Owls have been a part of our lives and folklore for a very long time. Today they are relatively widespread and frequently observed avian predators and are clearly depicted in ancient cave drawings in Europe and Asia.
European cultures generally reacted to owls with fear and avoidance, said wildlife biologist John Powers. Many people associated them with bad fortune and even death. Even back then, though, sentiments regarding owls were mixed. In some instances the call or presence of an owl was believed to bring good luck. Certain brews made from owl parts were thought to cure a variety of illnesses. Superstition aside, many a practical farmer recognized the value of a pair of owls as nearby neighbors. Also, the ancient Greeks believed the owl to be a bird of wisdom, an idea which continues today.
Owls were viewed with similar mixed emotions among Native Americans. Some Indian tribes believed owls were capable of transmitting important advice and information, especially to tribal shamans. Cherokee shamans, for example, considered owls valuable consultants for all important decisions. Some tribes believed the unique-looking raptors were responsible for guiding the souls of the dead safely to the afterlife. Other tribes highly prized the owls feathers, using them to fletch their arrows to ensure the arrows silent flight.
When Europeans arrived in North America they brought most of their negative feelings regarding owls with them, Powers continued. Few of their positive beliefs seem to have made the crossing. Many of them viewed the owl as wise, but that wisdom was usually regarded as being of a dark and somewhat suspect nature. In general, European Americans considered owls to be birds of ill omen. Their nocturnal habits have caused them to be associated in the minds of many people with everything thats evil and fearful. Strangely enough, there are some out there who still believe the untimely appearance of an owl is a warning of bad luck, approaching death, or witchcraft at work.
According to Powers, many early naturalists as well felt negatively toward owls, considering them highly destructive birds and wanton killers. They attributed considerable losses of poultry to owl depredation. Further, many of them believed owls were responsible for destroying large numbers of desirable game species such as ruffed grouse, bobwhite quail, ring-necked pheasants, rabbits and hares, and both gray and fox squirrels. Factually, these commonly believed reports have not been supported by food-habit studies conducted since the late 1800s.
Research has found that poultry makes up only a small percentage of most owls diets, Powers explained. Also, game species, especially gamebirds, account for a relatively small proportion of an owls prey. Findings indicate that nocturnal rodents and, for some owls species, even insects, make up the largest share of their diets. Of course, this isnt to say they wont take whatever prey is available, including the less-preferred game species and poultry. That usually happens, though, only when populations of their preferred food species in an area are very low.
The species that make up the largest proportion of an owls diet in a given area will vary with regard to the population levels of whatever prey species are available. In general, the higher a species population grows, the more susceptible the individuals in that species are to predation. Put simply, a big population of, say, field mice in a particular habitat will result in a lot of field mice becoming entrees for predators, owls included. Like other wild carnivores, owls will focus their feeding efforts on whatever prey species are most readily accessible and available. Over time, this concentrated predation results in reduced population and reduced susceptibility in the prey population.
Fortunately for the owls, said Powers, while they are focusing on one prey species, one or more other species will experience a population increase. Eventually, the owls will alter their feeding habits and concentrate on the prey that has become more numerous. This switching behavior benefits man by helping to keep prey species from becoming so numerous they become a problem. At the same time, the owls feeding strategy benefits the prey species by helping reduce competition for limited resources.
The broad range in size exhibited by different owl species and the corresponding differences in the size of their prey helps to reduce competition among owl species for food. Taking everything into consideration, owls (like the vast majority of other raptors) primarily consume large numbers of small rodents, making them far more an asset to man than a liability.
Owls and other predators are indicators of the overall health and quality of their habitats, Powers concluded. As predators, populations of owls are limited by the number of prey species available to them. Also, owls are especially sensitive to disruptions in natural systems. Therefore, healthy owl populations, especially of multiple owl species, can indicate healthy populations of prey species and be viewed as positive evidence of a healthy, stable ecosystem.
As superstitions fade, owls are being held in high esteem by more and more people. For scientists, their importance as an indicator species for the health of natural systems is of obvious value. For others, the sensual and aesthetic values of simply seeing and hearing owls far outweigh whatever minor negative impacts they may have.
Bob Kornegay is an award winning outdoors writer.
Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Get Breaking News alerts from the Albany Herald delivered to your email.
Get the Local News headlines from the Albany Herald delivered daily to your email.
Get the Sports headlines from the Albany Herald delivered daily to your email.
Read more here:
Negative myths about owls are just that myths - The Albany Herald