a living wage and a social safety net, and it comes with serious environmental and public health consequences.59

Over the past 100 years, from Upton Sinclair to Michael Pollan, many Americans have been curious about how the sausage is made. But what most of them really want to know is whether they can keep eating it. The public became concerned with the conditions inside meatpacking plants not out of a concern for workers health but out of worry for what meat shortages might do to their own. Sinclairs famous regret was that he aimed for the publics heart with The Jungle but hit them in the stomach instead. He hoped that exposing the horrifying conditions in meatpacking plants could spark a socialist uprising, but all he got was the Meat Safety Act of 1906.60

The logic that consumer prices are the highest good in terms of social policy, thatcomes from beef, said Joshua Specht. Any movement to reduce meat consumption must address the role that cheap beef has played in providing meaning and nourishment to the masses, or else that ground will be ceded to the Sebastian Gorkas and Donald Trumps of the world.61

The coronavirus pandemic and the looming global ecological crisis are collective problems that individual solutions wont be able to solve. But as Bitar writes, the best way to approach the question of diet is not to call out ignorance but rather to understand myths. When we examine these myths, we can see them truly as the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves, and, perhaps, a story for which we can write a better plot. As difficult as it is to forecast what America will look like after the pandemic, it could be enough of a ground-shifting historical event to spawn new storiesabout why we eat, what we eat, and what we must change to survive.62

Food is so much about who we are and who weve been. To just change that overnight is not really that easy, actually, said Specht. But food isnt just a building block for who we are, its a building block for the kind of society we want to live in. If we can ground our food system in a more rigorous understanding of history, perhaps then we can remake it as a reflection of the society we want to live in. That would be the real red pill, waking us to a new reality.63

Originally posted here:
How Red Meat Became the Red Pill for the Alt-Right - The Nation

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on How Red Meat Became the Red Pill for the Alt-Right – The Nation

The FoodNavigator Podcast: Sugar reformulation part 1: Why reducing by stealth is key – FoodNavigator.com

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:53 am

How best can the industry respond to this challenge, whilst at the same time responding to the often-fickle demands of consumers -- particularly in light of the current COVID-19 crisis appearing to accelerate the health concerns of shoppers keen to find foods that boost their immune systems? Or has it?

Professor Jack Winkler, former Professor of Nutrition Policy at London Metropolitan University and distinguished veteran of public health policy, is a keen advocate of sugar reformulation in the food industry, which he believes is vital given the obesity crisis in Europe and consequent effect it is likely to have on health systems.

However, he doesnt agree with mandatory reduction targets, which he thinks are counterproductive. He believes getting these products to appeal to the masses is paramount. Key to this, he believes is a term he coined: the unobtrusive strategy which involves reducing sugar in popular foods silently. We just do it and we dont boast about it, he said.

Holly Gabriel from the campaign groupAction on Sugar has been calling for interventionist measures from the UK government including bans on the advertising of unhealthy foods, mandatory nutrition labelling and mandatory reformation targets for the food industry in order to tackle the nations obesity epidemic, agrees in the reducing sugar by stealth approach.

A true reformation programme that can be really successful is work thats done incrementally behind the scenes to gradually reduce sugar in core line products that contribute most sugar and calories to peoples diets without anyone knowing about it or needing to know that work goes on, she observed.

But are her groups demands for mandatory actions to reduce sugar an example of the nanny state going too far?

Its important to consider that not all population groups have the luxury of choosing [their diets], she countered.In deprived areas people have less access to healthy and fresh foods and rely very much on convenience.

Food labels meanwhile make it very difficult to see the sugar quantities in products, she argued.

She warns that sugar is a major cause ofobesity that increases a persons risk of developing life-threatening illnesses.

About 1 in 3 children are obese by the time the leave primary school. This puts them at risk of later developing related conditions such as heart disease cardiovascular, type 2 diabetes and some cancers.

What do consumers make of all this? Laura Swain, an analyst at London-based Stylus, says consumers are conflicted.

Eating less sugar is clearly a high priority for thembut at the same time they still have the urge to indulge.

With that in mind, she suggests that food brands that cut sugar from everyday items that people want to eat every day offers them a golden opportunity to better connect with their consumers.

See the original post:
The FoodNavigator Podcast: Sugar reformulation part 1: Why reducing by stealth is key - FoodNavigator.com

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on The FoodNavigator Podcast: Sugar reformulation part 1: Why reducing by stealth is key – FoodNavigator.com

What to do with abandoned baby birds – Boston Herald

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:53 am

A few weeks ago, a robin built a nest on an electrical box on the side of the house. Sure enough, we saw four beautiful little blue eggs in it and eventually they hatched. Over the next 1-2 weeks these babies grew like crazy! We were careful not to disturb the nest and only peeked in once in awhile.

Just three days ago, we had a windy storm and the nest was knocked to the ground. What are the chances the babies survived? We looked around but couldnt find them and the protective mother was no longer in the area making a fuss. A neighbor also had a similar issue two weeks ago when she found a baby bird on its own. She tried to nurse it but it sadly died.

What do you recommend in these situations and if one were to try and rehabilitate a baby bird what do they feed them?

This time of year is a time for births and the recycling of life. As to the survival of the baby birds, it really comes down to whether or not they were old enough to fly. When did you see them last? Were they fully feathered and looking more mature? If so, it is conceivable that they did survive but if not, my guess would be that some kind of predator may have gotten a hold of them or they may have just hidden and, without care, might have died for different reasons including starvation. Chances of survival unfortunately can be slim in these situations.

What to do is a tough call. Begin by waiting an hour or two to see if the mother returns to care for its young. If not, my first suggestion is to take a baby bird or birds to a bird rescue facility or rehabilitation center, if there is one in your area. These locations have the experience and the supplies to provide the babies with the best chance of survival, fully understanding the specific type of bird and the dietary needs that it would have.

If one needs to try and feed a baby bird on their own, there are several things to keep in mind. Baby birds need constant feeding throughout the day only slowing down at night. This means feeding 1-3 times an hour with younger birds requiring more frequent feedings. The mother birds work very hard!

Do your best to ascertain the kind of bird it is since different birds need different diets. There is a lot of information on the internet as well but one can start with using canned dog food, hard boiled eggs or moistened dry pet food carefully delivered to the baby birds. Consistency of the gruel is important so make sure the food is room temperature, mushy and soft, but not too wet. Avoid bird seed, bird food, milk, water, bread, and even worms unless you know the bird species and it is part of their regular diet.

Hopefully you will be better prepared now should you face this situation again.

View post:
What to do with abandoned baby birds - Boston Herald

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on What to do with abandoned baby birds – Boston Herald

Op-ed: Its Time to Rethink the Food System from the Ground Up – Civil Eats

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:53 am

The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic shutdowns have severely disrupted and spotlighted weaknesses in the U.S. food system. Farmers, food distributors, and government agencies are working to reconfigure supply chains so that food can get to where its needed. But there is a hidden, long-neglected dimension that should also be addressed as the nation rebuilds from the current crisis.

As scholars who study different aspects of soil, nutrition, and food systems, were concerned about a key vulnerability at the very foundation of the food system: soil. On farms and ranches across the U.S., the health of soil is seriously compromised today. Conventional farming practices have degraded it, and erosion has shorn away much of it.

Iowa has lost about half the topsoil it had in 1850. Since they were first plowed, Americas farmland soils have lost about half of their organic matterthe dark, spongy decomposed plant and animal tissue that helps make them fertile.

The soil that produces our nations food supply is a weakened link slowly failing under ongoing strain. This breakdown isnt as dramatic as what happened in the 1930s during the Dust Bowl, but it is just as worrying. Human history holds many examples of once-thriving agricultural regions around the world where failure to maintain soil health degraded entire regions far below their potential agricultural productivity, impoverishing the descendants of those who wrecked their land.

We believe there is an urgent need to rebuild soil health across the U.S. This can help maintain harvests over the long run and lay a solid foundation for a more resilient food system. Investing in soil health will benefit environmental and human health in ways that are becoming increasingly apparent and important.

Wind erosion carries topsoil from farmland during the Dust Bowl, circa 1930s. (Photo credit: USDA)

Soil is the foundation of the U.S. food system. Fruits, vegetables, nuts, and oils come directly from plants grown in soil. Meat, poultry, dairy products, and many farmed fish come from animals that feed on plants. Wild-caught fish and shellfish, which provide a tiny fraction of the typical American diet, are virtually the only exception.

As populations around the globe ballooned over recent centuries, so did pressure to force more productivity out of every available acre. In many parts of the world, this led to farming practices that degraded soil far beyond its natural fertility.

In the Southeastern U.S., for example, agricultural erosion stripped soil from hillsides a hundred times faster than the natural rate of soil formation. Today farmers in the Piedmont, from Virginia to Alabama between the Atlantic coast and the Appalachian mountains, coax crops from poor subsoil rather than the rich topsoil that early European settlers praised.

Researchers, government agencies and nonprofit groups recognize soil degradation as a national problem and have started to focus on rebuilding soil health. The U.S. Department of Agricultures Natural Resource Conservation Service helps farmers improve the health and function of their soils. Nongovernment organizations are recognizing the need to restore soil health on agricultural lands. And the 2018 Farm Bill directed new attention and funding to soil health programs.

Beyond growing food, soils support human, public, and planetary health. Well before the current pandemic, experts in public health and nutrition recognized that modern agriculture was failing to sustain consumers, the land, and rural communities. This insight helped spur the emergence of a new multidisciplinary field, known as food systems, that analyzes how food is produced and distributed.

But work in this field tends to focus on the environmental impacts of food production, with less attention to economic and social implications, or to links between farming practices, soil health and the nutritional quality of food. Many studies narrowly focus on greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture when addressing soils and sustainability, without including the many ecological benefits that healthy soils provide.

To be sure, man-made climate change is a major long-term threat to human and planetary health. But soil health is just as critical in its own right. Human actions have already harmed agricultural productivity in areas around the world. And when soil is degraded, food production systems are less able to weather future challenges that we can expect in a changing climate.

The study of soil health can also have its own blind spots. Often agricultural research focuses solely on crop yields or the impact of individual conservation practices, such as adopting no-till planting or planting cover crops to protect soil from erosion. Such analyses rarely consider linkages driven by dietary demand for specific foods and crops, or the effects of farming practices on the nutrient content of forage and crops that sustain livestock and humans.

Food systems experts have called for transforming food production to improve human health and make agriculture more sustainable. Some researchers have proposed specific diets that they argue would accomplish both goals. But fully understanding connections between soil health and public health will require greater collaboration between those studying food systems, nutrition and how we treat the soil.

Now that COVID-19 has deconstructed much of the national food supply network, it would be a mistake to pour efforts into simply rebuilding a flawed system. Instead, we believe it is time to redesign the U.S. food system from the ground up, so that it can deliver both soil health and human health and be more resilient to future challenges.

What would it take to do this? The foundation of a revised system would be adopting regenerative farming methods that integrate multiple soil-building practices, such as no-till, cover crops and diverse crop rotations to restore health to land. It would also take creating and expanding markets for more diverse crops, as well as expanding regenerative grazing and promoting reintegration of animal husbandry and crop production.

And it would require investing in research into the linkages between farming practices, soil health and the nutritional quality of foodsand what that all could mean for human health.

In sum, we think its time to rethink the food system, based on a recognition that providing healthy diets based on healthy soils is critical to achieving a healthier, more just, resilient. and truly sustainable world.

Laura Lewis, Associate Professor of Community and Economic Development at Washington State University, and Dave Gustafson, project director at the Agriculture & Food Systems Institute, contributed to this article.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation, and is reprinted with permission.

See the article here:
Op-ed: Its Time to Rethink the Food System from the Ground Up - Civil Eats

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on Op-ed: Its Time to Rethink the Food System from the Ground Up – Civil Eats

In Reverse Gear – Daily Pioneer

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:53 am

Diabetes is battling for a cure worldwide, but a Pune-based doctor has been curating reversal of this lifestyle epidemic with a unique blend of diet, fitness and motivation, so much so that chronic patients even at age 60 plus, have managed to cure their insulin resistance and one of them has even turned into a marathon runner. MUSBA HASHMI tells you more

A 48-year-old Pune-based stock market trader, Santosh Bakare, suffered a heart attack three years back and had to undergo angioplasty. Later, he was diagnosed with Diabetes. To add to his woes, he gained weight. Just when Bakare had reconciled to living with his ailments, his wife Sonali came across an advertisement on Facebook, saying join this programme to completely reverse Diabetes.

The couple decided to give it a try. Because it was an ad, we were not fully convinced but as it was a matter of just `500, we registered for the session, Sonali tells you.

After attending the session, the duo was convinced that the programme would work wonders. Both registered for the Intense Reversal one-year programme in January 2020. In a matter of two months, Bakares Diabetes was completely reversed and soon after, he went off medication too.

I joined the programme to support my husband. Fortunately, my efforts didnt go in vain. I have been able to shed a whopping 20 kg in these four months while Santosh has managed to lose 15 kg. Now when I stand in front of the mirror, I feel more beautiful than ever. I cant put my feelings into words, Sonali adds.

Their 18-year-old son was apprehensive of about his parents and thought they were caught in a hoax. He kept telling us that this would be of no help, but we told him we were just trying it out. In a matter of days, the results were visible and he was happy. The lifestyle modification that we have gone through has not only helped us lose weight, but made us aware of our inner strength, Bakare tells you.

The man who has made this happen is a Pune-based motivational doctor, Pramod Tripathi. He helms the organisation Freedom From Diabetes with a network of doctors, specialists, nutritionists and fitness experts based in Pune and Mumbai.

Tripathi claims to have helped reverse Diabetes in around 6,000 people in the past eight years. There is a reason why he chose to concentrate on Diabetes. I have always been a dreamer. I wanted to live a purposeful life. After completing MBBS, I kept searching for what I wanted to do. I did an MBA. Then got into corporate and stress management. I realised in the corporate world people stay in touch with you only for a while. My calling was to do something sustainable. My wife, a Homoeopath, would often talk about how every patient got benefit from medication, except Diabetics. This got me thinking. I came across a book on reversing Diabetes and thought about doing something about it. We dug deeper and found that it merely requires lifestyle changes. This is how I started experimenting. I conducted a three-months programme and kept evolving. I am not a trained endocrinologist. I did my diploma in Diabetes management from Nanavati Hospital. But we have a huge following today, Tripathi tells you.

Interestingly, reversing Diabetes is not a miracle. It is a scientific and systematic process. First, the patient needs to understand its root cause in Type II Diabetics mostly it is insulin resistance. Which generally comes from diet, lack of exercise, and stress.

We start by spending a couple of hours helping them understand the disease. They realise that Diabetes is just like fever, medicines can help bring it down but the focus should be on eliminating the cause. That means, a patient can take lots of medicines and insulin, but it would just work like paracetamol which brings the fever down for 12 hours, Tripathi explains.

Once the patient understands the cause then there are four protocols implemented in a phased manner. It is the diet, exercise, inner transformation and the medical protocol.

For the diet segment, there are four phases. We start with giving up milk and milk products and switching to smoothies instead and replacing white rice with brown, he says.

Each patient is assigned a doctor, a dietician and a fitness expert. Around 12 per cent people become free from Diabetes in the second phase, which is the introductory phase. This phase goes on for four-12 weeks. Then comes the third phase the acceleration phase, where people start exercising at home. This phase can go up to four-eight weeks. For people who are overweight, we extend this phase by a couple of weeks. After the acceleration phase is over, we start the stress release module. I connect with patients in the morning and we work on stress relieving strategies. The three common emotions that we work on are anger, anxiety, and grief. This goes on for 28 days. If someone misses the live session then the recorded session is made available for him, Tripathi says.

Then comes the fourth phase which is the maintenance phase. It focuses on muscle building. Just becoming thin is not the solution. For the reversal to happen and stay for long, one needs to become stronger from within. More protein, more fruits and more oil are recommended in this phase. We set health goals for patients. When people take ownership of their goals, it makes a difference. For example, if someones muscle is 23 per cent the focus should be on making it 25 per cent. Every three months, the goals are reviewed. After five-six months, patients are in cruise mode. They know what to do and what not. After a year, when they step out of the programme, they know what they need to do for the rest of their life, he tells you.

But theres a catch. Different people respond differently to the programme. There are 80-year-olds who with 20 to 30 years long history of Diabetes but are now doing fine without medicines. However, everybody does not reach this stage. There are a total of seven levels to reverse Diabetes. Some may be able to reduce the sugar level in the beginning, while others in the second stage when they start the medicines. The third stage is where they stop the medicine, 45 per cent people are cured by these three stages, the rest 60 per cent people still need Insulin.

Tripathis annual batches have around 800 people, out of which 100 are usually from Bangalore or Chennai. The modules have grown now in their presence to include patients from India and abroad.

But as Tripathi insists, merely enrolling doesnt serve the purpose. One has to be motivated as well. It is all about inner clarity and motivation. If the patient will listen to the advice superficially, he will think he cant do it. To overcome this, all patients go through a proper phase to enroll in our programme. This is the first experimentation phase for them, so that they have some clarity about the disease. There are two phases that they need to go through, Phase 1 is to see how they respond, and Phase 2 is for them to assess how long they do it, he tells you.

The diet phase can be exhausting for some, but the good part is that the patients know that they are not alone in this. We have a WhatsApp group of patients, doctors and dieticians. The patient can put in the query on the group and within minutes a doctor responds. Patients can also keep in touch with other patients from around the world. There is a cross-learning process, they see the reversal happening in other patients which motivates them to follow the protocols, Tripathi explains.

The diet is an amalgamation of Ayurveda and Naturopathy mores. No one diet fits everyone.

Diabaetes come with a lot of related complications, but that does not serve as a setback. In some cases, the complications can be reversed too. Complication and reversal of complication is something that does happen to a certain degree, depending on how advance the complication is. We have now 306 patients of kidney reversal. Right now I am handling a person of four creatinine, he has been coming down to lower creatinine. Some degree of reversal can happen. In 1.5 creatinine the results are much better. We have a huge database of kidney patients. So, we have an interesting and rewarding experience with kidney reversal. Retinopathy is more challenging. But there has been mild to moderate results in that as well, however some cases required allopathic intervention. Neuropathy is troublesome. But we have people in dozen who have improved. Some of them take six months, while others take two years, depending upon the degree of damage. In case of a bad damage, there is no reversal as well, Tripathi explains.

Tripathi admits he is dealing with a lot of challenges in making the reversal claim for a disease globally known to defy a cure. These are both on medical and behavioural levels. There are patients who dont go off insulin even after the programme. Some with long standing Diabetes may go off insulin but not on tablets. With that, a lot of emotional issues come up. Patients dont understand why the results are not showing like in others. Then there are behavioural issues to be handled. When spouses join our programme, we encourage it because the reversal is much easier. If one person is following the diet and their family is not supportive, the challenge increases. We have done a lot of work on adult learning and behaviour. What we found is there is only one Diabetic in the family and the rest have several other health issues. We connect all the issues with insulin resistance and make the family sit together and listen. Then it makes sense for them and they start following our instructions. Behavioural challenges are more when family members dont buy the theory. Also, every case is different. We have handled so many cases so we know no two Diabetics are similar, he tells you.

The cost of the programme is `500 for the orientation, which is of two hours. "If someone signs up for the full year with a dietician and doctor, it costs `30,000. If a family member wants to join in, it is `6,000 with no dieticians. For those who cant afford to pay the full amount at one go, they can opt for instalment.

Amid the coronavirus scare, Tripathi has a few tips for Diabetics. It is true that Diabetics have a higher risk of getting infected with COVID-19, but, as long as their sugar levels are under control below 140, they are safe. Same for the people with blood pressure it should be under 130/090. After 140 the free radicals start accelerating and create inflammatory reactions in the body. If the sugar levels are under control, it becomes the preliminary protective shield. Ideally, we suggest BP levels under 110 but as long as the prevention is concerned below 130 is just as fine, he tells you.

Ask 65-year-old Pune-based marathon runner Vasudha Chavhan and she will tell you how Tripathi worked wonders on her. She went to him with a history of 14-year long Diabetes, but her dedication mixed with Tripathis expertise helped her beat the disease back in 2015.

My son told me about Tripathi and asked me to give it a try. He enrolled me into the three-month programme. Within two weeks, my Diabetes got reversed and I was put off insulin. In the next four weeks, I got rid of all Diabetes medicines, Chavhan, who is not on any medication for five years now, tells you.

There was a time when Chavhan was not able to walk even a few steps. It was sheer dedication that helped her transition into a marathon runner at age 62. In my three-month programme, I was put on a customised diet and was asked to do mild exercises. After the programme got over, Dr Tripathi motivated me to not give up and improve my stamina. I then started taking small steps in a nearby garden. I used to walk an hour a day. Soon after, I had to fly to Melbourne to be with my daughter. In those six months, I worked out at home. I walked the treadmill daily. By the time, I returned, I had started walking properly. That got me thinking about joining a gym. Exercising then became a habit. Soon after all this, I participated in a 5K marathon, then 10K which was followed by the Ladakh Half Marathon, she recalls.

Chavhans decision of becoming a marathon runner at 62 was supported by her husband and two children. I remember when I took part in the Ladakh Half Marathon, my son told me: Mumma you made all of us proud. That was the winning moment for me, she tells you.

The programme, she says, has changed her inside out. There was not a single moment when she felt like giving up. I am not much of a foodie. I didn't face any challenges. I followed the diet and all the instructions. The results are visible, she says.

Chavhans success mantra has been patience, exercising and following a diet. To achieve something, you have to give up something. Diet and exercising play a major role in the programme. You cant cheat on that. Also, meditation is the key. Even now, I meditate for at least 20 minutes before going to sleep, she says.

She has a piece of advice for those who think lifestyle modifications are a Herculean task. If I could do it at this age then any one can. One just has to have the passion for it. Since childhood, we offer sweets and chocolates to children as a token of appreciation. We teach them to be a good human being, we want them to do good in academics, but when it comes to their health, we dont pay much attention. It is important that parents work on their child's fitness from an early age. Either enroll them into fitness programmes or parents themselves should take charge of it, so that children know the importance of health and follow it for the rest of their lives, she says.

Bakare and Chavhan are not the only ones whose transformation stories will leave you in awe. Take the case of Saranya Rao. This 37-year-old, Pune-based Infosys worker, went off her three-year long Diabetes medicines in just three days.

My Diabetes was detected during pregnancy with my second child. I had to be both on insulin and tablets. In fact, I had to pump insulin three times a day which resulted in my skin turning purple because of the injections. Due to unstable sugar levels, I had to deliver a premature baby in eight months. After that I was on tablets for the next one-and-a-half years. I started gaining weight as well. I weighed 82 kg. This made me feel lethargic and affected my work. I was constantly in angst about my rising sugar levels, Rao says.

Rao, too, came to know about Freedom from Diabetes through Facebook ads. I started exploring. As I gathered information, I started understanding how things work. Convinced, I decided to join the intensive batch, she says. Within three days of joining the programme, her Diabetes medicines stopped. It felt that I was on top of the world at that time, she tells you.

As the programme proceeded, she noticed immense improvement in all aspects of her health. My Hba1c count (three-month sugar average test) reduced from 6.7 to 5.6, fasting insulin reduced from 15.7 to 2.6, all this just within two months. I lost a good 20 kg in five months, she tells you.

It felt like magic, she says. Due to my breathing problem, I have been taking an inhaler since a very young age. I don't know what it was but by following the protocol, my breathing has improved and I do not have to use an inhaler that frequently, she tells you.

Tripathi, meanwhile, is happy to tell you he has found his want curing people of a hitherto uncurable disease, with a combination of scientific lifestyle changes, strict diet changes, upping fitness levels and a lot of motivational talk that somehow has been firing his patients for stepping out of their unhealthy comfort zones.

Link:
In Reverse Gear - Daily Pioneer

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on In Reverse Gear – Daily Pioneer

5 things to consider before going on a diet – KSL.com

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:49 am

SALT LAKE CITY Does it feel like theres always someone you know who is starting a new diet with promises of weight loss and happiness?

Theres good reason for that. The weight loss industry raked in over $72 billion in 2018.

If you're considering starting counting calories or following a strict meal plan, here are five questions you should ask yourself first.

This is a big one. What will this diet look like in the long-term for you? What will you do after the "diet" is over? If you dont see yourself sticking to this diet for the rest of your life, it may not be the diet for you.

The reason being that once the 21 days, 30 days or even 80 days of the diet are over, youre likely to return to previous eating patterns. You might want to eat all the foods you restricted and missed out on during the diet and end up bingeing.

A diet with a strict meal plan also doesnt teach you how to choose foods on your own or in different social situations. Everything you eat is dictated by the diet plan.

A realistic diet is one that teaches you sustainable lifestyle changes and you could see yourself following the rest of your life. The best eating pattern for you is one that incorporates your favorite foods and shows you how to follow a balanced eating pattern within your overall lifestyle.

The problem with this is when you cut out entire food groups, there will likely be gaps in your nutrition.

Before embarking on a diet that excludes one or more food groups it is important to do your research. Find out what nutrients might be missing in your diet if youre not eating foods that were previously providing your body with important nutrition. Then find other ways you can incorporate them in your diet.

For example, a vegan diet is likely to be deficient in vitamin B12, as this nutrient is found mainly in foods of animal origin. However, vegans may be able to incorporate vitamin B12 in their diet by eating fortified foods or taking a B12 supplement.

In my experience as a dietitian, many people jump on the bandwagon of a popular diet without doing their research first. People cut out whichever food group(s) the diet regimen prescribes and don't replace those vital nutrients with other foods or supplements. This can be detrimental to health, especially if it continues on a long-term basis.

What do you want to result from this diet? Is it a specific weight, certain pant size, or something else? If your only focus is on weight loss, then is your desired weight and timeline realistic? Setting realistic goals with slow and steady weight loss is best because you are more likely to keep it off.

If a certain weight is your goal, keep in mind what youll do and how youll feel if you don't reach that magical number on the scale. Remember the scale does not define you or your success as a person, and maybe that number you chose isnt best for your body.

Look at all the positive changes you have made instead. Maybe thats eating more vegetables, saving money from not drinking a soda every day, or finding a form of physical activity you enjoy doing. Any of those positive changes count as a win.

As an alternative to focusing on the scale, I encourage people to focus more on lifestyle outcomes. How about setting a goal of being able to play with your kids at the park without getting completely winded, completing in a 5K, cooking dinner at home more often, or just feeling better in your body.

Choose actionable habits to implement that will move you closer to your lifestyle goals.

A lot of diets out there just plain arent safe, including those with very low-calorie diets, untested supplements, cutting out certain nutrients. Some have unpleasant side effects and can make you feel really crappy all in the pursuit of "health". If you have to suffer through a diet and feel crappy to lose a little weight, it is likely not worth it.

Before starting any new eating pattern its a good idea to see if there is any research or studies backing this diet. Find out what the science and experts say. Nutrition is still a relatively young field, but there are plenty of reliable sources you can look to for solid information on various diets.

A realistic diet is one that teaches you sustainable lifestyle changes and you could see yourself following the rest of your life.Brittany Poulson, registered dietitian

There is no doubt that mental health takes a toll when overly restricting and analyzing every calorie that passes our lips. What might start as an innocent attempt to lose a little weight can turn into an obsession. It can become isolating and depressing at times.

As we obsess over everything we eat, its easy to feel shame, guilt and regret for eating a single food not allowed on the diet or going over your daily calorie allowance. This should never happen. Never feel guilty about eating something. Sure, there are days when you may have eaten too much and you didnt feel your best afterward, but you can learn from that and move on. No need to be ashamed, feel guilty or turn to more restrictions in your diet because of food.

Embracing the fact that food does not hold a moral value (i.e. no food is "good" or "bad") can be pivotal in keeping good mental health when it comes to eating.

Also, keep in mind that being a smaller weight does not automatically equal happiness. If you are unhappy at a higher weight, I suggest really digging into what is truly making you unhappy before deciding a lower weight is your key to happiness.

After considering these five questions, if you dont feel comfortable with any of your answers I suggest not going on the diet. Instead, I recommend exploring other options.

As humans, our bodies crave consistency. Going on and off diets only puts stress on our bodies, which can lead to weight gain and underlying inflammation.

Instead, find a balanced eating pattern that incorporates a variety of foods (including your favorite foods), is realistic, sustainable, safe and makes you happy. This will look different for everyone and might take some trial and error.

Thats OK. If you'd help exploring what eating pattern is best for you, find a dietitian to help guide you on your journey.

Editors Note: Anything in this article is for informational purposes only. The content is not intended, nor should it be interpreted, to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition; Any opinions, statements, services, offers, or other information or content expressed or made available are those of the respective author(s) or distributor(s) and not of KSL. KSL does not endorse nor is it responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any opinion, information, or statement made in this article. KSL expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on the content of this article.

Excerpt from:
5 things to consider before going on a diet - KSL.com

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on 5 things to consider before going on a diet – KSL.com

MIND diet plan and foods to eat: What is the MIND diet? – TODAY

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:49 am

With its focus on eating a variety of plant-based foods like leafy greens, vegetables and fruit, along with limiting sugar and saturated fat, many experts agree that the MIND diet is a healthy eating plan with a number of benefits.

Michele Rudolphi, a registered dietitian in Fort Wayne, Ind., recommends the diet to her clients. Not only is this diet whole-foods based, it is high in plant foods (specifically vegetables) which are typically lacking in the typical American diet With my clients, I also find that not only does it help to stabilize their blood sugar throughout the day, preventing cravings, it also helps them enjoy the flavors found in whole foods again, Rudolphi explained.

Dr. Susan Fox, a vascular surgeon in Hollywood, Florida, also encourages her patients to adopt the MIND diet. Fox explained that the diet is high in vitamins and minerals naturally occurring in beans, legumes and vegetables which promote a brain-healthy diet without the peaks and valleys of insulin and sugar disruption.

She also pointed to the diets benefits to both gut health and mental health. "There is definitely a link between what we eat, [and] how we feel, Fox said.

Whether you go all in, or take a slow and steady approach, the MIND diet may be a great first step towards adopting healthier eating habits.

Start by adding in more color in your diet, especially green, blue, red and purple fruits and vegetables. Swap refined grain foods with more whole grains like quinoa, brown rice and 100% whole grain bread. Limit your consumption of red and red processed meat to no more than once a week and cut down on sweets by eliminating sugar-sweetened beverages.

If your lifestyle goals include better brain health, along with maintaining healthy blood sugar and blood pressure levels, the MIND diet is a good option to try.

Kristin Kirkpatrick

Kristin Kirkpatrick is the lead dietitian at Cleveland Clinic Wellness & Preventive Medicine in Cleveland, Ohio. She is a best-selling author and an award winning dietitian.

Link:
MIND diet plan and foods to eat: What is the MIND diet? - TODAY

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on MIND diet plan and foods to eat: What is the MIND diet? – TODAY

Pumpkin Seeds for Weight Loss: Are They Beneficial? – Healthline

Posted: June 14, 2020 at 5:49 am

We include products we think are useful for our readers. If you buy through links on this page, we may earn a small commission. Heres our process.

Pumpkin seeds, which can be enjoyed with or without their white shell, are a tasty and nutrient-rich food.

Research shows that they offer a number of health benefits, such as lowering blood sugar levels, improving heart health, and even reducing your risk of certain cancers (1, 2, 3).

Many people wonder whether pumpkin seeds can also help you lose weight.

This article examines whether pumpkin seeds are beneficial for weight loss, plus tips for incorporating them into your diet.

Pumpkin seeds are rich in nutrients known to support weight loss, such as fiber, protein, and unsaturated fatty acids.

One 6-month study in 345 adults on a low calorie diet examined the effects of dietary composition on weight loss. It found that fiber intake promoted dietary adherence and weight loss, independently of calories or any other nutrient (4).

Fiber helps increase feelings of fullness, preventing overeating between meals that may otherwise lead to weight gain or prevent weight loss (5).

The minimum fiber recommendations for adults to support overall health and weight maintenance are 1938 grams per day (6).

A 1/2-cup (72-gram) serving of pumpkin seeds with their shells removed provides 5 grams of fiber, while a 1/2-cup (23-gram) serving with shells provides 1.5 grams (7).

Protein is also known to play a supportive role in weight loss, helping improve appetite, prevent overeating, and promote feelings of fullness (8, 9).

A 1/2-cup (72-gram) serving of pumpkin seeds without their shell provides 21 grams of protein, and a 1/2-cup (23-gram) serving of seeds with their shells on provides 7 grams (7).

While pumpkin seeds are a nutritious, high fiber snack that can help support weight loss, its important to remember that moderation is key when it comes to your intake of any food.

Like other nuts and seeds, pumpkin seeds are energy-dense, meaning that they contain a substantial number of calories and fat in a small serving size.

For example, 1/2 cup (72 grams) of pumpkin seeds with their shells removed contains approximately 415 calories and 35 grams of fat (7).

If you were to eat 1/2 cup (23 grams) of pumpkin seeds with their shells intact, you would still be getting approximately 130 calories and 11 grams of fat (7).

When it comes down to it, just be sure that the quantity of pumpkin seeds youre eating fits into your overall calorie goals for weight loss.

While some people may be able to fit 1/2 cup (72 grams) of shelled pumpkin seeds into their diet, others may need to restrict themselves to a smaller serving size.

To minimize added calories and sodium, choose raw, unsalted pumpkin seeds, with or without their shell, to best complement a healthy weight loss diet.

Pumpkin seeds are rich in fiber, protein, and unsaturated fatty acids, which can all play a supportive role in healthy weight loss and maintenance. Choose raw, unsalted seeds to minimize your intake of added fat, calories, and sodium.

Pumpkin seeds can be enjoyed both with and without their shell. Pumpkin seeds without their shell are often called pepitas and can be identified by their smaller, green appearance.

Pumpkin seeds can be enjoyed in a number of ways, such as:

Note that pumpkin seeds contain phytic acid, which may inhibit the absorption of other vitamins and minerals.

If you regularly eat pumpkin seeds, consider roasting them or soaking and sprouting them to reduce their phytic acid content (10, 11).

Pumpkin seeds can be enjoyed raw with or without their shell and added to pasta dishes, smoothies, yogurt, and baked goods. If youre concerned about their phytic acid, roast or soak and then sprout them before eating.

Pumpkin seeds are a healthy food rich in nutrients that may support weight loss and maintenance goals, such as protein, fiber, and unsaturated fatty acids.

As with other nuts and seeds, pumpkin seeds contain a substantial amount of fat and number of calories in a small serving, making moderation important if youre on a calorie-restricted diet.

To best complement a weight loss diet, choose raw, unsalted pumpkin seeds either with or without their shells. These seeds can be added to a number of dishes or eaten on their own as a healthy snack.

Shop for raw, unsalted pepitas or in-shell pumpkin seeds online.

Link:
Pumpkin Seeds for Weight Loss: Are They Beneficial? - Healthline

Posted in Diet And Food | Comments Off on Pumpkin Seeds for Weight Loss: Are They Beneficial? – Healthline

Page 338«..1020..337338339340..350360..»