Category Archives: Lose Weight Fast

Papaya can be hailed as one of the healthiest fruits, which you can eat on a daily basis. Read here to know how it can benefit diabetics and people with heart disease.

Papaya is an incredibly nutritious food that is low in calories and high in fibre

Papaya is one of the healthiest fruits in existence. Including it in your diet can provide you with the health benefits like reduced risk of obesity, diabetes and heart disease. What's more, you can include it in your diet if you are trying to lose weight. The fruit is versatile in nature. It can be combined with other foods, which can help in enhancing its flavour. Papaya can be eaten for breakfast along with some yogurt. One can also blend it into a smoothie along with other fruits. The fruit can be consumed as an appetiser as well as dessert.

One small papaya (around 150 gms) is said to have around 3 gms of fibre, 15 gms of carbs, 1 gm of protein, 157 % of recommended daily intake (RDI) of Vitamin C, 33% of RDI of Vitamin A, 14% of RDI of Vitamin B9 or folate and 11% of RDI or potassium.

Also read:These 5 Fibre-Rich Low-Calorie Fruits Will Help You Maintain A Healthy Weight

1. Weight loss: Being high in fibre and water content, papaya can aid weight loss. The fruit is also low in calories, which makes it ideal for weight watchers.

2. Improved digestion: Fibre and water content in papayas can also be beneficial for preventing constipation and keeping the digestive tract health. Papain, a digestive enzyme in papaya further helps in improving digestion.

3. Type 2 diabetes: Studies have found that people with type 2 diabetes can benefit by consuming a diet in fibre. It can improve levels of blood glucose, lipid and insulin. Papaya is also full of antioxidants that can reduce oxidative stress in older adults and people with prediabetes.

Papaya can improve blood glucose and insulin levelsPhoto Credit: iStock

Also read:5 Diabetes-Friendly Snacks That Can Help You Beat Hunger Pangs

4. May improve heart health: Antioxidants in papaya can protect your heart and enhance protective effects of good HDL cholesterol. Adding more papaya can improve your heart health.

5. Eye health: Zeaxanthin is an antioxidant in papaya, which can filter out harmful blue light-rays to protect eye health and reduce the risk and progression of age-related macular degeneration.

6. Protects against skin damage: Vitamin C and lycopene have skin protecting and anti-ageing properties. The fruit can reduce the damage caused by free radicals, thus reducing wrinkling, sagging and other skin damage.

The bottom line is that papaya is an incredibly nutritious fruit which can benefit your health in a number of ways. Include it in your daily diet to reduce age-related effects on health and better heart health.

Promoted

Also read:This Monsoon Fruit Can Help Boost Digestion, Heart Health And Much More: Here's How

Disclaimer: This content including advice provides generic information only. It is in no way a substitute for qualified medical opinion. Always consult a specialist or your own doctor for more information. NDTV does not claim responsibility for this information.

DoctorNDTV is the one stop site for all your health needs providing the most credible health information, health news and tips with expert advice on healthy living, diet plans, informative videos etc. You can get the most relevant and accurate info you need about health problems like diabetes, cancer, pregnancy, HIV and AIDS, weight loss and many other lifestyle diseases. We have a panel of over 350 experts who help us develop content by giving their valuable inputs and bringing to us the latest in the world of healthcare.

Here is the original post:
Weight Loss, Digestion, Diabetes Other Incredible Health Benefits Of Including Papaya In Your Daily Diet - NDTV Doctor

SAN DIEGO, Aug. 13, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Obalon Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: OBLN), a weight loss solutions company with the first and only FDA-approved swallowable, gas-filled intragastric balloon system for the treatment of obesity,today announced that it has executed a consulting agreement with Blue Ox Healthcare Partners, LLC, a private equity firm focused on commercial-ready companies bringing technology enabled innovation to healthcare, especially those involved in precision health, healthcare delivery, and affordability.

The agreement calls for Blue Ox to provide consulting services to Obalon, including helping Obalon to develop and implement an effective coverage and reimbursement-based go-to-market strategy. Activities will include an evaluation of the current clinical evidence of the Obalon Balloon System, consideration of health economic studies to define cost of care reductions for patients with diabetes and hypertension resulting from its use, and assessments and readying of strategies for successful commercialization with managed care companies and risk-based providers.

Charles Kennedy, MD, Managing Partner and CEO of Blue Ox, commented, The clinical literature shows that weight loss can result in diabetes remission in correctly selected patient populations. The Obalon weight loss solution has completed sufficient clinical trials to prove safety and effectiveness. We are excited to work with Obalon to help combat obesity and diabetes and show health plans and value-based providers the patient outcomes and economic gains that can result.

Obalon continued to reiterate that obtaining reimbursement is never certain and can take many years to achieve, and if achieved, may not be determinative of the Companys success. If initial efforts with payers begin to bear success, Obalon would expect to need to raise additional capital to support those efforts.

About Obalon Therapeutics, Inc.

Obalon Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: OBLN) is a San Diego-based company focused on developing and commercializing novel technologies for weight loss. For more information, please visithttp://www.obalon.com.

About Blue Ox Healthcare Partners, LLC

Blue Ox Healthcare Partners, LLC is a private equity firm focused on commercial-ready companies bringing technology enabled innovation to healthcare, especially those involved in precision health, healthcare delivery, and affordability. For more information, please visit http://www.blueoxhcp.com.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements that are not purely historical regarding Obalons or its managements intentions, beliefs, expectations and strategies for the future, including those related to new products and their potential benefits. All forward-looking statements and reasons why results might differ included in this press release are made as of the date of this release, based on information currently available to Obalon, deal with future events, are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in those forward looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from Obalons current expectations are more fully described in Obalons annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019, periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2020 and its other reports, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, Obalon assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement after the date of this report or to conform these forward-looking statements to actual results.

Read the original here:
Obalon Announces Consulting Agreement As Part of Strategy To Seek Coverage and Reimbursement for The Obalon Balloon System - GlobeNewswire

Hollywood royalty! Kelly Osbourne has been in the public eye her entire life and as a result, fans have been able to watch her transform before their very eyes. Of course, the Papa Dont Preach singer looks much different in 2020 than she did while starring on her famous familys reality TV series, The Osbournes, in the early 2000s.

In fact, the daughter of Sharon and Ozzy Osbourne revealed a dramatic 85-pound weight loss in August 2020. Yes, Im bragging because I worked hard and it feels good!! Kelly captioned a photo of her size 26 jeans while shopping at Neiman Marcus on August 8.

Prior to that, on August 3, the U.K. native uploaded a stunning selfie to Instagram with the caption: Today Im feeling #Gucci. Of course, Kellys followers couldnt help but hype her up including The Real cohost JeannieMais mother, Olivia TuTram Mai.

Oh my gosh, you lost a lot of weight, Olivia commented, along with a kissy face emoji. Thats right, Mamma Mai. I lost 85 pounds since I last saw you. Can you believe it? the former Fashion Police host replied.

Kelly feels like a new person today, a source exclusively told Life & Style. After years of fad eating plans and yo-yo dieting, she has finally realized what works for her. Shes embraced her vegan diet and she incorporates weights into her exercise routine, which includes a lot of walking.

As a result of growing up in the spotlight, Kelly is no stranger to scrutiny. However, over the years, shes learned to embrace the skin shes in. Kelly doesnt obsess about her body anymore, the insider added. Once she stopped beating herself up and concentrated on healthier choices, the pounds just started coming off.

Kellys health and fitness journey began after she appeared on Dancing With the Stars in 2009 and clearly, shes come so far. I never thought in a million years, Id be that healthy girl who wakes up every morning to exercise, Kelly previously told Shape magazine. After being called cherubic and chubby, Im rocking a bikini!

To see Kelly Osbournes total transformation, scroll through the gallery below!

Read more from the original source:
Kelly Osbourne's Weight Loss Transformation: Photos of Her Then vs. Now - Life&Style Weekly

Gregg Wallace has said he was absolutely horrified at his appearance when first watching old episodes of MasterChef that were filmed before his dramatic weight loss, but that changed into immense pride at his achievement.

The TV star, 55, shed four stone through healthy eating and exercise and criticised ridiculous diets for deceiving people into thinking there are shortcuts to losing weight.

He is supporting the Better Health campaign launched by Public Health England, which offers free tools and apps to help people eat better, get fit and lose weight, as evidence indicates being obese or excessively overweight puts people at greater risk of serious illness or death from Covid-19.

He told the PA news agency: Im really anti-diets, Ive never been on a diet in my life.

I really dont want anybody to ever be hungry, I think thats a terrible thing, or uncomfortable, or set themselves unrealistic fitness goals. Its a routine, getting into a routine of living healthier.

The issues I faced when I was trying to lose weight is we just dont have the right information. People that were overweight as I was, we werent greedy, were not stupid, we just didnt know.

And we wrongly, or I did, thought that in order to lose weight we had to diet which meant you had to be hungry. No, you dont, you really, really dont.

https://twitter.com/GreggAWallace/status/1292443735494725633/photo/1

He continued: Telling people they have to stay on the straight and narrow is just going to frighten people off from attempting it.

But its how we perceive healthiness, how we perceive healthy eating, this is why I do urge people towards this NHS Better Health, because its full of the advice Ive just been giving, its a friendly helping hand in the right direction.

Its not lecturing and telling you that you have to live on lettuce leaves and you cant drink alcohol cos its unrealistic, these are why diets are unrealistic.

What is this one where you have to starve yourself three times a week, or youre only allowed to eat between 3 and 4 in the afternoon, what is that all about? That is just crazy. No-one is going to maintain that, are they?

Those diets, there is a saying and it rhymes with duck fat. Its just ridiculous.

I think why it is, is people are looking for a quick way of doing something, or a way that they can still have their pizzas, their curries, their beer, their wine and somehow they will still lose weight.

They are lying to you! What do you do when you stop? What then happens? And why would you want to have discomfort in your life?

He continued: It doesnt have to be like that. Im not lying when I said I lost four stone. At the moment we are showing clips of all the old MasterChefs going back 15 years, its called A Recipe For Success, you can clearly see I used to be a fat bloke so Im not lying.

I didnt take a magic pill and I was not abducted by aliens. I ate out, I went to rugby matches and drank beer, I had the odd takeaway and I stopped at the odd fast food restaurant. Thats alright, as long as youre not living on it.

Reflecting on seeing his previous appearance on screen, he said: First of all I looked at it and I was horrified, absolutely horrified and then I was struck with an immense sense of pride and wellbeing.

I did it, its great. I dont need to lose any more weight now, I just need to maintain. But I know what it is, its about teaching yourself over time, healthy habits that become part of your everyday life.

Asked if he thought the Better Health campaign was at odds with the Governments Eat Out To Help out campaign urging people to return to restaurants, he said: I cook a lot and I eat out, I dont mind people eating out if they know how to cook.

I dont want them eating out because they dont know how to cook. And there is a massive difference.

Eating out is fun, I love eating out, as soon as Le Gavroche opened I was there with Michel Roux, drinking white burgundy and eating a terrine, and Im a good cook.

By all means, if you know how to cook, you go out, everyone needs to go out, what I dont want people doing is eating out because they dont know how to cook.

Gregg Wallace is supporting Public Health Englands Better Health campaign. Visitnhs.uk/BetterHealth for free tools and support.

Read the original here:
Gregg Wallace: Horror at pre-weight loss MasterChef look turned to pride - This is The West Country

Paying closer attention to your diet is a necessary component of weight loss, but its not just the meals themselves you have to focus on. You should also be paying careful attention to any toppings you use-especially ones that you turn to regularly.

Unfortunately, many toppings can seriously effect the healthiness of a mealadding calories, fat, sodium, and even sugar if you are not careful. With that in mind, keep reading for the one topping you should never use if you want a flat stomach!

The Biggest Sale In Fashion Is Going Down Right Now!

Shutterstock

Mayonnaise is made from a combination of oil,egg yolks,lemon juiceorvinegar, and seasonings. Although this combination might add some flavor to your favorite dishes, it can also add a lot of calories, fat, and sodium.

Food Network explains, "One cup contains 1440 calories, 160 grams fat, and 24 grams saturated fat. It is an excellent source of vitamins E and K, but it also contains almost 50 percent of your daily recommended amount of sodium."

Shutterstock

Since most people are not eating a full cup of mayonnaise at a time, it's a good idea to consider what a small portion size might mean for your diet and your odds of achieving a flat stomach.

According to Very Well Fit, "Mayonnaise is mostly oil, so it is a high-fat and calorie-dense condiment with 100 calories per tablespoon."

Shutterstock

Although that might seem manageable, it adds up quickly.

Livestrongexplains,"Regular mayonnaise also has 11 grams of fat and and 80 milligrams of sodium in 1 tablespoon. In practical terms, this means 2 tablespoons of mayo on your turkey sandwich can double the fat and calorie content of your lunch."

Shutterstock

Plus, mayo lacks other basic nutrients. Besides fat (albeit the good, healthy kind) and sodium, mayonnaise lacks essential nutrients. Delish explains that although the average mayonnaise contains approximately 40% of your Omega 3-ALAs, it lacks fiber and protein.

With that in mind, if you are hoping to incorporate more filling, whole foods into your diet, skipping mayonnaise is probably for the best.

See the article here:
The One Topping You Should NEVER Use If You Want A Flat Stomach - SheFinds

In the March 1912 issue of Popular Mechanics, during the height of airship "balloonacy," one of the world's first aeronautical engineers Victor Lougheed wrote an article arguing that lighter-than-air ships are inferior to the new but rapidly evolving aeroplane. He proved to be right, and his own brothersAllan and Malcolm Lougheedwould go on to found the Lockheed Corporation. Now a part of Lockheed-Martin, the company now manufactures the most advanced aircraft in the world.

The lightest practical aeroplane capable of carrying a man weighs, with operator and enough fuel for flights of reasonable duration, about 1,000 lb. Such aircraft are sustainedas are the birdsby the complex but highly effective dynamic reactions of the air streams flowing under their wings.

The volume of 1,000 lb. of air is about 15,000 cu. ft.the approximate contents of a sphere 30 ft. in diameter. By substituting for this volume of air something weighing less than 1,000 lb., the something weighing less will float statically in the air, just as anything weighing less than water, volume for volume, will float in water,

As a successful flying vehicle, the aeroplane is a development of no more than a very few years. Yet consistently since its advent it has evolved faster than any other device in the history of transportation. Its genuinely utilitarian applications are already considerable. Its applications to warfare are even now a proved success.

Yet the problem of the aeroplane is inherently complex.

The laws governing its action are exceedingly obscure. The limits of its efficiency are still unknown. Its best form is still undetermined. The difficulties of its equilibrium will still take much solving. And at every turn the aeroplane offers a field for investigation that seems as unlimited as it has proved fertile. While its structures are simple and cheap to build, their design is so baffling and involved, so demanding of the finest abilities of the best engineers, as to rank the problem of dynamic flight as one of the most difficult that modern science has to face.

The balloon as a means of travel is still of negligible utility, despite the numerous and long-continued efforts to make use of it in many fields. Without counterpart in nature, it has proved without justification in fact.

Yet the problem of the balloon is inherently simple.

The laws of its action are obvious. The limit of its lifting capacity is the easily ascertained weight of the air. The problems of its propulsion, steering, and navigation are inescapably definite. Yet, in the 50 years the dirigible has existed, it has not undergone a single fundamental change or improvement. Its changes have been changes in detail. Its improvements have been improvements in degree. Although tremendously expensive to build, and almost impossible to keep built, the problems of floating a balloon structure in the air are so inherently simple as to be easily understood by, and thus appeal to the veriest tyros in mechanical science.

Popular Mechanics

Automobile and aviation motor developments have advanced the speed of the dirigible from 7 to a present maximum of some 30 miles an hournowhere enough to make headway against an ordinary adverse wind. Improved fabrics have enabled the dirigible to stay in the air the present maximum of 36 hours, without descending for gas. Similar slight improvements are the most that even its advocates are able to prophesy for the dirigible.

Yet on this much-punctured bubble of fabric-enveloped gas, it is conservatively estimated that there has been expended within the past 60 years most of this within the latter decade of this periodnot less than $50,000,000.

Never elsewhere in engineering history has so great an expenditure been made in a quest for practical results that were in no measure realized. The pyramids may have cost the world more than the balloon, but a definitely practical result was not their object.

Canals have been tremendous consumers of human labor, but canals serve their purpose. Immense sums have been spent in useless and unsuccessful invention, but it requires whole groups rather than single types of worthless devices to total such expenditures as the balloon has achieved.

Airships: A Century Later

Naval and military devicesbattleships, weapons, armor, equipment, etc.are tremendously costly, but these serve the utilities they are designed to serve, however much these types of utilities may be disparaged by peace advocates.

Experiments with dirigible balloons within comparatively recent years have cost, in Germany, $6,300,000; in England, over $2,000,000; in the United States, $4,000,000; in France, $5,000,000; and in other countries of Europe and in Japan not less than $5,000,000 more.

These figures do not include the costly and long-continued experimentation during an earlier period of development, nor do they include the expenditures in non-dirigible ballooning, which has been made a costly hobby to which American and foreign millionaire sportsmen are even yet much addictedapparently under the impression that they are furthering aeronautical research.

The problem of aerial navigation is fundamentally, as the term implies, a problem of navigation of controlled and directed movement from place to place. Only in an incidental way is it a problem of sustention, and to solve the problem of sustention, difficult though it has proved, is not of itself a solution of the problem of navigating definite courses against adverse winds, at sufficient speeds to admit of practical and reasonably dependable travel.

Popular Mechanics

Indeed, by no method of sound reasoning can the term flight be held to apply to mere uncontrolled sustention in and movement through the aira feat that is variously accomplished by projectiles, skyrockets, objects adjacent to exploded dynamite, etc.

Condemned by this analogy, the various phenomena of balloon ascension, drifting, and dirigibilityhowever interesting they may beare by no proper process of logic entitled even to classification with the phenomena of true flight-such as the controlled flight of birds and aeroplanes, faster than the average movement of the earth's atmosphere in the form of winds, such speed and control being absolutely essential prerequisites to any real navigation of the air.

Thus the balloon is an evasion rather than a solution of the real problems of aerial navigation. It floats in the air rather than navigates it, much as a soap bubble may float for a time, and, in reality, is no more a flying machine than a cork in the sea is an ocean liner.

As one authority, writing in a well-known flight magazine, said recently, "We have been experimenting with dirigibles for years, and ... the sum total of success achieved is not a tithe of that attained in the case of the heavier-than-air type in as many months. Another European expert says that Germany "has to thank her dirigibles for her backward position in aviation, but...she has freely and frankly confessed her mistake in pinning her faith to the illusive gas bag.

Popular Mechanics

The fact that numerous flights, so called, have been made with dirigible balloons, and that many of these flights have been widely heralded as being practical instead of merely spectacular, is completely discounted by the further fact that the successes have been, without exception, achieved in almost perfectly calm weather. In all other cases, the result has been complete failure to travel in the intended direction.

The circuitous thousand-mile drift of the recent "transatlantic" Wellman dirigible, over the Atlantic Ocean, is a typical case in point, and instead of being in any way to the credit of the dirigible, as a trip of that distance, constitutes as conclusive proof as could be sought of the completeness with which these gas bags are at the mercy of every wind that blows.

In the course of similar "balloonacy," as these perennial trans-oceanic fiascos have been classed, there is a remote possibility that some fortuitous combination of a good gas bag with a bad chance, may at last result in one of these exploits being crowned by a sufficiently long drift in the right directiona contingency, however, rather more likely to be realized with a good motorless spherical balloon, several of which have already drifted across country to distances substantially equal to the narrowest dimension of the Atlantic Ocean. Then the problem of aerial navigation will be solvedin the daily newspapers.

Similarly, in the case of the great dirigibles of Count Zeppelinwhich unquestionably are far in advance of other constructions of the same general character, and thus constitute a fair measure of the maximum practicability of the dirigiblethe much exploited and sensational "passenger-carrying" trips of these great balloons, in Germany, have not only been conducted in calm weather, but in addition to this have been attended by most frequent accidents and disasters in landing.

Fortunately, these have happened to be without loss of life in most cases, but the property loss in the way of destruction to the giant aircraft has been prodigious. One expert has estimated that there is an average of $10,000 of damage done to the Zeppelin balloons in each three out of every five of the landings they make.

Popular Mechanics

The effect of size on balloon design is a subject that has been befuddled with much misunderstanding. The common assertion that doubling the dimensions of a balloon cubes its capacity, while only squaring the areas of the surfaces, is, of course, true. But it does not follow from this that the lifting capacity increases faster than the weight with increase in size, for to maintain a proportionate strength it is necessary to increase the thickness of the surface material and the weight of the internal bracing, with each added increment of size.

Insuperable objections to the balloon are its inescapably enormous volume and its consequent strict limitation in weight of structure. To ascend, a balloon must be lighter than the volume of air it displaces. And, the weight of a given volume of air being fixed, there is no possible discovery or invention that can open a way of escape from this inexorable factor of the problem. The only substances that even approach air in lightness being also gases, the design of no conceivable lighter-than-air machine can escape the necessity for two essential elementsspace occupied by a gas lighter than air, and a stout envelope of heavier-than-air material to contain the gas. To the weight of these primary essentials must be added the further weight of structure necessary to afford passenger or cargo accommodation.

Since a sphere of air 30 ft. in diameter weighs about 1,000 lb., while a similar sphere of hydrogen, the lightest known gas, weighs only 70 lb., it is evident that the unlikely discovery of a gas lighter than hydrogen can be of no great benefit, for even should it become feasible to encase a vacuum of the requisite size, as some enthusiasts have hoped, this could add to the sustention only to the extent of the eliminated 70 lb. of hydrogen. From all of which it follows that the best of balloons must be hopelessly bulky and fearfully flimsy, and of only the very smallest lifting capacities in proportion to their sizes.

The balloon is an evasion rather than a solution of the real problems of aerial navigation...[it] is no more a flying machine than a cork in the sea is an ocean liner.

Provided with motors and propelling means, they not only oppose the resistance of enormous areas to rapid motion, but also prove of such fragility that their structure must inevitably collapse under the heavy stresses, should sufficient power ever become available-as is not unlikelyto drive them greatly faster than their present maximums of 25 or 30 miles an hour.

In this connection, however, another comparison between the balloon and the aeroplane, relating to the matter of power, is most interesting. An average aeroplane, weighing 1,000 lb., will oppose not more than 25 sq. ft. of projected area to its movement through the air. A balloon of similar lifting capacity, if made spherical, will oppose over 700 sq. ft. to movement through the air28 times as much area as the aeroplane of the same weight.

Even by compacting this necessary bulk into the most approved elongated dirigible form, the cross-sectional area cannot be reduced below a minimum that is still at least six or seven times as great as the area of the equivalent aeroplane. And, since it is area opposed to movement through the air that measures the quantity of horsepower required, it follows that to propel a dirigible against the minimum resistances of its cross section, must forever require much greater power than is required for both the sustention and propulsion of an aeroplane of equivalent loading.

Incidentally, it is to be remarked that all changes from a spherical form, as in realizing or approximating the elongated form of the dirigible, involve special means for staying the structure, in addition to which they add greatly to the area of the envelope required for a given volume of gas enclosed. The problem of weight and structural security are thus greatly complicated.

The most elementary type of balloon is the spherical balloon, designed for mere ascension and flotation in the air, with no attempt at navigation in a lateral direction except as such movement may result from wind.

The invention of the spherical balloon, according to some authorities, is properly to be credited to the Chinese, who, according to the writings of a French missionary, sent up a balloon in celebration of the coronation of a Chinese emperor, in 1306 A.D.

The first European appreciation of the principle by which a balloon is made to ascend appears to have been due to a Jesuit, Francis Lana, who in 1670 proposed an airship sustained by four hollow copper balls, each 25 ft. in diameter. In 1776, Dr. Black, of Edinburgh, made a small balloon that proved to be too heavy for sustention by the hydrogen it contained, but a few years later Tiberius Cavallo succeeded in inflating soap bubbles with hydrogen, with the result that they floated upward until they burst.

The balloon that is commonly credited with being the first was invented by Stephen and Joseph Montgolfier, and sent up from Annonay, France, on June 5, 1783. This balloon was of paper, about 30 ft. in diameter, and was inflated with heated air, affording an ascensional force of probably 500 lb.

Soon after, on August 27, 1783, a hydrogen balloon was sent up from Paris. On September 19, 1783, the brothers Montgolfier sent up a balloon to which a small car was attached, in which were placed a sheep, a cock, and a duck, which thus had thrust upon them the distinction of being the first balloonists.

Popular Mechanics

The descent occurred eight minutes after the start, and the sheep and duck were uninjured. The cock had not fared so well and his condition was gravely attributed by the scientists present to the effects of the thin atmosphere of the upper regions. More recent diagnosis, however, has suggested that he was trampled upon by the sheep.

The first ascent of a man-carrying balloon was ventured by Pilatre de Rozier, proved a complete failure, who went up to a very moderate height in a captive balloon, built by the Montgolfiers, on October 15, 1783. Following this, on November 21, 1783, de Rozier and the Marquis d'Arlandes made the first free-balloon ascension, from Paris, accomplishing a safe descent in a field 5 miles away after about 20 minutes of drifting, at a height of 500 ft.

Since the foregoing, thousands of other balloon ascensions have been made all the world over. In the course of these, some utility has developed in the way of military and meteorological observations, but the early and unavailing attempts to navigate definite courses from one point to another, either in calm weather or independent of the direction of the wind, have not been materially improved upon by the most recent efforts, aided by every resource of modern engineering. Indeed, as one wag has put it, the sole result has been the division of balloons into two classes, "non-dirigibles and neardirigibles."

When it comes to real navigation of the air...nature's model, the bird, is proved by every test of logic and experience to be the only safe pattern for man to follow.

The first obvious line of improvement in the quest for dirigibility was the reduction of the head resistances, as has been already explained. This is the ideal held in view in the many cylindrical, cigar-shaped, and other elongated and pointed gas bags with which the modern student of this subject is familiar.

Dirigible balloons have been developed in three principal typesthe rigid, the semi-rigid, and the non-rigid. Of the first of these, the Zeppelin was the original and still remains the most conspicuous example. In it the whole device is given its form by a maze of internal structure, partitioned into compartments within which the gas is confined in a plurality of small fabric reservoirs.

The semi-rigid type of dirigible, of which the French army has been the chief sponsor, involves a pointed gas bag, not internally braced, and kept in shape by being stayed by netting and numerous ropes to a long truss-like girder beneath it.

The non-rigid balloon is simply a bag kept in shape by its form and the pressure of the gas within it, so it is naturally subject to all sorts of failures to maintain its proper form.

A particular example of the sorry and expensive experiences various governments have had with the dirigible balloon problem is the German government's recent dismissal of the Zeppelin proposition in favor of the aeroplane, for which an army appropriation of some $5,000,000 has been made for the coming year.

Popular Mechanics

Another case is that of the English navy dirigible, aptly dubbed "Mayfly," which recently broke in two and capsized at a total loss of $400,000, the first time it was taken out of the floating shed that housed it.

Further condemnation of the dirigible is found in the fact that most of the ablest engineers who have given attention to its problemsSantos Dumont, Renard, and Ferber, for conspicuous examplesand who have expended vast sums upon its development, with resulting successes that will rank with any, have finally deserted the balloon as hopeless, and turned their attention to the aeroplane.

In the matter of propulsion, experiments commenced with the hand manipulated cars and sails of early investigators and developed down to the engines and propellers of modern dirigibles. So far, however, all successes achieved with dirigible balloons have been more spectacular than practical, and despite the roseate imaginings of popular writers, there is little technical reason for expecting that results of more serious value are in any prospect of attainment,

Even admitting the possibility of an exceedingly limited and precarious utility for the dirigible in warfare, in the opinion of those best qualified to judge, it is most unlikely ever to assume the least importance as a means of travel, and can have no future beyond such as is too often founded upon the activities of ignorant inventors or unscrupulous promoters, or upon the thrills a great dirigible undoubtedly affords as a Gargantuan spectacle.

The cost of gas for each filling of a large balloon is alone enough to place it out of the question for performing commercial travel at reasonable cost. Not less than a thousand dollars worth of hydrogen on the basis of the most economical production possible, is required for each inflation of a Zeppelin balloon, which, though 450 ft. long and nearly 50 ft. in diameter, possesses a reserve carrying capacity of only three or four tons. Moreover, with a century of experimenting, no balloon builder as yet has been able to improve materially upon the first envelopes of varnished silkwhich still remains the most impermeable material and at the present time no dirigible balloon has ever succeeded in staying in the air for more than 36 hours.

The conclusion is inevitable, from any competent and unbiased consideration of both the shortcomings and the merits of the balloon, that it can never really compete with the aeroplane as a practical means of traveling in the air. Mere going up in the air is another matter, but for the uses that can be thus served, the simpler and cheaper spherical balloon would appear to be in every way superior to the expensive and practically no more useful dirigible.

When it comes to real navigation of the air, to fast, certain, and absolutely controlled travel in any desired direction, nature's model, the bird, is proved by every test of logic and experience to be the only safe pattern for man to follow.

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

Read the original post:
The Fallacy of the Dirigible | !912 Review of Dirigibles - Popular Mechanics

Photo credit: Instagram

From Delish

Kelly Osbourne recently revealed she's down 85 pounds.

The reality show star once admitted she eats a plant-based diet.

Kelly has chosen to focus on self-care this year, she wrote in an Instagram post.

Kelly Osbourne is celebrating the results of her year of self-care: The reality star recently shared a selfie showing off her purple hairand her 85-pound weight loss.

Olivia TuTram Mai, a.k.a. TV personality Jeannie Mai's mom, commented under Kelly's post. "Oh my gosh, you lost a lot of weight ," wrote Mai. Replying to her comment, Kelly admitted she's actually down 85 pounds. "@themamamai that's right mamma Mai I lost 85lbs since I last saw you. Can you believe it? Kaakakaka."

Kelly also shared a photo of her holding up a size 26 clothing tag (about a size 2 in U.S. sizes), writing "Yes...I'm bragging because I worked hard and it feels good!!!"

This isn't the first time Kelly's publicly talked about her weight: After appearing on the Dancing With The Stars in 2009, Kelly dropped 40 pounds thanks to a combination of her dance rehearsals and her choice to adopt a plant-based diet. In 2012, she became vegan with help from her boyfriend at the time, who was also a vegan chef, according to the Daily Express.

She also once told Huffpost that her new diet slowly turned into more of a lifestyle change. "Once I learned how to work out right and eat right, its one of those things that you just have to commit to a life change rather than being on a diet. Because a diet doesnt work. You lose weight and you stop it and it will all come back. So you just have to take baby steps, commit to something and stay true to it."

Kelly's new weight loss also comes after she revealed she was going to prioritize self-care, she wrote before the start of the new year. "I have come to the realization that I constantly put the needs of others before my own, she wrote in an Instagram post, also celebrating 2.5 years of sobriety. I allow myself to be put in situations that make me feel uncomfortable for fear of upsetting someone else. Not forgetting the amount of times I co-sign the bulls of others."

You Might Also Like

Continued here:
Kelly Osbourne Just Shared A New Photo Of Her Dramatic 85-Pound Weight Loss - Yahoo Lifestyle

Mel is at The Ideal You Weight Loss Center in West Seneca. She is talking with the owner Donna Herberger about some amazing success stories through the COVID quarantine from mid-March through mid-June. There are people who stuck with the program and have and amazing success in spite of what a lot of people are call the COVID 19 weight gain. Donna says during the twelve weeks we were closed they offered curb-side service. She shows us examples of people who stuck with the program and reached their weight loss goals. She says the structure of their program works and the food is delicious. People do even better when they come in for one-on-one counseling and know they have to step on the scale. The combination of all these factors leads to success.

Men typically lose a little more than women per week. They lose about 3-5 pounds per week and women lose about 2-4 pounds per week. Donna says they have helped 6,000 Western New Yorkers lose over 260,000 pounds.

The Ideal You Weight Loss Center has locations in Clarence, West Seneca and Tonawanda.

The Ideal You Weight Loss Center is a corporate sponsor for the Niagara County SPCA and Diamonds in the Ruff in Erie County. On Saturday, August 29th from 1 -3pm they are having their First Annual Pet Adoption Event. It will take place in the parking lot of their Tonawanda location. You will be able to meet and greet with dogs who are available for adoption.

716-631-THIN

For more information about The Ideal You Weight Loss Center click here.

Here is the original post:
Let The Ideal You Weight Loss Center help you lose weight and feel great - WKBW-TV

Eugenio MarongiuGetty Images

Both bulking up and leaning down are admirable aims in isolation, and were willing to bet that you could do with a bit of both. But in practice, though, that can be a tall order after all, weight loss is achieved by cutting calories, which is the antithesis of getting swole. Fortunately, nutritionists at Skidmore College have discovered a workaround: a way to have your beefcake and eat it.

Their study pitted the standard eating plan of three meals a day (with 15% of your calories coming from protein, 60% from carbs and 25% from fat) against two high-protein diets, in which the protein ratio was doubled.

One group of high-protein dieters consumed their daily calorie intake over three main meals; the other ate six smaller meals.

Both high-protein groups lost more fat than those on the conventional eating plan, but the changes occurred much faster for those who doubled their meal count they were also the only group to gain lean mass over eight weeks.

The scientists attributed these results to a process called thermogenesis: eating little and often increased energy expenditure through digestion. Despite the calorie deficit, the steady supply of amino acids from the protein was also able to stop the subjects gains deflating. (Continued below)

This content is imported from YouTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

SUBSCRIBE

A dose every three hours proved to be optimal for protein synthesis, according to a separate study in Nutrition & Metabolism and so the six, high-protein meals a day were able to efficiently fuel gains in muscle alongside losses in weight.

Hungry for progress? Then chew on this new plan of action.

Sign up to the Men's Health newsletter and kickstart your home body plan. Make positive steps to become healthier and mentally strong with all the best fitness, muscle-building and nutrition advice delivered to your inbox.

SIGN UP

For effective home workouts, uplifting stories, easy recipes and advice you can trust, subscribe to Men's Health UK today

SUBSCRIBE

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

More:
Eat Little and Often: Nutritionists Find Eating More Could Aid Weight-Loss - Men's health UK

Healthline says: As you approach your goal weight and advance through these phases, your daily carb allowance increases, allowing you to incorporate a greater variety of foods.

The Atkins diet can help those wanting to reintroduce small amounts of carbohydrates back into their diet soon after starting it.

You can reintroduce 80-100 grams of carbs per day for ongoing weight maintenance.

The Keto diet involves reducing your total carb intake to less than 50 grams per day for the whole duration of your dieting.

The website says: While keto is a moderate-protein approach, with about 20% of calories coming from protein, the Atkins diet allows for up to 30 percent of calories from protein, depending on the phase.

Overall, Atkins is a less restrictive approach and may be more suitable for those wanting to try a diet first time.

Also you can eat a wider variety of foods such as more fruits and vegetables, which isnt usually allowed on the keto diet due to the amount of hidden carbs in these foods.

However both diets can help with weight loss and burning fat to reduce your overall body weight.

See original here:
Atkins vs Keto: The best diet for weight loss and to burn belly fat - Express