Search Weight Loss Topics:

Page 1,088«..1020..1,0871,0881,0891,090..1,1001,110..»

Why We Make (and Break) New Years Resolutions, and 4 Tips to Help You Achieve Your Goals – Newswise

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:42 pm

MEDIA CONTACT

Available for logged-in reporters only

By Dr. Charles Herrick, Chair of Psychiatry, Nuvance Health

Newswise Summary:

Do you feel excited about making a New Years resolution on January 1 each year, but find yourself losing enthusiasm as the weeks go by only to give up entirely by late February or March? If so, youre not alone.

Research shows that as many as 50 percent of adults in the United States make New Years resolutions, but fewer than 10 percent actually keep them for more than a few months. But why?

Whether your goal is to lose weight, get more exercise, quit smoking, save money, or something else entirely, the truth is that there are some common psychology-based reasons why New Years resolutions fall flat. But before you put your goals on the shelf until next year, heres what you need to know about why we make and break New Years resolutions as well as a tips you can use to give yourself the best chance of making your resolution stick.

Why do people make New Years resolutions?

Its human nature to set goals at the start of something new, making the start of the New Year a popular time to set new goals and expectations for the year ahead.

Why do I break my New Years resolutions?

There are many reasons why people may not keep New Years resolutions, but instances of New Years resolution burnout can be narrowed down to three psychology-related issues: difficulty breaking old habits, focusing on specific outcomes, and problems with purpose.

Difficulty breaking old habits

Meeting new goals usually requires creating new habits and breaking old ones and old habits are hard to break. For example, quitting smoking will require you to eliminate smoking from your daily activities, and losing weight will require you to change your diet and exercise routine.

Our habits are ingrained and embedded in our implicit memory, which is also called our automatic memory or unconscious memory. Implicit memory uses our past experiences to help us remember things without actively thinking about them, making it easy for us to stick to similar routines and challenging for us to make changes.

Habits are also multi-faceted, meaning that many elements reinforce our habits and make them more challenging to break. For example, a smoking habit may be influenced by your lifestyle, the places you go, the people you interact with when you smoke, physical sensations associated with smoking, and other rituals. Your feelings, thoughts, and emotions related to smoking can also contribute to making the habit satisfying even before you actually smoke.

Focusing on specific outcomes

Another reason people have trouble keeping New Years resolutions is that they focus on a specific outcome, such as reaching a certain body weight. Focusing on a specific outcome can be defeating if you dont achieve your goal quickly. In most cases, it takes time to achieve a specific outcome, and many people become frustrated and eventually give up before reaching their goal.

Problems with purpose

If youre like most people, youre busy and you probably dont have a lot of time left over at the end of the day to devote to accomplishing things that arent interesting or important to you. If you dont feel connected to your resolution, it isnt meaningful to you, or you arent motivated to make the changes required to achieve your goals, you will be more likely to give up.

How can I keep my New Years resolution?

Developing a new habit as part of your New Years resolution means that you will need to consciously think about the changes you need to make, at least until the new habit becomes embedded in your implicit memory. The process of developing a new habit uses a lot of declarative, or episodic, memory and working memory and requires a lot more mental effort.

To make it easier to keep your New Years resolution, you need to take a multi-faceted approach. Here are a few tips that may help:

1: Find your purpose, but avoid focusing on a specific outcome

If you want to lose weight, for example, avoid focusing on achieving a specific weight. Instead, ask yourself why you want to lose weight and use that as the basis for your goal. Asking why will help you find your real purpose, which will help to improve your motivation. Setting a goal of achieving better health so you can have more energy for your hobbies, for example, takes the focus off of a specific outcome, such as getting to 150 pounds.

Also, its important to remember that early success will motivate you to do more, and better health and an increase in energy is an outcome you will likely be able to achieve quickly by being more active or eating a healthier diet.

By focusing on being healthier rather than achieving a specific weight, you will also be more likely to maintain your healthy habits. If you set a goal of getting to 150 pounds and achieve it, you may be more likely to eventually fall back into old habits and not sustain long-term weight loss.

2: Break your goal into components, and set realistic and achievable process goals

If your goal is to achieve better health, you need to figure out exactly what you need to change to make it happen. For example, you might identify two components that will help you achieve your goal: more exercise and a healthier diet.

Identifying the components is just the first step. You must also set realistic and achievable process goals for each component that make you feel excited and motivated. The more excited you are about your process goals, the more likely you will be to find the time to focus on achieving them. Some examples of process goals include:

These goals shouldnt require a huge sacrifice, and they shouldnt make you feel deprived. However, they should require some effort you want to feel good when you achieve them, after all.

3: Make a public commitment

Human beings are inherently social, and we want to connect with and feel accepted by others. We also want to avoid experiencing feelings of shame and embarrassment that can sometimes be associated with letting people down.

Making a public commitment to achieving your goal can help you hold yourself accountable and ultimately follow through. Many people find that their desire to avoid letting people down and thereby avoid feelings of shame and embarrassment is a powerful motivator to help them deliver on their commitment.

Examples of making a public commitment include telling family or friends about your goal, signing up for a weight loss program, or joining a fitness program with a group of co-workers.

4: Engage with likeminded people

People tend to be more successful at achieving their goals when they connect with other likeminded people. Also, we tend to model the behavior of the people we like and admire, so its important to surround yourself with people who reinforce habits that will help you achieve your goals.

Finding a group of likeminded people who you admire will help you stay motivated especially during the cold, dark months of January, February, and March, when New Years resolutions often hit the skids. Some people may find success and accountability by being part of a larger group, while others may prefer to pair up or join a smaller group. Whatever size group you choose and whether its in-person or online, engaging with others will keep you connected to your goals and make you more likely to be successful.

The bottom line: Finding your purpose, changing your focus, setting the right goals, making a public commitment, and engaging with likeminded people can help you achieve your New Years resolutions.

Dr. Charles Herrick is a board certified psychiatrist, and the chair of psychiatry at Nuvance Healths Danbury Hospital and Norwalk Hospital.

Here is the original post:
Why We Make (and Break) New Years Resolutions, and 4 Tips to Help You Achieve Your Goals - Newswise

Jennifer Aniston doing five day 800 calories a day fast ahead of reunion with ex Brad Pitt at SAG Awards – The Sun

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:42 pm

JENNIFER Aniston is doing a 'five day fast' ahead of her reunion with her ex Brad Pitt at the SAG Awards.

The 50-year-old actress is nominated for an award and is likely to bump into her ex after they enjoyed a reunion at the Golden Globes.

8

Ahead of the Screen Actors' Guild Awards, Jennifer has been spotted sipping from a bottle of hibiscus tea - which is part of a Hollywood diet plan that sees you consume just 800 calories a day.

The ProLon diet was devised by Dr Valter Longo PhD, an American biogerontologist and is designed to work on the body the same way an intermittent fast would.

Followers of the diet are sent soup packets, nut bars, seaweed crackers, herbal teas and the exact water bottle Jen is holding in these pictures, to kickstart their weight loss.

The plan costs 225 for five days and is designed to shed a few pounds quickly - or just in time for an upcoming awards show.

8

8

Jennifer is nominated for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Drama Series for her role on the The Morning Show while Brad is nominated for Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role for his work in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

Earlier this month, it was revealed that Brad and Jennifer have been "inseparable" for months, with it all coming to a head at the Golden Globes.

On the red carpet, Brad referred to his ex as a "good friend", with fans spotting Jen cheering and beaming when he won the Best Supporting Actor gong.

8

8

8

8

Later, they attended two after parties together, although they left separately, and Jennifer was even spotted wearing a strikingly similar ring to the $500k sparkler Brad proposed to her with in 1999.

The pair were married between 2000 and 2005, suffering a bitter split after Brad fell for Angelina Jolie while they were filming Mr. & Mrs. Smith.

He was with Angelina until 2016, with Jennifer marrying Justin Theroux in 2015 before an amicable break-up two years later.

8

FAMILY CRISIS Love Island Ollie's family home 'under 24-hour guard' after hunting backlash

'He's mad' Love Island fans beg Rochelle Humes to save sis Sophie from 'controlling' Connor

LESSER SPOTTED Pearl's disappearance in Emmerdale explained after fans were left baffled

EXIT TWIST Louise Mitchell's EastEnders exit storyline explained

FINISH HIM OFF Corrie viewers predict Yasmeen will KILL 'gaslighter' Geoff with hoover

jack and the lads Inside Corrie star Jack's 80s-themed party with bad wigs and cheesy disco

Following Brad's split from Ang, he and Jen have slowly grown closer, with Brad splashing out on a secret gift for the beauty's 50th birthday, and the exes spotted hugging and chatting at her celebration last year.

The rumour mill then went into overdrive last month when Brad paid a visit to Jen's home for her Christmas party.

He spent four hours at the star-studded get together and was the second from last person to leave just before 11pm.

Read more here:
Jennifer Aniston doing five day 800 calories a day fast ahead of reunion with ex Brad Pitt at SAG Awards - The Sun

What is resistant starch and why its healthier than simple starch – Business Insider

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:42 pm

captionReplacing simple starches with resistant starches can have positive health effects.sourceMatthew J Thomas/Shutterstock

Experts often recommend cutting down on starchy foods for people who are trying to lose weight or who have diabetes. But recent research has found that not all starch is created equal.

Resistant starch, for example, is a type of starch that breaks down slowly like fiber and can have positive health effects. So if you are looking to lose weight and boost your digestive health, you dont necessarily need to cut carbs altogether. Instead, consider replacing some of the more simple starches with resistant starches in your diet.

All starches are a type of carbohydrate that breaks down into a form of sugar called glucose during digestion.

Now, some starch like the kind in a pile of steaming mashed potatoes breaks down quickly. On the one hand, this gives your body a nice boost in energy, but if glucose is absorbed into your bloodstream too rapidly, too often, then over time it can cause health problems such as obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Thats where resistant starches can help. They get their name from how they resist digestion.

Resistant starch is digested in the same way as other starch, just more slowly, says Joshua Lambert, a food science professor at Penn State University.

Your body digests these starches more slowly because of their molecular structure. Resistant starches exist naturally in foods like grains, beans, and legumes. But they can also form in foods like pasta and potatoes by cooking and then letting them cool.

For example, when you cook a starchy food like pasta, the starch molecules relax and spread further apart, making the food easier to break down and digest, which can cause a spike in blood sugar.

But just as cooking causes the starch molecules to relax, this same process reverses as the food cools, basically snapping back into place like a stretched rubber band thats been released. The starch molecules pack together more densely and become harder to break down, slowing the digestion process and maintaining more stable blood sugar levels.

If you are disappointed by the idea of having to eat cold pasta, there may be an added bonus. According to a small, preliminary experiment by the BBC team who runs Trust Me, Im A Doctor if you reheat your pasta after letting it cool, the starches become even more resistant to digestion. Another 2016 study in the journal Food Chemistry found that chilled potatoes had more resistant starch than reheated potatoes, though both had more than hot potatoes.

There are several different types of resistant starches that can show up in food:

If you are on a diet, replacing simple starches with resistant starches may help you lose weight. The slower digestion process can make you feel more full, which may curb unnecessary snacking. Moreover, when you eat resistant starch, your body wont absorb as many calories as it normally would from starchy food.

Because resistant starch can pass through your entire digestive tract without breaking down, it can reach your large intestine or colon largely intact. When this happens, the starch will ferment instead of being converted to glucose. This fermentation process provides food for the good bacteria in your intestines that help with digestion. This promotes colon health, Lambert says.

In fact, experts are in the early stages of investigating whether resistant starches could play a role in preventing colon cancer.

Though resistant starches offer some health benefits, you dont have to focus on them exclusively. For a healthy person, eating other forms of carbohydrates, such as fruit, can provide a helpful energy boost to the body.

Lambert says that while resistant starch is an important part of the diet, it is not a cure-all. Like anything else, it is important to keep it in the context of a healthy diet. Lots of extra resistant starch isnt going to make up for an unhealthy overall diet.

Original post:
What is resistant starch and why its healthier than simple starch - Business Insider

The British Royal Family Has More To Lose Than Harry And Meghan Do – BuzzFeed News

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:42 pm

Carlo Allegri / Reuters

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, exits a hotel in New York City, Feb. 19, 2019.

It was a declaration of independence that left the royal family reeling. On January 8, Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, posted on Instagram about their plans to relinquish their positions as senior members of the British royal family, split their time between North America and the UK, and establish financial independence. The suddenness of the announcement was surprising it was reportedly released in a rush to beat a potential leak to the press, and seemed to catch Buckingham Palace unprepared but the move itself was not entirely unexpected, particularly to those whove been following the young couples saga in dealing with the (often racist and sexist) media coverage of Meghan.

While Queen Elizabeth has since said in a statement on Monday that shes entirely supportive of Prince Harry and Meghans decision, she also made clear, with unusually personal language, that she would have preferred them to remain full-time working Members of the Royal Family. Their departure is a loss to the Windsor family during a turbulent time (see: Brexit, the scandal of Prince Andrew's friendship with and defense of Jeffrey Epstein, and the Duke of Edinburghs waning health), as well as to the monarchy as an institution. After all, Harry is the second-most popular royal, after the 93-year-old Queen. Meanwhile, as the lone woman of color to ever be a senior royal in modern society, Meghan Markle has become something of a global icon herself.

And yet, while Meghan enjoys worldwide popularity, the British press has been consistently, intensely critical of her. The Megxit narrative has been an occasion to recycle a lot of the same labels and accusations it has already deployed: that she is ungrateful and selfish for breaking up the royal family.

Its worth keeping things in perspective, however. The Sussexes havent renounced the royal family on an ideological level (their website details the couples plans to continue to serve the monarchy and strengthen the Commonwealth). The move to be financially independent from the Sovereign Grant, which opens up the possibility of Harry and Meghan earning incomes in other careers, could raise questions (Might this be an option for more royal family members, particularly those far down the line in succession?). But its unlikely to have immediate, ruinous effects on an institution that has always had a knack for durability. As Peter Morgan, creator of The Crown, once described the British royals: Theyre survival organisms, like a mutating virus.

At this rate, it seems more likely that if anything is to destroy the monarchy, it will be the British royals themselves. It is a tenacious institution. But by not enforcing or understanding the need to protect Meghan from vicious, racist press coverage in a more deliberate way, they are losing her and what she had to offer: a new, modern, more progressive image to associate with the monarchy a brand that is ultimately rooted in appearances.

Meghan reacts during a visit to Canada House in London with thanks for the warm Canadian hospitality and support she had received in Canada recently, Jan. 7.

Meghan Markle has been accused of destroying her husbands life and painted as a palace-wrecker whos putting the future of the monarchy particularly postQueen Elizabeth in peril. (Granted, some of these declarations are made gleefully by anti-monarchists, wanting to burn it all down.) Shes also been called a modern-day Yoko Ono on social media, a comparison that stirs up some interesting connotations.

These tweets have primarily been made in jest, some affectionate and some less so. But other likenings have been less lighthearted, with one tweet claiming that, like Ono, Meghan is trampling on tradition, causing chaos, ruining everything and then runs and hides.

By not enforcing or understanding the need to protect Meghan from vicious, racist press coverage in a more deliberate way, the royal family is losing her and what she had to offer.

Ono is a complicated and certainly not faultless public figure, but the widespread cultural narrative around her as the woman who broke up the Beatles is clearly misguided and misogynist. As a 1994 New York Times interview with Ono established, her public reputation was one of a woman whose greatest achievement, it would seem, came from brainwashing that third husband into marrying her in the first place. He was, in the end, a god. She was, all along, the Devil. And Ono has become the namesake of a tired, untrue trope that suggests women are often a (if not the) problem, seducing and bewitching men into misfortune and bad decisions. The so-called Yoko Effect is a fallacy, not an actual phenomenon.

But there are some notable parallels between Meghan and Ono, as two women who stand accused of breaking up historic and beloved British institutions. Maybe most important to keep in mind is that the distrust and demonization they face is, at least in part, rooted in their race.

Every time we saw her, we shouted awful things, a fervent Beatles fan recalled about Ono in Philip Normans book Shout!: The Beatles in Their Generation. Yellow! Chink! Subtle things like that Once, outside Abbey Road, wed got this bunch of yellow roses to give Yoko. We handed them to her thorns first. Yoko took them and backed all the way down the stairs, thanking us. She hadnt realized they were meant to be an insult. Nor did John. He turned back and said, Well, its about time someone did something decent to her.

Meanwhile, Meghan consistently attracts racist news coverage from the British press, teeming with coded language and dog whistles. Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine claimed the Sussexes engagement photo gave her a niggling worry, while other Daily Mail pieces have mentioned Meghans rich and exotic DNA and (inaccurately) invoked her upbringing in a gang-scarred LA neighborhood.

Even when the tabloids dont use race-baiting language, Meghan is targeted in ways that are disproportionate to the typically harsh, often absurd criticism all royal family members get. While Meghans wedding florals nearly murdered Princess Charlotte, Kate Middletons choice of the same flowers was elegant and understated. When Kate eats an avocado, its a cure for morning sickness, but when Meghan eats one? A source of human rights abuse and environmental devastation, naturally. Time and time again, Meghan has been portrayed in a villainous light.

I think what Meghan Markles experience has shown me is that when you put a woman of color into that space, which has always been abusive, there are particular issues, said British journalist and author Afua Hirsch in a BBC interview on Monday. Shes more vulnerable because shes visibly different. The level of hostility both Ono and Meghan have faced is proof of how significant it is that they are occupying spaces where they are othered, spaces not constructed for them. And yet, when theyve made efforts to change that space, or to find a more protected and sustainable role within it, they get the blame.

Another implication of the Yoko Effect (or rather, Yoko Myth) is that it assigns no power, responsibility, or culpability to a man in such a relationship a fact thats pretty rich considering the level of fame, privilege, and influence held by John Lennon and Prince Harry. Even the term Megxit in itself, while quippy, puts the onus of the duke and duchesss joint decision on Meghan.

Like Lennon who was, to be clear, the sole instigator of the Beatles breakup Prince Harry has been known to be outspoken, a bit stubborn, with a rebellious streak. And based on his past comments, it doesnt seem all that likely he was strong-armed by his wife into defecting from the royal family. Hes spoken of having wanted out before, as well as his desire for a semblance of regular life. My mother took a huge part in showing me an ordinary life, the prince told Newsweek in 2017. I am determined to have a relatively normal life, and if I am lucky enough to have children, they can have one too.

The reason why Harry would want to put more distance between his family and the British press is a no-brainer. Hes always blamed the media for the death of his mother and when the paparazzi began to report on Meghan as they were dating, he was quick to call the press out for hounding her. In an unprecedented statement from Kensington Palace in 2016, he condemned the tabloids coverage as racist and sexist: Prince Harry is worried about Ms. Markles safety and is deeply disappointed that he has not been able to protect her.

The reason why Harry would want to put more distance between his family and the British press is a no-brainer.

"I will always protect my family, and now I have a family to protect, Harry told journalist Tom Bradby when the couple was touring southern Africa in October 2019. Everything that [my mother] went through and what happened to her is incredibly real every single day. And that's not just me being paranoid that's just me not wanting a repeat of the past. And if anybody else knew what I knew be it a father, be it a husband, be it anyone you'd probably be doing exactly what I'm doing as well."

The Sussexes infant son, Archie, is no doubt a key factor in their decision to distance themselves from the monarchy and all the attention that comes with it. If they had hoped that their child would be spared from the realities of being a biracial royal, that hope was quickly quashed; days after Meghan gave birth, a BBC broadcaster likened the couples newborn to a well-dressed chimpanzee. To face racism, even as a child, is to live with a chronic, damaging stressor one that afflicts both the mind and body. If casual, constant racism and the denial of ones humanity is part and parcel of a publicly funded royal life which, based on Meghans experience so far, it seems to be then that royal life itself has become a clear threat to Harrys family.

Queen Elizabeth II sits and laughs with Meghan during a ceremony to open the new Mersey Gateway Bridge in the town of Widnes in Cheshire, England, June 14, 2018.

Since Harry and Meghan announced they were dating, the Queen has made active efforts to ensure that Meghan feels welcome and accepted in the royal family. And in the Windsors defense, its essentially a royal tradition to endure bad press, to keep calm and carry on. Plus, given the overwhelming whiteness of the monarchy, its not surprising they arent cognizant of a crucial factor in being an active ally: stepping up and speaking out (much like Harry has done through his warnings to the press, frank interviews, and pending lawsuits). Its not a matter of coddling, but a gesture of care and consideration. If you want growth and evolution that is, if the monarchy wants to modernize emotional inertia cant be an option.

Its a common phenomenon: Historically white businesses and brands claim they want to diversify, but they fail to do the work to nurture and support newcomers. You cant expect to benefit from the perks, PR, and fanfare of having a biracial princess if she isnt given the space to feel empowered, heard, and accepted. The family spends millions on palace guards and security a means to protect their physical bodies but the notion of humanity doesnt seem to be given the same weight or value. The racism Meghan has experienced is treated as benign, when in reality it chips away and infects, as evidenced by her emotional, viral interview with ITV in October.

And when royals lead pampered, sheltered lives lives that provide little experience in resisting the prejudice baked into British and Western society its not surprising they dont (at least yet) understand this. The same seems true of many others, in the media and beyond. Only the two panelists of color on last Thursdays episode of BBCs Question Time were willing to suggest that Meghans unfair treatment may be tied to the way she looks. (For the record, when the moderator asked whether anyone in the audience thought Harry and Meghan had made a bad decision, not one hand was raised.)

Meanwhile, on BBCs Newsnight that same evening, singer Jamelia who is a black woman shared that she too had been a victim of covert racism living in the UK and it pales in comparison to what Ive seen happen to Meghan Markle Its not just social media; its not. Its mainstream media; its tabloid media. In response, author and historian Robert Lacey (a white man) was skeptical: Id like to see the evidence of that. Piers Morgan is another example of someone who repeatedly squawks at black women for evidence and then balks when its offered.

Harry and Meghans decision to quit senior royal life and spend time outside of the UK is not a symbol of defeat: It is an act of self-respect and self-preservation.

On Monday, Phillip Schofield, co-host of This Morning, also requested examples of racism that Meghan has endured, to which guest Shola Mos-Shogbamimu, a black lawyer and activist, responded: It makes me question where have you been the last two years Let me explain what racism looks like from the lens of white privilege. White privilege whitewashes racist and inflammatory language as unconscious bias. It perpetuates the bigotry of intolerant white people as ignorant. It defends and protects their private views once spoken as misspeak, and then camouflages racist behavior as error of judgment.

The persistent demand for proof of racism during the Megxit news cycle has become at best exhausting and at worst triggering. I dont find it surprising that Meghan herself, who was in Canada as the Sandringham summit occurred, felt it wasnt necessary to be physically present for the talks between Prince Harry, Prince William, Prince Charles, and the Queen. Its tiring to ask that your humanity be acknowledged only for your mistreatment to be downplayed or denied, over and over again.

Its possible that Harry and Meghans decision and the dialogue its creating could help push both the monarchy and British media to evolve into something thats not just more diverse and inclusive, but more self-aware (whether it be in revisiting and reframing old myths or simply setting the tone for the future). Still, its not the responsibility of black people or other minorities to teach Racism 101 to their white peers, not through interviews and certainly not through their lives. Meghan may have married someone whose family comes with a lot of baggage, but she didnt sign up to be a case study.

Harry and Meghans decision to quit senior royal life and spend time outside of the UK is not a symbol of defeat: It is an act of self-respect and self-preservation. The move has been and will no doubt continue to be painted by critics as a selfish shirking of responsibilities, but its more of a shifting. Its not a question of whether the Sussexes are dutiful or not, but to whom.

In a 2015 essay for Elle, before becoming a duchess was even on her radar, Meghan recalled an especially formative memory: I was home in LA on a college break when my mom was called the 'N' word. We were leaving a concert and she wasn't pulling out of a parking space quickly enough for another driver. My skin rushed with heat as I looked to my mom. Her eyes welling with hateful tears, I could only breathe out a whisper of words, so hushed they were barely audible: 'It's OK, Mommy.' I was trying to temper the rage-filled air permeating our small silver Volvo.

Even then, Meghan knew that some fights just arent worth picking, not when your adversary doesnt deserve your time or energy, not when your familys well-being is at stake. As they drove out of the parking lot, Meghan sat with a simple reason for their disengagement: I shared my moms heartache, but I wanted us to be safe.

Sandi Rankaduwa is a Sri Lankan Canadian writer, comedian, and filmmaker whos written for the Believer, Rolling Stone, This Hour Has 22 Minutes, Exclaim!, and the Coast. She splits her time between Brooklyn and Halifax.

Original post:
The British Royal Family Has More To Lose Than Harry And Meghan Do - BuzzFeed News

Weight loss with the 5:2 diet: requires willpower but can be powerfully effective – T3

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:41 pm

The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent fasting plan that focuses on fasting for two days a week, while eating a normal diet for five days a week. As with all diets, there are a few variations of the 5:2 diet, particularly when it comes to how many calories you eat on your fast days, and what foods you should or shouldnt eat on your days off.

The term intermittent fasting refers to meal plans that revolve around regulated, periods of eating and then not eating, and there are several ways you can use intermittent fasting for weight loss. The most popular variations of intermittent fasting are the 5:2 and the 16:8 diets. On the 16:8 diet you only eat during an eight hour period, and therefore fast for 16 hours a day (obviously, the period when you are asleep is included in this, which helps a tad.)

The 5:2 diet applies the principle of intermittent fasting to days, rather than hours, and so you fast for two out of every seven days. It works by significantly restricting your calorie intake on those days, which means your overall calorie intake is lower, providing that you dont compensate and eat more than usual on your off days.

The original 5:2 diet plan, popularised by the Doctor and journalist Michael Mosley, recommends that on fast days women should consume 500 calories and men should consume 600 calories, which equates to roughly 25% of their normal recommended daily intake.

Since the publication of Mosley's first 5:2 diet plan, The Fast Diet, in 2013, variations have arisen, including from Moseley himself. His most recently-revised plan, published as the blood sugar diet because of the benefits of intermittent fasting on blood sugar levels well touch on this later recommends eating no more than 800 calories on fast days.

(Image credit: Pexels)

One thing that makes the 5:2 diet so popular is that in theory you can eat whatever you want on your 'off' days. It's true that no food is off limits and you don't have to totally deny yourself the foods you love. However, its important to be aware that what you eat on your 'off' days will impact your weight loss.

While the 5:2 diet only requires you to restrict and count calories for two days a week, naturally the better you eat on your 'off' days, the more likely you are to a significant amount of weight. If youre looking to lose weight fast youll need to be reasonably strict on your 'off' days and follow a Mediterranean diet on the non-fasting days.

If, however, youre looking for a sustainable diet that will help you lose weight and keep it off long term, then you can expect to lose around 1lb a week by fasting for two days and eating normally for five.

So what should you eat on your fast days? Its important to choose nutrient-dense foods that will fill you up more, making the calories you consume work harder for you. Vegetables, eggs, fish, lean meat and natural, unsweetened yogurt and are all good choices.

(Image credit: Pixabay)

The most obvious benefit of intermittent fasting is weight loss, because of the restriction on calorie intake. Whatever you eat, weight loss essentially comes down to calories in versus calories out: also known as your calorie deficit. In short, if you consume more calories than you burn in a day, the excess energy will be stored as fat. If, however, you burn more calories than you consume, your body will start to take energy from your stored fat, resulting in weight loss.

As well as this, intermittent fasting also benefits our blood sugar levels. When we fast whether thats not eating or eating less the insulin levels in our blood drops. Insulin is used by our cells to absorb sugar from the food we eat, so without insulin the cells are less able to use sugar for energy and so the rate of fat oxidation increases. Fat oxidation simply means when fat molecules are combined with oxygen to provide energy its what you or I would call burning.

What's more, some studies have shown that intermittent fasting helps you to lose fat without losing muscle, because fasting increases the level of human growth hormone in your body which in turn helps build muscle mass.

(Image credit: Pixabay)

The main difference between the 5:2 and 16:8 diets is the period of time for which you fast. On the 5:2 you fast for two days out of seven, but fasting is defined as consuming 500 - 600 calories. On the 16:8 you fast for just 16 hours at a time, but this means you consume nothing but water during the fast period.

Importantly, the weight loss principle is the same for both diets. By restricting your calorie intake for an extending period of time 16 hours or 24 hours your body runs out of carbohydrate to burn and instead begins to burn fat for energy.

Because neither diet restricts what you can eat, which one will work better for you comes down to lifestyle more than the diet itself. For people who have a regular routine around which they can plan meals, or who prefer not to eat early in the morning or late in the evening, the 16:8 diet is arguably easier to follow than the 5:2. On the other hand, the 16:8 requires you to fast every day, whereas the 5:2 only requires it two days a week.

What's more, the 5:2 is more likely to have a positive impact on your overall eating habits. People who normally skip breakfast and eat dinner around 7pm may find themselves accidentally following the 16:8 diet (providing they don't snack after their last meal). This could mean they don't make any conscious changes to what they eat. It's very unlikely that anyone's normal diet limits them to 500 - 600 calories, and so with the 5:2 there has to be a conscious effort to adapt your diet and make healthier choices. We think that's a good thing if you're serious about losing weight well and keeping it off.

Some users have found that it takes a little while for the weight loss to kick start, but nevertheless, the 5:2 diet works: "Initially there were two weeks when nothing happened, but after four weeks I started to lose weight," says Jackie, who began the 5:2 diet in January 2018.

Before starting the 5:2 diet Jackie weighed 9 stone 6 lbs, which put her towards the top end of the healthy weight range for her height and age. She wanted to lose half a stone on the diet, but ended up losing 1 stone 3 lbs in around five months.

"The 5:2 diet made methink more about what I was eating and how much I was eating on my 'off' days. While I didnt give anything up, I did reduce my portion sizes, particularly when it came to treats like cheese and cake. I found that fairly easy to do," says Jackie.So eating cheese and cake is compatible with losing weight? It seems so.

What Jackie found hardest was getting into the routine of cooking the lunchtime meals suggested in Mosley's book, and instead she found herself eating easier to prepare but less satisfying lunches like a sandwich made from one piece of bread. "I was always relieved to get to the end of the second fast day. Not so much because I was hungry, but because of the thought that the next day I could have things I really wanted - just not in great portions," she says.

As well as the necessity of good meal prep, users not surprisingly note that following the 5:2 diet requires willpower in order to overcome hunger on fast days. Other side effects include tiredness and low energy levels, and so its vital that you speak to a healthcare professional before starting the 5:2 diet if you are at all concerned about your health, are pregnant or have previously suffered from an eating disorder.

Want to keep track of your progress?

More here:
Weight loss with the 5:2 diet: requires willpower but can be powerfully effective - T3

Dear Dietitian What are the best diets? – Kiowa County Press

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:41 pm

Dear Readers,

Now that we are getting settled into the new year, many of us are working on getting healthier. There is so much information about diets, sometimes it's hard to know what is really good for you. U.S. News rated 35 diets, and coming in first for overall health (not just weight loss) was the Mediterranean Diet; the Flexitarian and DASH Diets tied for second place. A panel of nutrition experts ranked the diets based on seven categories:how easy it is to follow, its ability to produce short-term and long-term weight loss, its nutritional completeness, its safety and its potential for preventing and managing diabetes and heart disease (1).

Most of us have heard of the Mediterranean diet, but it was American scientist Ancel Keys who first correlated the diet with health benefits (2). It is a plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and olive oil. Moderate amounts of fish, poultry, and dairy serve as protein sources, but red meat is eaten no more than once a week. Red wine is allowed in moderation, as well as caffeine (3).

DASH is an acronym for Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension. This diet emphasizes whole grains, fruits, and vegetables. It is low to moderate in fat and allows 6 oz meat per day. The DASH diet reduces salt to one teaspoon per day, or 2,300 mg. Keep in mind this includes the amount of salt already in the food before using the salt shaker. Studies have shown that it improves high blood pressure in as little as two weeks. Caffeine and alcohol are permitted in moderate amounts (4).

Flexitarian combines the words flexible and vegetarian. The term was coined by dietitian Dawn Jackson Blatner, who published the first book on flexitarianism. It is basically a plant-based diet that allows limited amounts of fish and meat. Alcohol and caffeine are not restricted, but it's wise to use them in moderation (5). This diet is easy to follow and as the name implies, its ease lies in its flexibility.

The common thread throughout these diets is to eat more plant foods and less meat. Try to plan your meals around fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. For example, a whole wheat pasta with sun-dried tomatoes, olive oil, herbs and seasonings, more veggies, and sprinkled with fresh parmesan cheese makes a delicious entree. Fresh fruit with a touch of whipped cream will satisfy your sweet tooth.

It takes conscious effort and planning to change your eating habits. When making a lifestyle change, give yourself at least 4-6 weeks to get accustomed to it. If you "fall off the horse," get back in the saddle. That's the only way you'll learn to ride.

Until, next time, be healthy!

Dear Dietitian

Leanne McCrate, RDN, LD, CNSC is an award-winning dietitian based in Missouri. Her mission is to educate consumers on sound, scientifically-based nutrition. Do you have a nutrition question? Email her atdeardietitian411@gmail.com. Dear Dietitian does not endorse any products, health programs, or diet plans.

Originally posted here:
Dear Dietitian What are the best diets? - Kiowa County Press

Aspen Princess: Chasing The Aspen Idea through another ‘wellness’ run – Aspen Times

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:41 pm

A friend of mine recently posted an article from The New York Times about the wellness industry and how its basically a big marketing scheme that targets entitled white women.

Here in Aspen, we are all about wellness. Its not just an industry here its a lifestyle. Theres a whole culture surrounding this concept of self care, which is really just a phrase that has been coined by entitled white women so we can be totally selfish and then be able to justify it.

You could even argue that an entire culture has evolved from the idea of wellness, and that Aspen has been on the forefront of this concept long before it became a trend. Still, its everywhere, from that bag of gluten-free potato chips (potato chips have been gluten free, hello) to grossly overpriced athleisure labels who can now charge a hell of a lot of money for a pair of glorified tights.

But I have to admit, this article got to me. It made me immediately defensive, especially the idea that much of wellness is based on pseudoscience. I have learned in numerous ways that what you eat has a huge impact on your health.

But out here in the world, we are bombarded even with all these trending diets. Everything is gluten-free this, vegan that, Paleo or Keto. These are elimination diets that cut out foods that are deemed bad for us. Then comes a slew of products that meet the requirements of said diet, but whos to say theyre any healthier than what we started with?

It has occurred to me on more than one occasion that its absolutely ridiculous that we have the luxury to eat in these highly discriminating ways when there are people starving in the world. Its also occurred to me that its super annoying when youre out to dinner with that girl that spends 20 minutes requesting all kinds of substitutions not because she has any real allergies, but because she wants to be able to continue to squeeze into a size 4.

On the other hand, I have learned enough to understand there is a lot of toxicity in our food and it does make sense to try and avoid it. But lets be honest: my biggest motivator has always been to look good and to squeeze into a size 4 (all right, 6). Why sugar coat it?

As I get older though, my health has almost (but not quite) eclipsed my vanity. Having a baby at the late age of 45 created a few problems. That pesky gestational diabetes came back a check-up last year revealed that my average blood sugar was too high. I also have some issues around hiatal hernia the result of my stomach having been stretched from pregnancy and now putting pressure on my diaphragm, a condition that gets painful if I eat too much sugar. Theres also the little problem of being 10 pounds heavier now than I was in my early 40s. It seems as though we gain about 10 pounds for every decade after the age of 30. The women I know who are in their 50s, 60s and 70s and are still thin achieve that by not eating very much at all.

I once asked my friend Dana how she stays so thin in her late 60s. She leaned closer and whispered in a conspiratorial tone, Im always hungry.

Theres also the pressure of living in Aspen, a place where people are not only beautiful but also high-achieving in everything they do, especially when it comes to athletic prowess. Set foot into any fitness studio and youre bound to find a majority of well-coiffed, well-dressed, artificially young-looking people who are extremely fit and extraordinarily thin.

My friend had posted this article after I had just signed up to do a 30-day cleanse through a multi-level marketing company that sells nutritional products. For a cool $300, Id ordered a month worth of this companys various powders and teas that would help me detoxify and lose weight.

Id done this program once before and lost 14 pounds. Over time though, once I started eating actual food again, the weight creeped back on. The box arrived late, several days after the start date to the group cleanse. Still, Id peruse the private Facebook page that had been set up as an online support group, and discovered people were mostly interested in finding products that were cleanse approved.

Check out this amazing breakfast I had this morning, one wrote. A gluten-free bagel with eggs, tomatoes and avocado. You dont have to feel deprived.

Below that were a series of comments about how the gluten-free bagels were actually chock full of ingredients that werent allowed on the cleanse.

Then there were the comments about how the companys various cleansing products were causing bloating and abdominal discomfort, followed by more comments about how to use the companys other products to counteract the side effects caused by their products in the first place. You should double the amount of the fiber powder to help with the bloating caused by the protein powder, one wrote.

It occurred to me that a lot of these people were missing the point. Yes, a month spent guzzling various protein drinks, fiber formulas and detox teas might help generate a little weight loss, but you cant live that way forever. You also have no idea what those products are really made of, unless you take them to a lab to be tested. When the box finally came, I sent it back.

I realized maybe that article had a point. Wellness is an industry, and us Aspenites are precisely its target market. I guess its a matter of truly understanding what The Aspen Idea of mind, body, spirit is all about. I guess Im lucky enough to spend the rest of my life trying.

The Princess is eating vegan this month. Email your love to alisonmargo@gmail.com.

Read more:
Aspen Princess: Chasing The Aspen Idea through another 'wellness' run - Aspen Times

Intuitive Eating: The Not-Diet Diet for People Who Are Sick of Diets – VICE

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:41 pm

Maybe you read the widely-shared opinion piece in the New York Times calling on women to smash the Wellness Industry. Maybe youve heard that were in the middle of a backlash against diet culture, or that the latest diet trend is not dieting.

Sounds pretty good, right?

That not-diet diet everyones talking about is intuitive eating, and its the current source of curiosity/obsession among health bloggers, Instagram fitspo accounts, and wellness news publications including, I guess, VICE? 2019 was a big year for intuitive eating, with trend stories appearing everywhere from NPR to the Cut in the last several months.

This way of eating may be newly resonant, but its not newthe philosophy was introduced by dietitians Evelyn Tribole and Elyse Resch in their 1995 book book Intuitive Eating: A Revolutionary Program That Works.

Its not a fad, and thats the difference, said Lisa Sasson, a clinical professor of nutrition at NYU Steinhardt. I teach it in all my classes.

Put simply, intuitive eating is intended to eliminate the guilt associated with food and the binary of foods as good or bad. Its more of a psychological attitude; its not about counting calories or eat this, dont eat that, Sasson continued. Intuitive eating doesnt exult any of-the-moment superfoods; theres no obsessive nutrition label reading.

It is, technically, eat-whatever-you-want, but theres a bit of public misperception around that: Registered Dietitian Anne Mauney, who also uses Instagram to promote an IE lifestyle (@fannetasticfood), said that even though youre not paying attention to calories when eating intuitively, you are being conscious of how hungry or full you are. Theres a focus on how foods make you feel, and an emphasis on mindfulness. That means eating slowly, putting down the fork periodically, checking in after a few minutes to see if youre still hungry, and not continuing to eat just because theres still food on your plate.

The idea is that the longer you stick to these lifestyle changes, the more youre in control. You respect your own bodys signals, Sasson explained.

Its also not a weight loss plan, no matter what you mightve read. If you Google intuitive eating, intuitive eating for weight loss comes up pretty early, Mauney said. Its frustrating, because Ive seen a lot of people marketing intuitive eating for weight loss, which is not at all what its about. If youre really focused on weight loss, its going to be almost impossible to be an intuitive eater.

One of Sassons classes is called Nutrition Through the Life Cycle, and she said were a nation with an eating disorder, behavior that begins when were kids. Children rely on hormones that tell them when theyre full or hungry; they know to eat and when not to. Its parents who make them finish food even if theyre full so they can, say, watch TV or go play. When food becomes more than foodwhen broccoli is a requirement or cookies become a rewardthats when people get out of touch with their own body cues. And that internalized message can follow you your whole life, leading to moderate body dissatisfaction or an all out eating disorder.

Thats not the only thing making it tough to practice. Theres also the fact that the moment we live in is that it isnt built to make eating well, quite so intuitive.

We live in a 24/7 world of food advertisements on the television, on the radio, on Facebook and Twitter, said UCLAs Dana Hunnes, a senior dietitian at the Ronald Reagan Medical Center.

You know, I was at Macys, the department store, a few weeks ago, Sasson said. Every floor had food. You could smell the aroma as youre going through womens shoes, or womens dresses. There was an eating opportunity on every floor.

In a world where SUVs come outfitted with XL cupholders and snacks are engineered to make us crave more and more of them, eating well can be a challenge. When youre constantly being bombarded by billboards plastered with 20-foot-tall burgers; scrolling Twitter during, say, a week-long media craze over a certain fast-food fried chicken sandwich; or looking at the umpteenth grain bowl or smoothie bowl in your Instagram feed, it can be difficult to parse what you want from what you think you want. Hunnes said all that subliminal messaging can dampen or influence our own intuitive thinking, which makes it easy to see why some are skeptical about the IE lifestyle.

So what do you do about it? In short: If you think you want it, eat it. There's no judgement either way, this is all just information, said Molly Bahr, whos both a licensed mental health counselor and an intuitive eating Instagrammer. This can be a helpful reframe each time we think we mess up with intuitive eating ... there is no messing up, it's just information. How else will we learn our natural body cues, what we find satisfying, or what feels good in our bodies? It's all an experiment, and we're gathering data.

Intuitive eating isnt a get-fit-quick schemedietitians will tell you its more of a yearslong and in fact lifelong undertaking. Bahr said its a way of eating and living meant for anyone whos tired of going on diets but not getting the long-term results they expected or hoped for. One of the things she liked about it is that it can truly be tailored to anyoneespecially with the help of a dietitianregardless of their relationship with food.

Someone with anorexia or who has dieted for a long time may not be able to detect their hunger or fullness cues yet, but they can start with other principles like rejecting the diet mentality and work with a dietitian on how to navigate the hunger and fullness piece until the cues get back on line, she explained. Keep in mind, this process can take months and years. No one is expected to get a handle of all 10 principles in 12 weeksthat's sort of a lingering diet mentality.

If youre wondering where to start, or are interested in learning how you can adopt some of the principles in your own life, we asked them to demystify the process and tell us what the intuitive eating-curious need to know.

Bahr recommends reading the books Intuitive Eating, Health At Every Size, The Body Is Not An Apology, and Just Eat It. And she has an array of podcast recommendations: Dietitians Unplugged; Love, Food; Food Psych, Dont Salt My Game.

If that sounds like a lot of reading and listening and youre ready to get going right now, she also laid out the 10 principles of intuitive eating (which you can read more in-depth descriptions of here):

1. Reject the diet mentalityLearn about diet culture and why diets don't work, set aside weight loss goals, and let go of dieting behaviors to get out of our heads and into our bodies.

2. Honor your hungerEat consistently, throughout the day, including when you notice gentle signs of hunger.

3. Make peace with foodGive yourself unconditional permission to eat all foods (excepting those you cant because of medical conditions, of course).

4. Challenge the food policeSay no to the food rules diet culture has taught us about what, how much, how often, and when to eat.

5. Feel your fullnessListen for the signs you're no longer hungry; notice the signals telling you when you're comfortably full.

6. Discover the satisfaction factorEat what you really want to eat. No more food swaps for zucchini when youre feeling pasta.

7. Cope with your feelings without using foodSeek out and learn additional ways to deal with emotions and practice self compassion.

8. Respect your bodySimply put? Treat and talk to your body with respect.

9. Joyful movement: feel the differenceEngage in activities you find enjoyable, and notice what you like about it (better sleep, more energy).

10. Honor your health with gentle nutritionEat a variety of foods and notice how they feel in your body.

Note that these are guidelines, not rules. You dont have to (and truly, wont be able to) do all 10 right away. And, Bahr said, theres no such thing as failure or messing up here; there are wins, and theres learning. You dont have to go in orderalthough principle 10 is listed last for a reason. If we jump into nutrition too soon, we can quickly turn it into another diet, Bahr said.

What happens over time as we start to feed ourselves consistently with food we want, learn our hunger and fullness cues, notice how foods feel in our body, stop constantly trying to lose weight, and cope with our emotions in healthy ways we will naturally begin to crave a variety of foodsincluding nutrient dense foodswithout actually trying to focus on the 10th principle.

If you came to intuitive eating by way of Instagram, you might believe the movement is for a certain type of (thin, privileged) person. (Take a scroll through a few lists of intuitive eating Instagrammers to follow, and youre going to see a lot of white women with incredibly toned upper arms who incorrectly overextend intuitive eating into being a weight loss method.)

Social media absolutely creates a distorted sense of reality and unrealistic expectations, Bahr said. The people she chooses to follow dont center their body on their accounts. In other words, Bahr said, Their body is not their business card.

She recommended digging into your personal biases when it comes to intuitive eating online. Do most of the people you follow look like you or your ideal self?

It may be a signal to diversify who you follow. Look for accounts in different sizes, colors, abilities, and lifestyles.

I know how hard it is in the beginning to wrap our minds around this, but there are no rules in intuitive eating, Bahr said. (Unless, of course, eating something would be fatal.) As humans, we want what we can't have; a lot of people discover they don't actually like the foods they've been avoiding. It took me a few boxes of Pop Tart flavors to realize I actually don't even like them and I haven't looked back since.

Bahr described giving yourself this permission to eat as working through a habituation phasethink, for example, about how excited you are when you get a new phone, outfit, or even a new relationship. Now think about how you feel about these items a year later. The overexcitement fades.

This is where mindfulness comes in: eating slower, chewing, and really being aware of your food. Mauney tells clients to actually pay attention, put it on a nice plate, really sit downno distractionsand enjoy that food. You might realize that half of a cupcake is enough to leave you feeling satisfied, loosening the grip and diminishing the allure that certain foods once held over you.

When you assign a negative trait to a food, you give it power, Sasson said. If you worked in an ice cream shop, and every day you could have two scoops of ice cream, ice cream would not be a big deal anymore. Its denial and deprivation that can lead to obsession.

Its not uncommon to eat emotionally, whether that emotion is loneliness, or sadness, or good old-fashioned boredom. Sassons recommendation was to try and find something else you can do when youre stressed or overwhelmed, and to learn ways to deal that arent foodwhich can provide temporary comfort, sure, but doesnt deal with the real issue.

Bahr said that in the same way cravings and binge-y behaviors will become less frequent the longer you eat intuitively, external factors will begin to influence your food and drink choices less over time. Just as we can trust our body to breathe, tell us when we need to go to the bathroom, or go to sleep, we can learn to trust our hunger and fullness cues while also aiming for satisfaction in our eating experience.

Bahr said to throw out the scale (the one for weighing you, and the one for weighing food) and to delete your food tracking app and other fitness trackers, along with old transformation pictures. She recommends unfollowing accounts that promote diet culture, and instead following actual intuitive eating or healthy-at-any-size accounts.

But, again? Dont feel like you have to do all of that right now.

I havent met anyone thats completed all these things in one day, Bahr said. This takes time. We let go when were ready.

No one is a perfect intuitive eater. Im not sure we can ever 100 percent get rid of those [negative] thoughts, Bahr said. Just know that we dont have to believe all our thoughts. They arent always helpful. They arent orders. And we dont have to listen to them.

It might be really, really hard. This is not a way of eating or living that meshes with our get-it-now culture. But over time, you might feel better. Over time, you might be able to find the joy in eating again.

And whos to say something that gives you psychological joy isnt as important as something thats good for your body? Sasson asked. Start to learn the pleasure that food can bring.

What is intuitive eating? Its really that youre an expert on your own body, Sasson said.

But once again: Its a diet only in the way of eating sense, not in the do this to drop 10 pounds fast sense. Its being co-opted by diet culture and sold as the new weight-loss program, Bahr said, so its confusing to know what's current and who to listen to. Its possible to lose weight with the program; others gain weight.

For anyone who gains weight after intuitively eating, seeing [a] thin, fit celebrity talking about it and praising it may send them mixed signals and may damage their self-esteem, said UCLAs Hunnes. And that could lead an IE newbie to return to the disordered patterns theyre familiar with.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Emily Cassel on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Continue reading here:
Intuitive Eating: The Not-Diet Diet for People Who Are Sick of Diets - VICE

Adeles trainer reveals 1,000 calories a day and green juice diet that helped her shed SEVEN stone – The Sun

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:41 pm

ADELE'S former personal trainer has revealed the strict diet the singer was on to help her lose seven stone.

Camila Goodis - known as the Brazilian body wizard - revealed the gruelling 1,000 calorie a day regime Adele used to shed the pounds on Thursday's Lorraine.

7

As well as consuming half the recommend 2,000 calories a day for women andbeing strict about her meals, Adele also stuck to daily workouts to shed the pounds, she claims.

"She's working out but I think 90 per cent of it is diet," she told Lorraine.

"It's a good diet to shed the weight. The first week is intense, green juices and only 1,000 calories," she said.

"She doesn't look too thin - she looks amazing."

7

Pilates trainer Camila Goodis, 36, trained Adele, 31, alongside Robbie Williams wife Ayda Fieldat their Los Angeles home.

She said: "When she came for a work out I didn't know it was her and when she left I thought 'Oh it looks a little bit like Adele'.

"She looks amazing - she's changed her lifestyle and diet."

Adele told a holidaymaker on her recent getaway to Anguilla that she a lost a staggering seven stone.

The singer was said to have opened up to a fan about her weight loss while holidaying with Harry Styles and James Corden on the Christmas Caribbean trip.

7

Adele shocked fans as she showed off her newly slim and trim figure alongside her English pals earlier this month.

The mum-of-one looked carefree grinning ear to ear while taking in a little sun on the sand.

And now a fan has claimed the star was just as pleasant when she approached them for a chat and discussed her weight loss on the beach.

Lexi Larson told People magazine: "Adele came over and sat down next to me and my friend and was like, 'So what can I do for you girls?'

7

7

"We were so excited. We were talking to her for a little while, and then she got Harry Styles to come over and sit with us also. We took a picture with Harry, and we talked to them for 15 minutes probably.

"She said she lost something like 100 pounds, and that its such a crazy positive experience."

The lucky holidaymaker added that Adele "seemed really confident" as she chatted to fans at Blanchards beach shack.

The Hello hitmaker went on to get pictures alongside Harry, but refrained from getting any solo shots as she was joined by her seven-year-old son Angelo.

7

7

Adeledebuted her incredible weight loss at Drake's birthday party in October, just weeks after she filed for divorce from Simon Konecki.

She is said to have shed the pounds by working out with US trainer Dalton Wong, who also trains her friend Jennifer Lawrence - and following Joe Wicks's Body Coach plan.

A source told The Sun: Adeles been secretly working with these personal trainers.

Shes not the sort to exercise in front of others, so she follows regimes and plans at home, using their videos and tutorials."

smitten Love Islands Sophie cuddles up to MIKE in unseen backstage pic sparking rumours

Home and Away The lowdown on some of the filming locations for Homeland season 8

PIP TOP Phillip Schofield has worn the same top all week and fans think he got a value pack

Flight club Robbie Williams mocks Coldplay's vow to be eco friendly with private jet gag

ON HOLD Mindhunter cancellation fear as cast released from contracts 'indefinitely'

DARKER TURN Does Chantelle die in EastEnders? Fans think Gray will kill his wife

Earlier this week, The Sun revealed the star has also been working out with pilates instructorCamila Goodis.

She was introduced to the fitness professional by Robbie Williams' wife Adya.

Brazilian Camila has told how Adele hates exercise and believes her recent body transformationis down to 90 per cent dieting.

Speaking exclusively to The Sun, Camila said: I trainedAydafor a long time and it happens that they are good friends so I did Adele when she was there inRobbies house. I dont believe she liked exercise much but she has changed her lifestyle and I believe that 90 per cent was dieting.

Got a story? email digishowbiz@the-sun.co.uk or call us direct on 02077824220.

We pay for videos too. Click here to upload yours.

See more here:
Adeles trainer reveals 1,000 calories a day and green juice diet that helped her shed SEVEN stone - The Sun

Doomsday diet of mushrooms could save humanity in event of nuclear war – New York Post

Posted: January 16, 2020 at 1:41 pm

A full-scale nuclear war would likely trigger a worldwide period of cold and darkness that could spark a famine.

However, David Denkenberger, a mechanical engineer at the University of Alaska who runs the nonprofit Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters (ALLFED), told Business Insider that it would still be possible to save humanity with some type of sustainable disaster diet.

Experts have warned that a nuclear war between India and Pakistan would unleash a global catastrophe that would result in 50 to 125 million direct fatalaties and cause a sharp drop in the global temperature devastating the worlds food supply.

Researchers found that if Pakistan attacks urban targets in 2025 with 150-kiloton nuclear weapons and if India responds with 100-kiloton nuclear weapons, smoke from burning cities would release 16 to 36 teragrams of black carbon into the atmosphere, blocking out sunlight and cooling the global surface by 2 to 5C (3.6 to 9F), according to a news story on the website of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

According to Denkenberger, who published his work in the International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, there are ways to sustain humanity even amid a nuclear winter. A 2008 paper describing how fungi could survive a thermonuclear holocaust and a subsequent nuclear winter drew his interest.

The conclusion of the paper was, maybe when humans go extinct, the world will be ruled by mushrooms again, Denkenberger said in an interview with Business Insider. I said, Wait a minute. Why dont we eat the mushrooms and not go extinct?'

Mushrooms could feed on the milions of dead trees, which could potentially feed everyone still alive for about three years, according to Denkenbergers estimates in his study.

In addition to mushrooms, which dont need much light to grow, seaweed is another potential food source.

Seaweed is a really good food source in a scenario like this because it can tolerate a low light levels, Denkenberger explained to the business publication. Its also very fast-growing. In a nuclear winter, the land will cool down faster than the oceans, so the oceans will remain a little bit warmer. Seaweed can handle relatively low temperatures.

The mechanical engineer estimates the world would need about 1.6 billion tons of dry food per year to feed everyone, but he said humans could possibly grow that much seaweed in three to six months.

Theres definitely historical precedent, he told Business Insider, noting previous volcanic winters that have taken place and triggered cooler temperatures worldwide. But it has been a challenge getting people to think about these bigger disasters.

See the original post:
Doomsday diet of mushrooms could save humanity in event of nuclear war - New York Post


Page 1,088«..1020..1,0871,0881,0891,090..1,1001,110..»