Category Archives: Lose Weight Fast

The path to losing weight is a strenuous journey that most of the world population takes. There are many different ways of losing weight, like exercising, different types of diet like keto or vegan diet, and calorie cutting. Each method of weight loss has its own risks and benefits, with benefits outweighing the risks by multiple folds.

Losing Weight

An important note to keep in mind when trying to lose weight is that the weight loss process should be slow and gradual. Fast and drastic weight loss can result in serious health consequences which would make maintenance of weight loss extremely difficult.

Read Also: Menopause: Beta-Blockers, Antidepressants and Insulin Promote Weight Gain

Calorie Cutting or caloric reduction has been labeled as one of the best and healthiest ways to lose weight if done properly. In a 2016 evidence-based study, researchers found that individuals who attempted to follow a strict cardio and workout program along with calorie-cuttinglost approximately 3.3 kgs more than those who just followed the exercise program, proving it to be extremely beneficial.

A normal healthy adult must intake a minimum of 1300 calories per day to not experience starvation and malnutrition. Thats the lowest baseline that can be set for people trying to lose weight using caloric reduction. If calorie reduction is any lower than this, there can be serious health consequences.

Apart from weight loss, the reduction of calorie intake is extremely beneficial in the long run resulting in a longer life span and prevention of serious conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and neurological disorders like Alzheimers.

Read Also: Obese Men with Hypogonadism Could Lose Weight and Keep It off with Testosterone Injections

When a person applies the principle of calorie cutting and keeps track of the number of calories consumed, the body starts to conserve energy when enough food is not consumed. This is an evolutionary mechanism to preserve energy until more food is made available. This conservation of energy results in a decreased body temperature which has been associated as an additional benefit of calorie cutting.

A new study by the Scripps Research Professors Bruno Conti, Ph.D., and Gary Siuzdak, Ph.D., and their teams have shown benefits of the temperature drop in the longer health span and weight loss associated with calorie reduction.

The initial works of Professor Conti couldnt definitely conclude if the benefits of calorie cutting were due to the actual caloric reduction or due to the temperature drop, or a mixture of both. His study could, however, conclude that temperature drop can increase the life span, independent of caloric reduction.

Read Also: Anti-Aging: HGH Can Reduce Biological Age by One Year and a Half Study Shows

In the new study headed by Conti and Siuzdak, the researchers aimed to answer the questions Contis initial study couldnt answer. They studied two groups of mice, both undergoing caloric reduction but one group was exposed to room temperature while the other group was exposed to a warmer temperature.

The researchers then studied the effects of temperature on these mice and found that temperature has an effect on metabolism, independent of the caloric reduction. The team lead by Siuzdak measured the metabolites in the bloodstream and the brain using their own technology called activity metabolomics. The aim was to find metabolites that were changed due to reduced calories or decreased temperature.

According to another experiment performed by the researchers, the metabolites that were responsible for the change in body temperature were applied in the form of a drug to help reduce weight and induce the associated health benefits of reduced temperature. This class of drugs, the temperature mimetics could be the next groundbreaking discovery for weight loss, although more research and studies need to be performed before they can be approved as a drug.

Read Also: Green Tea Can Help Obese People Lose Weight According to Study

Metabolic adaptation to calorie restriction

Related Articles:

HGH and Its Anti Aging Effects On The Skin

NAD Plus An Anti-Aging Supplement Could Play A Big Role in The Treatment of Cancer

Is The Cancer Drug Dasatinib The Anti-Aging Breakthrough We Have All Been Waiting For?

Growth Factor Plus

HGH Benefits: What to Expect From Using Human Growth Hormone

HGH Side Effects: Is HGH Worth the Risks and Are There Safe Alternatives?

HGH Deficiency Symptoms And Latest Testing Options

More:
Temperature Mimetics: A New Class of Drugs for Weight Loss and a Longer Life Span - Gilmore Health News

If you are troubled by obesity and have a habit of drinking tea, then you can reduce your weight easily. Yes, this tea which relieves fatigue and stress will now also help you in weight loss. Milk tea is made in our homes in a very simple way. Sometimes people add ginger or other hot spices to it to make it more healthy.

If you want to reduce your obesity by drinking tea, then make a habit of making it somewhat differently. Today we will teach you how to make a tea, which is known as Lemon Grass Chocolate Tea. By consuming this tea twice a day, you will see your belly fat decreasing within a few weeks. This tea is made just like daily tea, so you do not need to worry at all. Now lets know how to make this tea to reduce obesity Method of making tea

Method of making tea

Also read: mix these 4 spices in water for weight loss, can reduce 2 Kg weight in a monthHow does drinking reduce obesity

this Regular consumption of tea causes weight loss, constipation problem, blood pressure and stress. Also, by drinking this, your body will remain active and fresh throughout the day.

Benefits of lemongrass in weight loss

Consuming lemongrass helps to speed up your metabolism which leads to faster weight loss. This tea can be consumed as detox tea. Since lemongrass is a natural diuretic, if you consume it, there will be dirt in your body as urine. It cleanses the blood and removes the acne problem. Also a cup of lemongrass tea is an alternative remedy for stomach cramps and other digestive problems.

.

Continue reading here:
Weight Loss: Lose weight fast by drinking tea with milk without dieting, learn how to make it - Pledge Times

Mission, Texas:Many in the produce industry kept up with participants from this years Viva Fresh Clean Eating Challenge as they lost more than 160 pounds collectively from November 2019 to March 2020 by putting fruits and vegetables center plate. Their results were something to be proud of, particularly when you realize they achieved this during the holidays and a worldwide pandemic.

And now, the Texas International Produce Association (TIPA) is inviting industry members to register for the second annual Clean Eating Challenge starting on October 1 and culminates at the 2021 Viva Fresh Expo in Dallas next March. Those interested in joining the challenge have the option of joining one of two tracks: a featured contestant and a regular contestant. Featured contestants will have their progress highlighted online and as part of the reveal at the Viva Fresh Keynote reveal next March. All featured participants will also receive a FitBit and Fit Scale to better track their progress. Featured contestant spots are limited so interested parties are encouraged to act fast. But all contestants on all paths will receive peer mentorship and a chance to win a Peloton bike complete with year-long subscription (a $2,500 value) for completing the challenge.

Launched in 2019, Viva Freshs first-ever health and wellness campaign followedfour produce industry professionals who changed their diets and as a result, changed their lives.Since the inception of the Viva Fresh Expo, health and wellness has been a cornerstone of the program. The committee created the challenge to not only improve the contestants health, but also to inspire others and raise the profile of the importance of fruits and vegetables to a healthy lifestyle.

As leaders in the produce industry, we need to be at the forefront of health and wellness in order to set an example for the consumers we are trying to reach every day, remarked Dante Galeazzi, President & CEO of Texas International Produce Association (TIPA). As new health fads come and go, fruits and vegetables are the foundation on which we should focus every journey to better health. We are so excited to continue the Clean Eating Challenge for the second year in hopes of inspiring even more people to change their eating habits for the better.

The 2020 Challenge was sponsored by SunFed, Grow Farm Texas, Coast Tropical, Rio Fresh Inc. and J&D Produce; several participants from last years challenge and some new faces will serve as mentors who will offer peer support newcomers as they join the path to better health:

Besides peer support, contestants will receive healthy recipes and cooking tips and demos from professional chefs helping them move fruits and vegetables to center plate as they make healthy lifestyle changes.

One of last years participants said it best, The changes I learned to make during my time as a participant were truly life changing, said Michelle Cortez, Clean Eating Challenge Committee Chair. I want to help others find the same success I have found which will allow them to live their best lives and reduce their health complications.

Contestants are welcome to follow any plan they wish during the challenge but are encouraged to do so in coordination with a health care professional. The Clean Eating Challenge is not a diet but a way of life with a focus on health and wellness that asks participants to adopt a healthier lifestyle that includes eating more fruits and vegetables and moving more.*

Last year, Dr. Ian Smith, a best-selling author whose books havehelped hundreds of thousands of people reduce bad sugars from their diet, lose weight, lower blood sugar levels, and cut the cravings, worked closely with each of the participants to tailor a plan based on their goals, health challenges and the results of their physicals that showed exciting progress during the spring reveals. To close out the 2021 Challenge, Dr. Smith will once again join TIPA to deliver the keynote speech during the Viva Fresh Welcome Luncheon. He will highlight the new challengers success stories, along with updates from the year one participants.

Viva Fresh began in 2015 as a small regional tradeshow with the goal of shining a light on the importance of the Rio Grande Valley as an emerging trade corridor and production zone. Now, the show consistently draws sold out crowds, and buyer attendance alone has increased by over 110%.

For more information or to register for the Clean Eating Challenge visithttp://vivacleaneating.com/.

*Disclaimer: TIPA acknowledges they are not in the business of diet and weight loss and they are not qualified to offer health or fitness advice. TIPA is in the business of advocating for the increased consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables. TIPA will provide access to a variety of resource tools and support, but each participant will be responsible for seeking the necessary medical and expert advice related to their own health and well-being.

About the Viva Fresh Produce Expo

The Viva Fresh Produce Expo was established in 2015 by the Texas International Produce Association (TIPA) in order to create meaningful networking and educational opportunities for its members while shining a light on the importance of the Rio Grande Valley as an emerging trade corridor and production zone for healthy and nutritious fruits and vegetables available all year long. For more information, please visitwww.vivafreshexpo.com.

About the Texas International Produce Association

The Texas International Produce Association (TIPA) was founded in 1942 and represents over 330 member companies as they educate, advocate, promote and represent the fresh produce industry of more than $8 billion dollars that is either produced in Texas or considers Texas its first point of arrival for domestic distribution. For information, please visitwww.texipa.org.

Excerpt from:
Viva Fresh Expo Wants YOU: Join the Second Annual Clean Eating Challenge! - PerishableNews

After a long hiatus, boxing returned in the early summer months with a series of fight cards designed to get the business going. Those cards featured a handful of recognizable names and a few solid, if not spectacular fights.

Heading into the fall, it's time for the marquee events to take place -- with or without a crowd. Promoters have lined up some of the biggest and most meaningful fights of the year, and there's a lot to be excited about.

Here's a look ahead at the best matchups boxing has to offer in the final four months of 2020.

Oct.17, Las Vegas (on ESPN)

The matchup: Lomachenko (14-1, 10 KOs) is the best lightweight in the world and holds the WBA and WBO world titles and the WBC "franchise" belt. He sits at No. 1 in ESPN's pound-for-pound rankings. At age 32 he isn't old by any stretch, and his sublime skills are still undeniable. In 2019, he made easy work of Anthony Crolla (TKO4) and then won a one-sided unanimous decision over Luke Campbell. With his balletic movements in the ring, Lomachenko is still the "Baryshnikov of Boxing".

2 Related

The precocious Lopez (15-0 12 KOs) showed that perhaps everyone should believe the hype when he demolished Richard Commey in a second-round TKO victory in December to win the IBF lightweight world title. It was such a dominant and eye-opening performance that ESPN has him ranked at No. 2 at lightweight. He's got size and youth on his side, as well as the confidence that is needed to become an elite boxer.

Why this fight matters: In an age when fights are over-marinated and take too long before they're realized, this was one fight that broke the conventional norms of modern day boxing by coming together quickly. While Lopez just won his first world title, his team has been targeting Lomachenko for the past year. You have an elite fighter in Lomachenko, facing one of boxing's brightest young talents in Lopez -- and we really didn't have to wait too long for it. Who knows when a circumstance like this will happen again?

The intrigue: Despite having the same number of professional bouts on their ledger (15), Lomachenko is the much more experienced boxer. Lomachenko faced Orlando Salido and Gary Russell Jr. in his second and third bouts as a pro, respectively. And given his prodigious amateur career (396-1, if you've forgotten), Lomachenko is the more seasoned boxer and nine years older than Lopez, who is 23. But at what point does the ring mileage impact Lomachenko? On the other end, how will Lopez deal with the ring wizardry of Lomachenko? Will this moment simply be too daunting for him?

Sept. 26, Uncasville, CT (Showtime PPV)

The matchup: Charlo (30-0, 22 KOs) is the WBC middleweight world titlist, but many are still dubious of that claim because he was given that title when Canelo Alvarez was named the WBC "franchise champion.". But Charlo is an explosive and hard-hitting fighter. Derevyanchenko (13-2, 10 KOs) is a solid, well-rounded fighter who has competed very well at the top level at middleweight. In 2018 he lost a close decision when he challenged Daniel Jacobs for his IBF belt, and in October he lost a close unanimous decision against Gennadiy Golovkin, in a fight many believed Derevyanchenko had won.

Why this fight matters: This is a matchup between the No. 4 (Charlo) and No. 5 (Derevyanchenko) middleweights, according to ESPN, and based on styles, this should be an old-fashioned shootout. Charlo likes to be the aggressor in the ring, while Derevyanchenko isn't the type to back down from a fight. If Canelo decides to permanently move up in weight, the winner of this contest makes a strong claim for being the best fighter in the division.

The intrigue: For as much punishment as Derevyanchenko doled out to "GGG" last fall, he was also put through the grinder himself. There's a chance that neither guy will ever be quite the same. After holding up against the heavy hands of Golovkin, we still have to see how he will take oncoming shots that will come in even faster from Charlo. If Derevyanchenko's punch resistance hasn't been too dulled, look for another memorable slugfest.

Sept. 26, Uncasville, CT (Showtime PPV)

The matchup: This fight isn't just for three belts -- it will clearly decide who the best junior middleweight on the planet is. Jermell, just like his identical twin brother Jermall, is a WBC world titlist, having regained the belt by stopping Tony Harrison in 11 rounds in their rematch. Rosario went into Julian Williams' backyard in Philadelphia as a heavy underdog and promptly stopped him in five rounds to win the WBA and IBF world titles.

Why this fight matters: Anytime a unification bout occurs it's important -- and in recent years they have typically resulted in memorable fights, including last year's 140-pound battle between Josh Taylor and Regis Prograis. In an age when there are a plethora of "world champions" in every division, it's always a good thing when there are fights that can reduce the noise. Based on the ESPN rankings, this is pairing of the top two fighters at 154 pounds -- Charlo at No. 1, and Rosario right behind him.

The intrigue: Charlo may have recorded an 11th round KO over Harrison in December, but it was eye-opening to see Harrison have so much success inside, given that's not his preferred style in the ring. In his fight against Williams, Rosario showed that he is a strong, physical fighter who seems comfortable when in close. But was that just one great night where he caught lightning in a bottle? Or can he replicate that against Charlo?

TBA

The matchup: This fight is a true step-up bout for the ultra popular Garcia (20-0, 17 KOs) who, if you based it simply on social media following, is among the most popular boxers in the world. Now we find out if the telegenic 22-year-old is as skilled as he is marketable. Campbell (20-3, 16 KOs) is a stern test: he's a long, lean, well-schooled left-hander. Campbell, a 2012 Olympic gold medalist, is ranked No. 3 in the division by ESPN, and in recent years his only losses have been to Jorge Linares and Lomachenko -- and he had strong moments in both bouts.

Why this fight matters: This fight will tell us if Garcia truly has some steak to go with the sizzle. If Garcia passes this test, the entirety of the boxing world will have no choice but to take him seriously. The winner of this fight could be catapulted into a bout with current WBC lightweight world titlist Devin Haney.

The intrigue: It's very simple -- is Garcia ready? It's one thing to look impressive against Francisco Fonseca and Romero Duno, two of Garcia's KO victims in the first round, but in Campbell he is facing an experienced pro that certainly won't be blinded by all the flash surrounding Garcia. If Campbell is able to unfurl his right jab from the outside and stays away from the lethal left hook counter of Garcia, what's Garcia's plan B?

Nov. 21, Uncasville, CT (PPV)

The matchup: Spence (26-0, 21 KOs), the reigning IBF and WBC welterweight titleholder, is coming off a hard-earned decision over Shawn Porter last September. But a lot has happened since then. Less than a month after that fight, Spence was involved in a one-car accident where he was violently ejected from his vehicle. Prior to that, this matchup with Garcia was scheduled for January. Garcia (36-2, 21 KOs), a former unified titlist at 140, has been a solid. if not dominant, welterweight, winning a vacant WBC belt against Robert Guerrero, and then dropping two close fights against Keith Thurman and Shawn Porter. Garcia is rated No. 6 by ESPN at 147.

Why this fight matters: In terms of legacy, for Garcia, I think a victory could put Garcia on a path to Canastota and induction into the International Boxing Hall of Fame. As for Spence, who is ranked No. 1 at welterweight by ESPN, it could be another solid victory on his ledger and offer evidence if there are no long-lasting effects from his auto accident.

The intrigue: What version of Spence do we have at this moment? We can hear glowing reports about how Spence looks working out from his trainer (and what else do you expect Derrick James to really say?), but until we see him take a punch to his jaw -- and Garcia has some serious power, especially with that left hook -- Spence is the great unknown. It's hard to imagine that being thrown out of the car, losing teeth and suffering lacerations on his face didn't leave some kind of long-term physical toll. Until we see evidence proving otherwise, there will be doubts.

Oct. 24, London, England

The matchup: The 22-year-old Dubois (15-0, 14 KOs) is considered the best young heavyweight in the sport, and this big, strong fighter is quickly improving from a technical standpoint. He seems to be on the fast track, as he's already rated No. 3 by the WBO. Dubois scored five stoppage victories in 2019, and took care of Ricardo Snijders in his 2020 debut on Aug. 29. Joyce (11-0, 10 KOs) is a bit stiff and robotic, but he's also a fighter that never stops throwing punches and has natural physical strength. Neither man is going to hesitate to push forward and pursue the knockout.

Why this fight matters: It's rare that you see a matchup of two undefeated heavyweights before they get to a title shot. In this case you have a fight that looks to have plenty of fireworks. From this fight, a legitimate contender will emerge.

The intrigue: Dubois thus far has certainly passed the eye test. In Joyce, he's facing the first fighter of a caliber that will be able to fight back. Dubois is the more fluid fighter, and he will beat Joyce to the punch consistently early on. But what happens if Joyce stands up to the early onslaught and takes Dubois into deep waters? In 15 professional bouts, Dubois has only reached the fifth round three times, with one fight, against Kevin Johnson, going to a 10-round decision.

Oct. 24, Uncasville, Connecticut (Showtime PPV)

The matchup: Davis (23-0, 22 KOs) is one of the young stars in the sport, and thanks to his hard-hitting style, he has become a legitimate ticket seller. Since his last fight, however, he's had personal issues in recent months that include domestic violence charges filed against him in February.

Davis is currently ranked No. 4 by ESPN at lightweight. His toughest fight to date as a professional prizefighter has come against the scales. Davis was stripped of his first world title for failing to make weight for a title defense in 2017, and he has required multiple attempts to make the limit for several other key fights, including his most recent title defense against Yuriorkis Gamboa in December. In Santa Cruz (39-2-1, 19 KOs), Davis is facing an accomplished fighter who has won major world titles at 122, 126 and 130. At his best, Santa Cruz is an active puncher that relies more on volume than sheer power.

Why this fight matters: A victory over Santa Cruz will represent the most significant win of Davis' career, while Santa Cruz could cement his Hall of Fame status by handing Davis his first professional loss. Stylistically this fight should be pretty entertaining. Davis is an aggressive puncher who has power in both hands and Santa Cruz has never been shy about mixing it up.

The intrigue: Will Davis make weight? That's the key factor. The WBA just couldn't help themselves by sanctioning this as both a 130- and 135-pound title fight. That could give Davis a safety net if he struggles to make 130. And that is key, because Santa Cruz has had one fight at 130 pounds, and he looked relatively unimpressive against Miguel Flores last November. If Davis makes 130, Santa Cruz (ranked No. 8 at junior lightweight by ESPN) has a real shot in this fight. At 135, this bout could be a blowout in favor of Davis.

Oct. 31, Las Vegas (ESPN+)

The matchup: Inoue (19-0, 16 KOs) isn't just the premiere bantamweight in the world, but one of the very best fighters pound-for-pound (No. 4 by ESPN). He's a dynamic offensive machine, and despite having just 16 fights on his record, Inoue has one of the best rsums in boxing. He has won major world titles in three divisions, and last year he added the Muhammad Ali Trophy to his mantle by winning the World Boxing Super Series bantamweight tournament, defeating future Hall-of-Famer Nonito Donaire in a memorable clash.

Moloney (21-1, 18 KOs) is a legitimate bantamweight contender, currently listed at No. 8 by ESPN, whose lone loss was a close decision challenging Emmanuel Rodriguez for the IBF bantamweight title in 2018. He's a solid, well-rounded boxer/puncher.

Why this fight matters: Originally, Inoue was scheduled to face WBO 118-pound world titlist John Riel Casimero, but that fight was scrapped due to the coronavirus pandemic, and became a casualty of the new economics that presently exist in the sport. But in Moloney, Top Rank has found a respected opponent in what will be Inoue's promotional debut.

The intrigue: Will Inoue be affected by ring rust? He hasn't fought since last November. Moloney, on the other hand, fought on June 25 and scored a seventh round TKO of Leonardo Baez. Moloney is good enough that if Inoue has a bad night, it could be a difficult night for the champion.

Nov. 14 or 21, TBA

The matchup: This is a battle of two top-10 heavyweights (Povetkin No. 5, Whyte No. 7, respectively, in the ESPN rankings) and on Aug. 22 at Fight Camp, they put on one of the most memorable contests of 2020. Whyte (27-2, 18 KOs) seemed to be in full control after sending Povetkin (36-2-1, 25 KOs) down twice in the fourth round. The end looked inevitable for the 41-year-old Russian, until Povetkin uncorked a massive left uppercut in the following round that knocked Whyte out cold. It was one of the most dramatic and sudden turns in recent memory. And with that, Whyte, who had been the WBC mandatory challenger for almost three years, lost his number one position with the organization.

Why this fight matters: An inside track at the WBC title is on the line. Not too long after the first fight, Whtye and his promoter Eddie Hearn invoked the rematch clause that was in the fight contract. The WBC had finally stated before this fight that their WBC mandatory against current world titlist Tyson Fury would be due, but with Whyte losing that became a bit muddled. Whomever finds themselves as the winner of this rematch will find himself in a very good position for a title opportunity at some point in 2021.

The intrigue: While you have to admire the willingness of Whyte to go right back in there to right a wrong versus Povektin, you wonder if it's prudent to come back so quickly after the circumstances of their first bout. He didn't just lose, he was knocked out rather viciously. In any other situation, how many boxers would choose to go right back into the same fight so quickly? But perhaps the lure of that No. 1 spot in the WBC necessitates this decision.

1:08

Mark Kriegel breaks down Oscar Valdez's latest win and wonders how he will fare against WBC lightweight champion Miguel Berchelt.

TBA

The matchup: Berchelt (37-1, 33 KOs) currently holds the WBC junior lightweight world title, and the consensus is that he's the world's best 130-pounder. He's an overwhelming physical force inside the ring, he has good size and attacks his foes with an avalanche of unrelenting offense. Valdez (28-0, 22 KOs), the former WBO featherweight world titlist, remains a fan favorite, and he stopped veteran Jayson Velez in 10 rounds back on July 21. Currently, ESPN lists him ninth at 130.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter to stay up to date with all of our latest boxing news.

Why this fight matters: It's your classic shootout between two proud Mexican-born prizefighters who have a rivalry that dates back to crossing paths in their amateur days. More than a belt is on the line here -- pride is also at stake. For Berchelt, a victory over Valdez would represent one of the biggest name on his ledger, while Valdez is still looking to show that he is not damaged goods post-Scott Quigg. The truth of the matter is neither Berchelt nor Valdez has ever had as meaningful a fight as this one during their championship runs.

The intrigue: Once and for all, we will find out if Eddy Reynoso is the right fit for Valdez as a trainer, even though Valdez was undefeated with Manny Robles Jr. in his corner. Valdez and Reynoso have had four outings together, and the reviews have been mixed. They say that Rome was not built in a day, but it's fair to say that they have had more than ample time to gel as a union. Whether it's fair or not, this fight is a referendum on the Valdez-Reynoso tandem. Everything they have worked on the past year or so will now be judged on this fight.

Sept. 26, Munich, Germany

The matchup: Finally, they meet. Originally, Dorticos (24-1, 22 KOs) and Breidis (26-1, 19 KOs) were scheduled to meet in late March, and then May in the World Boxing Super Series cruiserweight division final, before the world shut down due to the coronavirus. Many wondered if the WBSS would resume, and here they are. It should be an entertaining fight between the hard-punching Dorticos and the well-rounded Breidis. This matchup now taking place in Germany probably favors Dorticos, as it's a much more neutral setting than Breidis' home country of Latvia, where this fight was originally scheduled.

Why this fight matters: First, it's for the Muhammad Ali Trophy, which is given to the winner of the WBSS tournaments. In the past you've had such luminaries as Oleksandr Usyk, Josh Taylor and Naoya Inoue walk away with this hardware, and they each left the tournament with much higher profiles internationally. Winning the WBSS is a big deal. Also, this is another pairing of No. 1- (Dorticos) and No.2- (Breidis) ranked boxers in this division. It doesn't happen nearly enough in boxing today, and when it does, it should be appreciated.

The intrigue: Which boxer will be more impacted by this fight being postponed twice? As you saw recently with the bout between unified junior welterweight champion Jose Ramirez and Viktor Postol -- who saw their bout get backed up twice as well -- layoffs will affect different fighters in a variety of ways.

Originally posted here:
The 10 can't-miss fights for the rest of 2020 - ESPN

Bellator is back with a doubleheader this weekend -- two cards on two straight nights at Mohegan Sun Arena in Uncasville, Connecticut.

Bellator 245 is Friday night, headlined by a rematch between former UFC light heavyweight champion Lyoto Machida and former Bellator light heavyweight champion Phil Davis. In the co-main event, former UFC title challenger Cat Zingano makes her Bellator debut against Gabby Holloway.

In Saturday's Bellator 246 main event, Juan Archuleta meets undefeated prospect Patchy Mix for the vacant bantamweight title. Also on that card, Jon Fitch meets Neiman Gracie in a welterweight bout and Liz Carmouche makes her Bellator debut.

It'll be a busy few days in Uncasville with titles, legacies and future glory on the line. Let's take a look at the top five storylines going into the weekend.

If this fight seems to be straight out of the UFC in the early 2010s, that's because it is. Machida and Davis fought at UFC 163 on Aug. 3, 2013. It was the co-main event of a card headlined by Jose Aldo defending his UFC featherweight title against "The Korean Zombie," Chan Sung Jung. Davis won by unanimous decision.

Fast-forward seven years, and the two men are meeting again in Bellator, each at somewhat of a crossroads. A win here is crucial for both.

Davis, 35, has won two straight, and his lone loss in the last three years came against new Bellator light heavyweight champion Vadim Nemkov in a very close 2018 split decision. A win over Machida could potentially get him a title shot, a chance to become a two-time champ. Machida, meanwhile, had his four-fight winning streak snapped in a close one against Gegard Mousasi in a September 2019 middleweight bout. "The Dragon" is 42 years old now. It's unclear how much time he has left in the sport. But if he can somehow beat Davis, it would show he's still right there, able to compete in both the light heavyweight and middleweight divisions.

1 Related

Don't call him Patrick. Sure, that's Mr. Mix's given first name. But his family and friends have called him Patchy since he was a kid, and that's what he prefers. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, let's talk about what Mix has accomplished in his career in somewhat quiet fashion. The native of western New York is undefeated, has finished his last eight wins and has looked fantastic in his three Bellator fights. Mix, 27, owns a finish over current UFC fighter Andre Ewell. There's little doubt he's a top bantamweight prospect. Just ask his coaches at JacksonWink MMA, who rave about him.

On Saturday, Mix has a chance to become champion in Bellator's bantamweight division, where the title has been vacant since Kyoji Horiguchi surrendered the championship last November while recovering from injury. Both Mix and Juan Archuleta are excellent but unheralded fighters. Bellator could really use a "homegrown" talent -- one who has never fought in the UFC -- to emerge as a star. Mix (or Archuleta) could end up being that fighter. A finish in a headlining title fight could propel him.

In terms of high-level opposition for featherweight champion Cyborg on the current Bellator roster, Zingano stands out. She's a former UFC bantamweight title challenger and has headlined UFC cards. Zingano owns a win over the best female fighter on the planet right now, Amanda Nunes. So there would certainly be a fair amount of interest in Cyborg vs. Zingano for the Bellator women's featherweight title.

First, though, Zingano has to beat Gabby Holloway in her Bellator debut Friday night. Zingano has fought only once at featherweight, a bizarre loss to Megan Anderson at UFC 232 in December 2018. She'll certainly be the favorite against Holloway, and a victory is likely to get her Cyborg next. But Zingano hasn't competed since that Anderson loss, and given her inexperience in the heavier weight class, it'll be very interesting to see if she can make good on the path that Bellator has set out for her.

Monday through Friday, host Pablo Torre brings you an inside look at the most interesting stories at ESPN, as told by the top reporters and insiders on the planet. Listen

Fighting a teammate is a taboo topic in MMA. Two training partners fighting doesn't happen very frequently, and most fighters don't even want to entertain the idea of getting in the cage with someone so close to them. The philosophy happens to be way different when it comes to Carmouche and Bellator women's flyweight champion Ilima-Lei Macfarlane. They actually want to fight each other. Macfarlane has said she'd be excited about giving her longtime confidante with Team Hurricane Awesome in San Diego a crack at her belt.

That very well could be the direction Bellator goes in, too. Carmouche is legitimately one of the best 125-pound female fighters in the world. Before joining that weight class, she was a top 135-pounder. She fought in the first UFC women's fight against Ronda Rousey in 2013. To get the title shot she's after, Carmouche will need to win Saturday against veteran DeAnna Bennett and Macfarlane will likely have to defend her belt against Juliana Velasquez. If both fulfill their ends of the bargain, it could be teammate vs. teammate for the Bellator title in 2021.

Back in the mid-to-late aughts, Fitch was basically the second-best welterweight fighter on the planet. The problem for him was that Georges St-Pierre -- the best welterweight of all time -- was in the way of Fitch becoming a champion. GSP beat Fitch at UFC 87 on Aug. 9, 2008. After that, Fitch went unbeaten in six straight, further establishing himself as the runner-up to GSP's crown during that era. Fast-forward more than a decade later, and Fitch is still -- somehow -- racking up wins at age 42. Fitch, the former World Series of Fighting welterweight champion, is unbeaten in six straight and has not lost since 2014. In that time, he has beaten Paul Daley, Jake Shields and Yushin Okami, none of them slouches, and has fought to a draw with Rory MacDonald.

Neiman Gracie, nephew of Renzo, is Fitch's opponent Saturday. Gracie lost his undefeated record to MacDonald in his last fight. This is very much a fork-in-the-road fight for both Grace and Fitch. Each man is trying to maintain traction in the Bellator welterweight division. For Fitch, it's another chance to cement himself as one of the most underrated fighters in MMA history and get closer to another title shot.

More:
Bellator 245 and 246 - Five things to look for on a busy weekend - ESPN

Connect

Share

Share

Email

Pirelli Tires is expanding its all season tire range with 22 new sizes between 16 and 19 inches in the Cinturato All Season Plus and Scorpion Verde All Season SF Families.

These are available for the aftermarket with Seal Inside technology as well: a system from Pirelli that allows motorists to keep driving even with a puncture. With these new sizes, Pirelli will be able to cover around 90% of the potential All Season market.

The Cinturato All Season Plus, for cars with 15 to 20 inch wheels, is designed for people who primarily drive in cities without having to worry about weather or regulations that oblige winter tires. This evolution of the original Cinturato All Season range benefits from a special directional tread pattern design that optimises water expulsion through two wide longitudinal and lateral channels, reducing aquaplaning. The innovative design also means reduced noise, both on the inside and the outside, enhancing driving pleasure. Another distinctive trait of the new Cinturato All Season Plus is its 3D blades. The pattern is designed to optimise the movement of the tread blocks to guarantee better performance under braking and through corners. This also makes the wear profile of the tire more even, while extending tire life. In snowy weather, the blocks open out and capture snow, delivering excellent roadholding. Thats why the All Season Plus is marked with the M+S symbol as well as the three-peak mountain snowflake symbol: the hallmark of total safety in winter conditions.

Pirelli offers the Scorpion Verde All Season SF for drivers of SUVs or crossovers: a tire well-suited to both summer and winter thats also marked with the M+S as well as the three-peak mountain snowflake symbols, guaranteeing safety in cold weather. The specific design of the tread pattern and blocks delivers excellent handling both in snowy and wet conditions, with perfect traction and lateral stability, along with low road noise. Completing the attributes of this tire is a long life and low rolling resistance, helping to save money on fuel.

The All Season range is rounded off by the Carrier All Season for vans and light commercial vehicles. This tire is very easy to drive, with a long life, low rolling resistance and excellent performance in all conditions. Furthermore, the Carrier All Season is a class leader in wet conditions and equipped with the M+S and three-peak mountain snowflake symbols to guarantee performance in moderate winter conditions.

The Cinturato All Season Plus and Scorpion Verde All Season are also available with ground-breaking Seal Inside technology, which allows drivers to keep going with no loss of tire pressure, in case of punctures up to four millimetres. It works thanks to a special mousse on the inside of the tire, which instantly wraps around any foreign object puncturing the tire and so prevents a loss of air pressure. Once the object is removed, the mousse expands to further plug the gap. This mousse is in turn covered in a special film that also protects it before the tire is fitted to the wheel. The Seal Inside option extends the mobility of the car with no worries, guaranteeing performance in all conditions and protecting against punctures.

Scorpion Verde All Season tires are also available with Pirellis Self-Supporting Run Flat option, guaranteeing safety without compromising driving pleasure. These tires are specifically designed to keep the car stable in the event of a puncture, allowing motorists to drive another 80 kilometres safely at a maximum speed of 80kph. It works thanks to reinforcements built in to the tires sidewall, which are capable of supporting the weight of the car as well as all the forces acting on it: even with no internal tire pressure.

Read more:
Pirelli expands its all season tire range with 22 new sizes - Traction News

Photo illustration by Slate. Photo by Getty Images Plus.

This is part of Six Months In, a Slate series reflecting on half a year of coronavirus lockdown in America.

With coronavirus cases still climbing in many states, normal isnt returning anytime soon. The prospect of a vaccine arriving within a matter of months is incredibly optimistic, and even then, it will probably not fix everything. It can easily take longer than a week to get COVID-19 test results back, making tests tricky to use as a tool to safely see grandparents or travel to states with a lower case count. Many of us will be working from home well into the next year; other workers must factor the risk of illness into their lives for the foreseeable future. Millions more have lost jobs, with federal help nowhere in sight. Thanks to the governments botched handling of the pandemic, staying socially distanced and restricting our activities to at least some degree is all we can do, for now.

The situation is miserablebut six months in, were more settled into the reality of life during COVID. The daily shock of our collective circumstances has mostly worn off. So in search of small reasons for optimism, we asked Slate staffers about the things they dont hate about this new and constrained world. In a pandemic thats taken so much, heres what weve been glad to give up. Shannon Palus

Everyones talking about how the pandemic heralds the end of handshakes, but hugs are the far more deserving casualty. It seems unimaginable now to expose yourself to the virus by wrapping someone outside of your quarantine bubble in an embrace, potentially thrusting your face into a cloud of the other persons infected respiratory droplets. The truth is, hugs have always been a fraught endeavor. They require an unreasonable level of emotional intelligence, coordination, and spatial reasoning. To hug, one must first grapple with a rapid succession of difficult questions upon saying hello or goodbye to someone; answer any of them incorrectly and you might commit a hugging faux pas. Do I know this person well enough to hug? Should I start with a handshake and transition into a hug? Am I going to seem cold and distant if I dont go in for a hug? How close do I need to get to this person? Where do I put my hands? How long should this last? Do I smell? Should I maybe just play it safe and stick with a side hug? And things become even more complicated when you add in variables like height differences. (Have you ever tried hugging a child? Its awful.) Hugs should only be tolerated for your parents, grandparents, and significant others. Im glad that, over the past few months, Ive only had to wave. Staff writer Aaron Mak

Back in the days when I put on shoes and went to an office, my lunch-making efforts were sporadic. Sometimes Id pack leftovers or remember to throw together a sandwich. Most of the time, Id fail to plan ahead and Id end up paying $8 to $13 for a mishmash of food in a brown paper bowl. There were salads, grain bowls, and hummus-based mlanges of varying qualityoccasionally delightful but usually somewhere between pretty good and meh. In the six months Ive been working 5 feet from my refrigerator, I havent had a sad brown-bowl lunch once. Making my own lunch takes me less than 20 minutes, about the same amount of time it used to take me to walk to and from my former brown-bowl haunts. The results of my lunchtime labors are occasionally delightful but usually somewhere between pretty good and meh. In other words, I am enjoying lunch just as much (or as little) as I was before, and Im not spending upward of $35 a week for the privilege of being too lazy to wash and chop my own kalea financial decision that seems indefensible now that Im no longer making it. Ive also discovered that better-than-store-bought hummus is extremely easy to make at home. With all the money I save on my new no-brown-bowl plan, I can more than afford the good tahini. Staff writer Christina Cauterucci

Theres a serious deficit of fun activities during the pandemic. Concert venues, museums, and public pools are closed in many places, and large social gatherings like weddings and house parties remain risky. But it turns out theres an upside: With nothing cool to miss out on, the fear of missing out has largely evaporated. While a toned-down summer hasnt exactly been fun, there hasnt been much FOMO driving us to do stuff we dont really want to do. In normal times, FOMO is always persuading me to go to loud, crowded bars with friends even when Im tired and worn-out from the week. Back when vacations were a thing, FOMO made me feel obligated to see the local sights, even if I felt more like relaxing on a beach or watching Shark Tank reruns in a cheap motel room. FOMO has been a brutal force for much of my life, really. In eighth grade, I participated in a jalapeo-eating contest, despite my low tolerance for spicy food and distaste (at the time) for jalapeos specifically. It did not go well. Without FOMO, we can follow our own taste and focus on whatever fun is immediately available to us. For me, that means watching a lot of low-quality cooking videos on YouTube, playing trivia games with my girlfriend, and learning how to play the theme song from Cheers on piano. None of these activities is anything to brag about, but at least Im not anxiety-spiraling about everything I could be doing instead. Audio producer Cameron Drews

Im a chronic overpacker, and back when I regularly left the house and went places, my bag was stuffed with things: water bottles and too many snacks; toys for my child; a changing pack with diapers and wipes; single-serve packets of Advil; a charging block and cord for my phone; a printed-out map, in case my phone lost service at a crucial moment; and magazines, in case my phone lost service and I then had to wait in a line. Not that I just threw things in without consideration. The exact content changed with each individual excursion. What will I need in my tote bag to go to a restaurant with friends? A trip to the Pawpaw Festival? The hour-and-a-half drive to the nearest Whole Foods? The uncertainty! I always erred on the side of more. Now, I go to four places outside my house, and one of them is on my property. I go to the creek with my kid; to the parking lot of the grocery store to do curbside pickup; to an out-of-town friends empty house to do work; and to the front porch to garden while my kid runs through the sprinkler. I still overpack, but I can standardize my carry list for each of these outings, and I have, making a list for each location and posting it on the side of the fridge. If something goes in my creek pack (kids book to read, sunscreen, bug spray), its meant to be there. Goodbye, random crap in my bag. My shoulder muscles sure dont miss you. Staff writer Rebecca Onion

For a parent of twin fifth-grade boys, the ritual of sitting down with teachers for 10 minutes once a quarter is a hassle. I have to take off work, if the conference is during the day, or find child care, if its at night. Then I have to drive across town, trying to remember all the little issues Id wanted to discuss from previous weeks that I forgot to jot down. During the conference itself, I have to sit in a too-small chair, for a too-short conversation. And did I mention I have twins? I have to do this twice. Its not that I dont want to talk to their teachers. But distance learningwhich is, on balance, terriblehas revealed theres a better way. While trying to help teach the boys at home last spring, I felt more encouraged to reach out to teachers than I ever have in the past. I sent notes of thanks, notes with questions, and notes of total confusion. I received similar notes in response. Together, we hatched plans of attack on how to handle a delicate situation or just how to get all the things done. Many times during each week, I saw the faces of the teachers in my own home. Sure, they were inside the laptop on the counter, talking to their students, but it felt like they were sitting with me in my own kitchen. I didnt even notice that we did not have an official parent-teacher conference last spring. Now that the boys are back to school in person, I would love to keep up a routine of more frequent, spontaneous contact. That might be too much work for teachers. In which case, I would like the option to do parent-teacher conferences over Zoom. Designer Holly Allen

I got hooked on foundation when I was a tween, when deep, painful pimples started forming all over my face. In the decade since, foundation has given me comfort and confidence. No, it didnt look completely natural (cake-y, maybe), but it dulled the redness and gave my face a sheen and tone that I came to expect. Id been mulling quitting for a whileone of my best friends did in college, and she looked great. Also, I was tired of spending money on it. When I started working from home in mid-March, I decided to save my liquid foundation for when I might see people in person again. In those first few weeks, each time I looked in the mirrorwhich was a lot, with all the hand-washingI winced. When I got on video chats with friends or co-workers, I found myself resting my hand on my chin to cover my blemishes. But a month or so in, the expectations I had of my reflection shifted. Maybe Ive forgotten what that even-tone sheen looked like. Maybe I am finally less invested in others thinking I have zit-less skin. Im finding there are so many benefits to going bare-faced: Im no longer wiping my glasses every half-hour to remove oily, beige residue. Im not stressing about accidentally staining sweatshirts as I pull them over my head. Im no longer using headspace to calculate when Ill need to reapply. And now that Im not slathering the stuff into my pores, I think I might even be having fewer breakouts. Podcast production assistant Madeline Ducharme

If I never go to another before-times party, Ill be fine. Any sort of party that you can still have during the pandemic is a pretty good party, in my book. Celebrations Ive had during COVID have included sending people fancy cake and cookies in the mail and then texting about it, and sitting in my living room with my boyfriend and roommate watching Netflix, the same way I might any night, except that time I happened to be turning 30.

People in my life who typically throw big parties have been thwarted by the coronavirus, and I love it. For a former co-workers birthday, I walked two miles and sat on his stoop for a predetermined 15-minute time slot reserved just for me. Fifteen minutes might seem short, but its more concentrated attention than one might get from a highly social work acquaintance at their own party. In not-a-pandemic, I would have shown up at a crowded apartment and we would have done a seconds-long performance of mutual excitement to see each other and then I would have spent another hour being a little anxious and a little bored while I talked to strangers and then I would have apologized and spent a bunch of time on the subway. Instead, at this mini stoop party, we talked about how we were actually doing (badlyits a pandemic), I ate a piece of cake, and then the next person showed up, and I was obligated by public health guidelines to leave. Sure, I wish that celebrations werent confined to either my home or online or the outdoors, and so easily ruinable by rain or other bad weather (I wanted to toast to my new age on a roof!). I really, really wish distance did not confine who we get to see in person now that planes pose such a risk (sorry to miss your wedding, Florida cousin). But right now I can conjure maybe four times in my life that I have deeply enjoyed an honest-to-God party, and they have all been followed up by a hangover. Is that sad? No. Because life without parties is better. Staff writer Shannon Palus

When I started working out consistently, I just wanted to lose weight. But once a friend showed me how to use weight machines at the gym, I began working out to build muscle mass and get strongeror at least thats how I framed it to myself. I chased the satisfaction that came with holding a plank a little bit longer, running slightly faster, and building muscles that, yes, made my body leaner. And it was all measurable: Going to the gym six days a week to lift, sprint, or do plyometrics translated to a healthier lifestyle, one I could glimpse through my numbers. After the pandemic hit, not being able to safely go to the gym left me with a startling realization: I was still where I started, engaged in a vanity project. It wasnt about what the scale said anymore; I was genuinely in it to be healthy. But to an extent, chasing those better metrics was also about what I saw when I looked in the mirror. I was still putting my body through hell to be smaller, leaner, and more muscular. This year alone, before isolation began, I worsened a foot injury doing tuck jumps and pulled something in my shoulder trying to stick to an overzealous program.

Instead of pushing myself past the brink with elaborate workouts in my living room, Ive thought about what health really means to me, and why I was exercising the way I did. Since March, I have found peace in a simpler routine using limited space, a set of 15-pound dumbbells, a jump rope, and a mat. I was surprised how much joy I feel while performing basic bodyweight workouts and running outside. Not being sore all the time is another bonus. Im more attuned to my body and what it likes and needs, and no longer feeding a metric-gobbling ego. Ive tossed my measuring tape and my scale for good. Ive spent time reflecting on how I perceive my body in my therapy appointments. Its an ongoing, uncertain process, and I will return to the gym someday. But in the meantime, I feel healthier even though Im spending more time sitting still. Staff writer Julia Craven

I loathe loud, crowded bars, but I love drinking with friends. One of the scant bright spots of these past few months has been ordering a fried chicken sandwich and a cocktail from my favorite neighborhood restaurant for a picnic with my quarantine bubble or a craft brew from a renowned local beer bar to sip while Zooming with family. Im thrilled to support my favorite bars and restaurants so they can survive the pandemic, while imbibing their delicious concoctions wherever I please. Alcohol laws in America are bizarre, from Massachusettss ban on happy hour specials to Utahs limit on cocktail strength. When I moved to D.C. a decade ago, liquor stores were shuttered on Sundays. Here as in many cities and states, the closing of bars and restaurants prompted officials to brush aside restrictions on to-go beer, wine, and cocktails. The ability to sell beer on Seamless, and serve margaritas at takeout windows, has been a lifeline, restaurant owners say. Im not the only one hopeful this will stick around once going out to dinner is no longer a risky activity and restaurants are allowed to seat people to their full capacity. Lawmakers in D.C. and elsewhere have signaled its a possibility. Sure, there are downsides. Its harder to prevent minors from ordering booze via delivery apps. Im not a fan of the waste from the extra packaging (in my experience, mostly nonrecyclable plastic). Plus, most takeout cocktail options come in servings of two or four, yet Im ordering for one. But hey, its a pandemic. Whos really counting? Managing Editor Meg Wiegand

The calendar hanging in our kitchen was a sacred text. Its the way I communicated my travel schedule to my husband and our nanny. As the head of Slate Live, I bounced between the magazines D.C. office (my home base), the NYC office, and venues across America and Canada, all in service of producing 30 or so events each year. Heres a sample four-week period from early 2020: I flew to Utah for the weekend for the Sundance Film Festival. A week later, I went on tour with the Slow Burn team to D.C., New York City, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. At least this didnt involve flying from one coast to the other, then back again the next day, which I do not infrequently. Traveling for fun or to family is great. Traveling for work is rough. I have two small kids at home, so I kept my trips as short and efficient as possible. Even when I would travel to a new city, I spent my time in the airport, the hotel, and the live show venue with no time for sightseeing or adventure. I didnt get to visit the Gateway Arch in St. Louis. In Vancouver, there was no time to spare for a quick hike. During the pandemic, I get to eat meals with my family every day. I sleep in my own bed every night, with my favorite blanket and blackout curtains. No more 14-hour workdays, no more crappy airport food and spotty airplane Wi-Fi. My suitcase and travel chargers are now in the back of my closet. I can oversee live shows with thousands of audience members from my kitchen counter. The calendar with my schedule now sits abandoned on a shelf. Faith Smith, executive producer of Slate Live

Last July, after securing permission from my bosses to work remotely for two years, I packed up my New York City apartment and moved to Charlottesville, Virginia. I moved because my boyfriend is in law school here, and I wanted to be with him. I did not move because I particularly wanted to leave New York, though I tried to frame it to myself as a good opportunity to see what not living in New York might be like. But when I got here, I didnt really give the test run a shot. I figured out a system to mostly avoid working from home: take the train two-and-a-half hours to D.C. Tuesday morning, work from Slates D.C. office through Thursday and stay with my sister, then train home on Thursday night. I made sure to go back to New York at least once a quarter, plus I scheduled trips to visit my friends in other places, because, well, when you live in a town where you have no particular attachments, its the perfect time to do that. I didnt make too much of an effort to become a resident of Charlottesville. And then the pandemic hit, and we were all stuck in place.

I told myself that my life here was exactly the same as it would have been anywhere else, but better (yard!). I still didnt like working from home, but it was easier when everyone else was doing the same thing. I could hang out with my friends in New York the same amount that they were hanging out with one anothersuddenly everything was virtual so where I was didnt matter. I could even go to yoga at my Brooklyn studio, with the instructor I loved. I continued to focus on replicating the life I had had in New York, as I had already been doing during the time I lived in Charlottesville. The coronavirus made it easier for me to do this. But its not pleasant to live in one place while pretending in your heart that you still live in another. Its not healthy to think about time as a countdown to something else, and its not normal for most social events to happen through a screen. So Ive decided that its time to finally live where I live, even though its a bizarre moment to figure out how to make a new place home. For me, lately, this has meant biking around the absurd number of horse farms here, buying a National Parks pass, and becoming attached to a specific peach orchard. For the next few months, at least, Im going to try letting go of my longing in order to just be here. News director Susan Matthews

Excerpt from:
Good riddance to hugs, purse crap, and the other things we won't miss when all this is over. - Slate

As the Labor Day weekend approaches, infectious disease experts continue to stress the importance of wearing masks and practicing social distancing, or else Alabama could see another spike in COVID-19 cases and deaths.

Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, director of UABs Division of Infectious Diseases, told reporters on Thursday that theres serious concern the state could see another surge in cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the weeks after the Labor Day weekend, as happened after Memorial Day and the Fourth of July.

This is not a time to let up, Marrazzo said.

While the number of new COVID-19 cases across the state have dropped in recent weeks, Alabama still recorded almost 10,000 new cases this week, Marrazzo said.

So I really want to impress upon people that while we have made some strides, with a lot of sacrifice, we are still in a place where we have a lot to do, not only to keep driving things down, but equally importantly, and almost more critically, to prevent that post holiday surge that we can almost predict will happen if people do do what they tend to do on a three day weekend, Marrazzo said.

Marrazzo discussed recent news that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent letters to states urging them to prepare to disburse a COVID-19 vaccine by Nov. 1, two days before Election Day. That letter has prompted concerns from many that a vaccine might be fast tracked well beyond safe measures and for political purposes.

Public Service Announcement

Marrazzo said that earlier in the pandemic infectious disease experts believe the earliest the world could see a safe, effective vaccine was around June 2021. It would take that long to track those enrolled in clinical trials to learn whether the vaccine works and is safe to administer, she said. That thinking changed as the drug company Modernas vaccine continued through clinical trials, and it became a possibility, if all went well, that a vaccine could be ready for market in February, she said.

Now, Marrazzo said medical experts are hearing a vaccines readiness could hinge on data coming from European studies of a couple of vaccines, that are showing evidence of the ability to produce antibodies. She cautioned, however, that theres been no evidence of whether any vaccine can actually reduce new cases, or whether theyre safe enough to inject the public with.

First of all, we dont know enough yet about what real immunity, long lasting, robust immunity to the coronavirus is, Marrazzo said, adding that reinfection has been shown to happen and we dont yet know all we need to about those reinfections.

The second is, we have never used a messenger RNA vaccine in a human population before, before these trials, Marrazzo said. This is totally new technology. we think its safe, but we dont know. its not a tried-and-true method, and so that for me really increases the bar for safety, a lot.

Researchers like to follow enrollees in phase three clinical trials for vaccines for at least year, to look for side effects and rare events, she said, noting the 1976 swine flu outbreak among soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey, which prompted President Gerald Ford to rush through a vaccine that had not been widely studied.

Cases of the Guillain-Barr syndrome in those vaccinated with the rushed vaccine began showing up in numerous states and several people died, according to news accounts. Ford agreed to suspend vaccinations using the drug.

Its a real cautionary tale, and who knows what the calculus was at that time, I mean it was a valid concern, but there were many people who thought that was ill advised and it was rushed, Marrazzo said.

Maybe they know something I dont know, its always possible, Marrazzo said of the CDC. But do we really have confidence that we can go out there and vaccinate everybody safely without knowing the longer term benefits are side effects of this vaccine? Thats my really big concern.

Asked by a reporter if she would take a vaccine herself, if it was offered before the effects and benefits were fully studied, Marrazzo said that at this very moment I would say that I would probably not get it.

Marrazzo said some might weight the benefits of such a vaccine against continue to practice social distancing and wearing masks and decide to take that risk, but she would like to see a full-throated endorsement of the vaccine by the American College of Immunization Practices and more data on the drug before considering it for herself.

Asked what she would tell Gov. Kay Ivey about disbursing a vaccine as early as the CDC has asked states to ready to do so, Marrazzo said we need ironclad proof that a vaccine is safe and effective.

We are not there right now. There is no way that I have seen myself, and I know that most experts have seen enough data, to feel like, not only today theres something to roll out, but in seven short weeks, Marrazzo said.

Marrazzo said thats not to say there isnt an urgency to get a vaccine to market, but we shouldnt rush to get a product before we know its safe.

And we deserve the best. We deserve better. I mean, people have been through hell with this thing, Marrazzo said.

See the rest here:
Unemployment in Alabama's Black Belt outpaces rest of state both before and after COVID - alreporter.com

People dont really like eating raisins because of their unusual taste. But what they dont know is the role of raisins for weight loss. Just ignore the wrinkly shrunken appearance of raisins and focus on the benefits associated with them. Not just weight loss, there are many amazing things that make raisins a healthier version of sugar.

There is a high amount of fiber in raisins which has hidden benefits for people on a weight-loss track. But it doesnt mean that you can consume it in abundance. No matter how much amount of raisins you are taking, exercise, or any other form of moderate physical activity is essential to metabolize it.

Also read- Can You Get Over a Painful Trauma through Food?

Raisins dont play a direct role in weight loss. but there are so many ways that it can affect the quality and efficiency of the weight loss process. It helps a person to overcome sugar cravings, stay energetic, and fit throughout this weight loss duration. Here are four ways that underline the significance of eating raisins for weight loss.

Raisins are natural sugar and eating them provides a substantial amount of energy to the body. Normally when a person is following a low-calorie diet, he feels lethargic and tired all the time. Unless he is on a healthy weight loss plan and taking nutrient-rich foods like raisins.

The glucose and fructose inside raisins burn and provide fuel to the body to proceed with all its functions. This way the boy doesnt compromise on the energy despite losing weight.

The most desirable type of weight loss is by boosting digestion and allowing the body to burn all calories that it has consumed in the form of food. Usually, people with low metabolic rates often experience difficulties in weight loss and they are searching for something which could speed up metabolism.

Surprisingly, they dont really need a supplement or medicine to boost metabolism when there are natural products like raisins to do the same. Adding a small number of raisins in any meal of the day or used as a snack in between meals helps the body to improve digestion and burn fats fast.

This improved digestion also means that there are least chances of gaining all the lost weight back because the body is constantly burning the calories.

The overweight and obese person often fall a victim to weak bones and bone-related diseases. The extra weight on the body is difficult to be carried by the bones. Gradually, the bones become weak and experience low bone density, curving of bones, or porous bones. It implies that no one should ignore bone health while following a weight loss diet plan.

Also read- Why the 2020 US Presidential Elections Are More Stressful than Before

The best is to consume foods that naturally improve bone health. For example, raisins have a high amount of nutrients all of which are required by a good bone density. Regularly taking raisins for weight loss also ensures that the bones are not suffering.

Typically, a person with ideal body weight is healthy. But the choice of foods determines the quality of his health and immune response in case of a threat for example the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

Raisins have hidden benefits for heart, kidney, blood sugar, blood pressure, and whatnot. Adding raisins in routine improves the overall quality of life, maintains the bodys pH, and prevents diseases.

See the original post here:
4 Reasons to Try Raisins for Weight Loss - TheHealthMania

3 Metabolism Myths Ruining Your Weight Loss Goals

Click to expand

UP NEXT

You may eat with your eyes first, but both your stomach and your mind have a big say in how much you consume before you feel full. A July 2020 study in the journal Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology suggests that while your stomach volume can lead you to eat more calories at a meal, your brain can override your physical limits if you're not careful.

The researchers recruited 62 obese people who were otherwise healthy. (Fifty-seven were women.) The researchers determined obesity as having a body mass index (BMI is a combined measurement of your height and weight)of over 30; that's the same as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's BMI scale. The participants didn't have eating disorders, alcohol problems, or mood disorders like anxiety or depression.

First, participants drank a nutritional supplement called Ensure so researchers could measure the amount of food volume it took each person to feel full. They rated their fullness levels every five minutes, and when they hit "maximum or unbearable," they stopped drinking.

Now the researchers knew roughly the stomach volume for each participant. Four hours later, the volunteers were offered a buffet of vegetable lasagna, vanilla pudding, and skim milk, and they had 30 minutes to eat as much as they wanted. The scientists kept track of the amount each person ate.

People with larger stomachs could consume up to 30 percent more calories, explains Michael Camilleri, MD, study co-author and consultant in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in the Department of Internal Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. He notes that on average, stomachs enlarged to about three times their fasting size after a meal. Unfortunately, the link between feeling full on the nutritional drink didn't line up with feeling full at the buffet; the results showed the volunteers could push past their stomach volume when eating real food.

Anyone who has sat down to a Thanksgiving spread knows this to be true: Eagerness to eat can lead you to overdo itand your stomach size won't necessarily slow you down. There's another factor at work, says Dr. Camilleri: A process called gastric emptying rate, which is how fast food leaves the stomach. "It's estimated that about one in every four people with obesity has fast gastric emptying," says Dr. Camilleri. In short, the stomach empties food rapidly and then sends a signal that you're hungry again.

For the study, Dr. Camilleri also tracked gastric emptying and, sure enough, a quick exit could also lead to higher consumption. The volume of your stomach as well as how fast it empties "both impact the amount people eat to feel comfortable or not to feel hungry," explains Dr. Camilleri.

There still exists the "perception that non-fat calories [like from carbohydrates] don't cause overall weight gain," says Dr. Camilleri. But in the study, eating more carbs typically went hand in hand with having a bigger meal. Eating more fat and protein didn't have that connection.

The biggest lesson is that the size of your stomach and your desires combine to trigger overeating. You can combat this by imposing limits on yourself. For example, when you're faced with a buffet, fill a plate with some prime choicesbut don't let yourself go back for seconds. Another option is to remove temptation altogether by not bringing dishes to the table: Instead, serve yourself up in the kitchen, eat at the dinner table, and only return to the kitchen to clean up and stash the leftovers.

In addition to gaining a better understanding of how the body processes fullness, says Dr. Camilleri, his research may also lead to the development of a weight-loss treatment that limits stomach volume or slows gastric emptying. There are already some medications that do this. One, like Liraglutide, slows the rate at which food leaves the stomach, he says. That can help people feel fuller, longer. Indeed a 2015 study in JAMA found that people who were overweight and obese with type 2 diabetes who took 3 milligrams of liraglutide daily lost weight over about a year period, compared to a placebo group. One-quarter of those patients lost more than 10 percent of their body weight, compared to less than 7 percent of patients in the placebo group. Next up, Dr. Camilleri plans to pursue the research looking at people in other weight categories.

The post Heres What Buffets Do to Your Body and Brain appeared first on The Healthy.

Gallery: 10 Reasons You're Constantly Bloated, According to a Dietitian (Eat This, Not That!)

More:
Here's What Buffets Do to Your Body and Brain - MSN Money